Kaiser7

Now I know that if I were buying a gun (everything of course, is legal in both states) from PA, it would have to go to a FFL, who would then sell it to me. Now what if I were to sell a gun to a PA resident? What would the procedure be? Would they need to fill out the transfer paperwork that we here in NJ do? How does all that work?

Pretty funny video, I figured you guys would get a kick out of it. XD

I'd pay for that. Perhaps offer it to be mailed out or something for folks who don't patronize his shop. I'm about to take my VZ24 out in a week or two to fire for the first time, I'd love to see stuff for my gun too (if it needs it.) Perhaps, if you know enough, you could start a series on this stuff.

What type of rifles are you interested in? I bought a Savage mkII (.22LR) for plinking, and I'm satisfied with it, I've also heard that the Ruger 10/22 is really good. Of course, if you have the money, ARs, and M1As are pretty sweet. Though I know myself, I love anything that's similar to the bolt action K98, I own a VZ24, and it's pretty nice. Of course, I've always liked rifles the most. Shooting my brother in law's 9mm was fun, but there's nothing like a rifle. Though I guess I've never tried a shotgun before.

I'm actually considering looking into gunsmithing if I end up not being able to get into dental school. Thanks for the help, but yeah, I don't think I want to do all of that yet, but I am considering just getting a simple lower receiver, and then picking up a long-barreled upper. I'll probably just use iron sights for a while, get used to some distance shooting, then later on get some sort of optic.

My neighbor had lent me a few magazines (reading ones, just in case I should specify haha) and really got me pumped into it. He mentioned the building one, and how it would be cheaper. It's relatively easy to assemble, isn't it? He made it sound like it's just a few pins you pop into place. Now how does one go about ordering a lower receiver through an FFL? Do I just walk into my local gun shop, and ask them to order one for me?

Nice. I personally like blackpowder, they're pretty cool, but I'd be scared when the flint strikes, and nothing happens lol. .22s are nice, there are some cool ones for sale in the marketplace that I saw. If I wasn't in the market for an AR, or SKS, or something, I'd pick up another .22.

Well, I have to admit. I always hated ARs. More of an M14 body style guy honestly, but (and feel free to make fun of me) I got an airsoft gun based off the M16A4 with an RIS, and the body style looked great. I always hated the carry handle and stuff. Anyway, I've been toying with getting a smaller caliber, semi-auto rifle, ideally something accurate, and I think I've decided. I want some sort of AR. Unfortunately, as I mentioned, I was never an AR guy, so I don't know enough about them. I've read they're accurate out to the distances I want to shoot, and the ammo is relatively cheap. Honestly, I've been converted, and have really adopted the look, and have heard great things. Of course, with our back asswards laws, I want some suggestions. I like the larger sized rifles, not much of a fan of smaller carbines, but I also don't want to break the bank. I don't mind buying second-hand, and as far as price goes, if it's over $1,000, I'd probably just buy an M1A. Anyway, for a new fan who doesn't know crap, please enlighten me with all of your knowledge of what's out there. (I do know things like the history, round, customizations, etc. just not sure what make/style/etc. would be right for me.)

It's an awesome feeling isn't it? I bought my first gun within 4 hours of getting my FID. I picked up a Savage MKII .22LR.

If I remember correctly, I turned in my paperwork around March 31st, and got my OK around May 7th or so. Of course, I pestered the crap out of my town, calling at least every week once the obligatory 6 weeks passed, and sending several emails over the course of the time to check on the status of my paperwork.

I hate nazism, since any sort of pride of my German heritage seems to make me suspect because of it, and I don't approve of this. Personally, I feel bad for the kid, he's going to catch hell in school. However, assuming there's no other abuse, then I'm not sure the government should be able to intervene. Assuming it's simply the name, and that potential bullying, etc. they will experience was the deciding factor, then why doesn't the government intervene when someone names their kid Chlamydia (Actual girl at my sister's school, there's also a Syx-Pece, or six piece.) I don't like the idea of the government intervening in anyone's life, even if disgusting people like this do do something so reprehensible. As far as I'm concerned, the 9th amendment is often forgotten, but is perhaps one of the most important, as it provides the most freedoms. It protects every other right that is not enumerated in the rest of the bill of rights. Therefore, they do, constitutionally, have the right to name their kid whatever they want.

Not sure if this is necessarily the case for CTD, I know I've ordered mags and ammo off there, but it may just be that they don't know our laws well enough. I've heard, (not sure if it's true) sometimes online companies won't bother selling to NJ residents simply because they have no clue what's legal here, and it's easier for them to lose one sale than to risk breaking a law.

Working at a Christian store has its benefits, I made sure to ask Saint Peregrine for help too. God bless you two, I'm sure everything will be fine.

Sorry for the double post. They aren't accurate to the real counterparts because in the real world, there are guns that are truly better than one another. In order to have a game with a lot of guns, and not simply have a few that are totally OP (over powered) they have to weaken them in some aspects compared to other guns. Otherwise the game would be really unbalanced, and everyone would simply use the same guns. As a game programmer, you have to make those sacrifices, as a gun lover, I feel your pain though. As for the spawning behind people, I hate that, but COD does that in order to prevent one team from simply fortifying and getting too strong of an advantage...Unlike BF, COD has always tried to have more fast-paced game play. BF is more realistic in terms of how it would play out.

http://www.hornady.com/ammunition/zombiemax Apparently they released zombie ammo. I'll give props to their marketing department, and it is a cute little idea, but I think it's foolish. I mean, I love zombie movies as much as the next guy, but this is a very foolish thing to do. You think some dumb group like the Brady bunch, or some other anti-folk are going to get the joke? They're going to say things like, "See! These people who own firearms are crazy, they really think Zombies can exist!" I think it's foolish of them to do this, since in this day and age, no one gets a joke, and will only look for any chance they can to diminish our rights. Besides, to quote Tallahassee, all you need is, "(A) Caddy, a box full of hollowpoints, and God willing, a G-D Twinkee."

I'm too broke to get BF3 or MW3 at the moment, but if anyone wants to play me in some MW2, or Black Ops, add me on Xbox Live. Gamertag is kaiserbundt.

Why don't we as NJ gun owners back a candidate? I mean, why don't we find a member of the boards who would want to run, and pit him up next year?

About to vote in a little bit. District 5 is hopefully getting Keith Walker in. It's funny though, how a lot of those districts, you were selecting between a C- and an F. God I hate this state. XD

I don't think we should be laughing about this. With the impending failure of Bank of America, and considering these occupiers have support in the government, and even some corporate backers, we should be worried, because some are actually listening to these people.

May have to do that another time. Don't get me wrong, people should know about that, but I don't think it could help me in this case. I pretty much plan just to do the whole "Gun control disarms law abiding citizens, gives criminals the upper hand, there are X amount of registered "assault" weapons, none of which have been used in a crime, crime rates in areas with loose gun laws are lower, the black market will still allow criminals to get guns, and that laws should be targeted towards law breakers, not regular citizens." I was planning on opening, or at least working in the quote from Jefferson about how "an unarmed man can be assailed with greater confidence than one who is armed." On a separate note, I don't get the whole anti-gun thing, I really don't. My boss's son said to me "every time I hear about a shooting I think they should outlaw guns." He couldn't understand the whole issue that criminals can still get them. It's depressing that people really believe that those laws are effective...

I agree 100% with that, I figured pointing that out will undermine my opponent's likely argument. My opponent is a NJ cop who doesn't believe we should be able to own automatics and what-not, but he'll likely debate from the all guns are evil standpoint. He's a nice guy, but I pretty much already have the edge over him debate wise. Also, if anyone is interested, I'll post rough drafts, and the final copy if anyone wants to see it. I plan to start it this weekend, but the material you guys have provided so far will be extremely useful, especially the FBI stats. I knew I was coming to the right place.

Haven't looked at everything you guys have thrown up here yet, but the stuff I did look at is FANTASTIC. I knew you guys would know where to go. I had tried looking in Rowan's databases and things, but couldn't find much there. I guess there's a lot more evidence out there than I thought.

Anyway, as the title states, I have to do a persuasive speech for public speaking, and since I tend to give better speeches on topics I'm passionate about, I figured this would be a good topic, and an easy one to do. Basically, I'm looking for any sort of stats that show how legal firearm ownership isn't linked to violence, how it actually decreases crime, etc. Any information for studies, or independent sources are the best, and if anyone can help me with that, it will be very helpful. Of course, any other ideas about how I can approach this topic will be useful as well, so if you have any ideas, fire away. Of course, sources that don't have a conflict of interest would be best (for example, if I cite the president of the NRA or something, that won't be as credible as an independent study). Anyway, just figured you guys would be interested, and probably the most able to help, plus, it's an interesting thing to discuss anyway.

Haha. Both really, there's plenty of socialist/communist countries out there, but America is special. Don't change it from the way the founders intended. Hell in about 20 years China will be running low on working age people, I'm sure they'd love to pay some of these OWS people a "living wage" of $.25 an hour to make Ipads and such.

http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2011/10/independent-reporting-of.html Yeah, this guy does a pretty good coverage. I like that he mentions one of the protestors is pissed he can't find work, but he was a Poetry major or some crap. I mean, I took biology for a reason, Can't become a doctor, go into dentistry, can't do that, therapy, can't do that, teach it.