RubberBullets

and buy what? 1oz bars? 5? If coins..eagles? Other types of minted coin? proofs? Im trying to read up but there is sooo much info going so many different directions. Im not planning on the world ending tomorrow and ill be bartering silver pieces.. would rather just have something of value rather than USD sitting in my safe.

If I wanted to put 1-2k into silver tomorrow.. where would I get my best price..and would it be worth getting say 5oz bars rather than coins?

Dont mind either of those... Now the new "Giant Voice" on the lakehurst side could drop some decibels.

Stop trying to "Mericanize your commie lead spitter. Youll probably slap that Pmag into the magwell and all that freedom built into it will likely blow the receiver to pieces!

That is the exact reason why some dealers will not sell to us. They just dont want the hassle of adding potential liability

Quid pro quo.. Ill help out too if you can help me with my liberty 30 coming today

I could use some .22.. but honestly im looking to get the ammo can deal with it Anyone wanna trade 1500 cci quiets for some standard velocity .22s? Dont think these bad boys will feed so well through my gsg

Same as last time. when you add to cart is shows OOS>

and until they can prove a death from a 50 cal bmg weapon.. F-uck them.

"The centerpiece of the plan is legislation sponsored by Senate President Sweeney that will create an electronic system for instant background checks for the purchase of firearms" Ohh you dont say.. Electronic? That's some fancy new technology yall got there with your puters and internet machines. Did someone remind them that the 90's were 20 yrs ago?

Anything up until this point is barely tolerable. Any law these legislators pass beyond our already stringent gun laws are the building blocks of an afraid, slowly disarmed populace looking for the govt to take care of them.

Id go all in on 1st spouse coins, but they have yet to mint the michelle obama series yet. Which leads me to my second question.. whos the hottest ex 1st spouse?.. Id like a fine piece of presidential wife tail on my bling.

But who needs other parts if your investment is just stripped lowers? People were willing to pay $400 for a once $80 alum lower. In past threats of gun control, lowers have always dried up first.. The ammo prices/scarcity this time around have been unprecedented. When investing in physical commodities, lightweight, small space, large rate of return trumps throwing out your back shipping out cases of ammo

Im not so sure about the ammo correlation. a 200-300% increase is good and all, but ammo is heavy, hard to store, and would only yield so much profit to the seller. If I had to guess in the arms world.. stripped alum lowers woulda been the best bet.. Lightweight, cheap, easy to store boxes of them and quadrupled in price at the height of the scare in the private market. There are plenty of things that WELL outperformed both gold and ammo over the past year that would have yielded higher results with little or no need for storage.

All the more reason to bolt it down and if possible, in a space where the opening side (left) is up against a wall to stave off prying leverage. I say again, there is a price point for every person. Some people are only looking to store a rifle or two..some cant afford to put away for a 4k safe that fits just as many long guns. In my opinion, the video above is bias because it is a controlled experiment with all variables favoring the crooks. I would expect these gents are well versed in forcing safes, not bolted to the ground, plenty of room for the would be crooks to work with a wide safe plus room for to guys prying. Read up on the products and its reviews before you purchase. Know your spending limit.. if you can stretch it further great. A smash and grab burglar should be deterred by the work involved trying to pry the cheaper safes properly secured. But most importantly.. a motivated thief will find a way to take or break into anything you have if given the time to operate.

Everybody has a price point.. This surely beats storing them in a closet...under a bed...or a gun cabinet. People with graffunders will always look down at ft knox owners...ft knox to liberty...liberty to mesa/bighorn safes...it all about what you can afford to protect your valuables. The important part is that youve made the attempt to secure and protect your valuables

Nonono..im sure we let them walk to trace the guns back to the source of the gun runners..im sure nothing bad will happen.. Where have I heard this story before?

in your case...tis better to hound the internet scene for ammo.. even if you pay a bit more overall youll save yourself from wasting gas and time to get it.

From what i read this is a test vote to see how much support they have to go to the floor on each bill

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/11/connecticut-gun-maker-declares-intention-to-leave-state/ They have yet to make their final decision as to where, but have commitments from their 40+ employees to relocate with the company. Id love to see an actual impact over these relocation attempts sending politicians packing. Anyone hear where magpul is headed yet?

Sigh...still havent found .308 gold match..although i look passively as not to be one of the on line at dicks crowd.

#lookatmytrunk

This one seems fun. If a restricted person tries to buy ammunition they are committing the same offense as criminal possession of a firearm even for just trying to buy it, not just being in possession. 1.9 Ensure Appropriate Punishment for the Unlawful Possession of, or Attempt to Acquire,Ammunition A person who is disqualified from acquiring or possessing a firearm (e.g., a convicted felon) who knowingly possesses or attempts to acquire any ammunition should be guilty of an offense of the same degree and carrying the same punishment as applies to the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm.

They are split on the mag restrictions, but leave it in the legislatures hands to decide rather than to offer up a solid recommendation. "Although the Task Force has been unanimous in all other questions, on this one issue of magazine size, we reached no consensus and therefore withhold any recommendation on whether to retain or reduce the current magazine limit, other than to recommend that policymakers further consider this question. There is, however, unanimity in the recognition that the balance of competing arguments would be different if the federal government were to re-instate a ban on large capacity ammunition feeding devices, because a national law might prove to be more effective in making large-capacity magazines less available. Furthermore, we believe that the State Police should collect and report detailed information about both the ammunition capacity and actual number of rounds loaded in all recovered crime guns. That data would provide more insight on how many cases might be affected by a change in the magazine capacity limit." at least they didnt say magazine clips. Id start doing a breakdown but the damn formatting from pdf to this is pissing me off