Heavyopp

I don't think anyone is arguing this part -- It is still a magazine -- but it does fail to feed ammunition at this point -- One could certainly argue that it does not fit the large cap mag description It's a far cry from having a loaded, complete, functioning magazine with a piece of tape on it or a dust cap -- You have an assembled magazine with something added to it to stop it's feeding abilities, temporarily Disassembled must be assembled 1st -- nowhere in the law does it say how long it must take -- In it's disassembled state it will in no way feed ammunition I would bet you would win in court but it's not a bet I am willing to take

Airguns of Arizona has the FX Bobcat -- $1795 Pasted from the description --The gun is packed with features like an adjustable cheek piece, an extended scope rail that is securely mounted at the breech and barrel for accuracy, an extra large pressure gauge, a quick fill system, a sound suppressing system, and more. Illegal in NJ -- What a wonderful state -- I bet your as happy as I am

Oh -- I think it's perfection At least in the picture...

permanently altered so that it is not capable of holding more than 15 rounds of ammunition With enough time, nothing is permanently altered to be fed continuously and directly therefrom into a semi-automatic firearm It's also interesting how they drop this part when defining permanently altered It's definitely not as clear cut as one would like

I have a bushnell banner on a remington 1100 that I use for slugs -- You can usually do really well on pricing of scopes from Natchez -- Their shipping charges are not so great

There is not a real big difference in the ballistics between 12 and 20 gauge slugs -- there is a huge difference in recoil to the shooter Point is -- a 20 gauge will be much more pleasing to shoot and plenty capable of taking your intended game -- less recoil means you'll shoot it more and become much more familiar with your shotguns ability to put slugs on target

Still have to use a shotgun for bear too in NJ -- In close enough a 12 gauge slug is very proficient at what it does -- doesn't matter what it comes out of as long as it fits you and you can put the slug where it needs to be

Lots of deer have fallen to an 870 --

Jon -- you have that in 12 or 20? I really wanted the 20 that Topher was selling here a few months ago but I couldn't pull the funds together and it went quick To the OP -- no need for a rifle here in NJ -- Most any quality shotgun will do To answer the original question -- My favorite Hunting rifle is my Blaser R93 with a 300 win mag barrel topped with a leupold 50mm scope -- the straight pull bolt makes for quick follow up shots and 300 win mag will take anything on the continent

I have to agree on that one...

I wonder what they'll use in the batteries of all those electric cars????

Alec -- the unfortunate reality is that I'm not entirely sure I'll be able to make this -- If I do you are welcome to borrow my gun with 1 stipulation -- You must shoot cci Mini Mags thru it With a match like this the change of lubricants used by different manufacturers of .22 rimfire ammo will effect the accuracy -- we are shooting flies I won't know till Friday

to be fed continuously and directly therefrom into a semi-automatic firearm This is the part of the law that I am going to focus on for the moment -- A bag of magazine parts, although still a magazine, is not capable of feeding a semi auto firearm I can easily stick more than 15 .22 rimfire shells into my 7 round .45 acp mag -- so it is capable of holding more than 15 rounds -- it is not capable of feeding those rounds into a firearm -- same as a bag of disassembled parts Could you imagine how much money would be spent arguing this in court??

Vlad -- I do understand where you are coming from and no way in hell am I going to test the theory but why the does the statute absolutely say, when defining an assault rifle, that even all the parts to make an assault rifle are considered an assault rifle -- constructive intent -- It does not define parts of a standard capacity mag as being considered a standard capacity mag -- Now it does say modified -- not dissasembled -- that disassembled mag, no matter how hard you try, will not feed more than 15 rounds into a semi automatic firearm -- not until it's assembled -- Is constructive intent spelled out in any of the laws regarding standard capacity mags? I personally do not believe that an aluminum pop rivet is in any way permanently altering a magazine to only hold 15 rounds -- takes a drill and 4 or 5 seconds to remove I could also easily weld 2 15 round mags together, change a spring, and have a larger than 15 round capacity mag -- is that now illegal -- somewhere that constructive intent has to be defined It's all just chatter anyway -- I saw that thread from midwest about the cut down pmags -- and though to myself how easy that would be to do -- and google brought me to the mag repair kits

But it does stop it from being able to feed ammunition into a semi auto rifle ---

Thats what I thought -- Just can't find anything that relates to mag parts in the confusing statutes -- doesn't mean it's not there - Just that I can't find it In reality a bag of standard capacity mag parts is just that ---- Parts --- can't feed anything into anything with a bag of parts ---

Is it legal to purchase a standard capacity (30 rnd) magazine rebuild kit? This rebuild kit is a complete, unassembled magazine. Is there a constructive intent clause on magazines? I do know there is constructive intent on assault rifles -- can't possess all the parts to build one... I been looking for the answer, on and off, for a few days now and my head is spinning looking at NJ gun law crap

Joe -- sounds like your admitted and have a room -- Hope nothing too serious

Are these still available?? I have never seen them before but I'll have to admit that I don't pay much attention to factory ammo If you guys can find the 3/4 ounce shells I would suggest you grab them -- Your kids will appreciate it

There really isn't an age -- It's more an attitude/size thing -- If he's scared of a 12 gauge then he starts with 20 -- The gun size has to fit -- really depends on the kid -- Jake fired my beretta 391 on the last outing but it was huge and uncomfortable on him Recoil is a big issue too -- Those light , single shot shotguns, really beat you up -- all the recoil energy goes into the shooter -- gun doesn't absorb squat I do use reduced power loads in both 12 and 20 -- My 12 and 20 shells are loaded with almost the same amount of 8.5 shot -- 3/4 ounce in 12 and 11/16 ounce in 20 -- thats a log way from most off the shelf shells

What style pants? I have 2 pairs of taclite pro and both pairs only have a single belt loop -- I wish it had a double, I'd use the smaller loops for the inner velcro belt for the AA gun belt -- As it stands now, if you thread the inner velcro belt thru all the loops on the taclite you loose too much surface to belt loops area and the outer belt doesn't stick well For the record -- my 5-11s are this seasons pants -- bought my 1st 2 pair this summer -- maybe a design change?

I have no idea about pools -- I would guess that you still would bond and ground the actual pool itself but that stays separate from the electronics -- I do agree that more ground rods seems better to me to but the powers that be say no more... It really depends on how your hooked up -- if you use a transfer switch does that transfer switch break the ground as well as incoming grid power -- some do some don't If the switch does, then you drive a ground rod at the genny to replace the broken at transfer switch ground -- it is confusing

Capped ready to roll -- Almost 72 pounds total -- I ended up cutting the 6" portion of the reducer fitting down an inch so I could put a piece of 6" pipe in -- Did this so the rubber fernco cap would fit easier -- The cap fits easily over 6 " pipe -- it was a real wrestling match to get it over the actual reducer fitting -- nothing like how the 4" fits on the 6" drums On the machine, running -- the machine didn't even hesitate to start with the 72 pound drum on there -- should be no issues

Here are some pictures of the 8" drum -- finished and a load running now... 8" next to the 6" Filled to this level is exactly 3 gallons of water Almost 35 pounds with just water... A little over 18 and a half pounds of de-primed 9mm brass -- I have no idea how many are in there Fills the 8" drum about halfway A little more than 20 pounds of media Almost 50 pounds without liquid -- It's filled to there -- water and the detergents filled almost to the top

This depends on how you have the genny hooked up to your house -- if it's hooked up to your house -- If you are using extension cords then yes, you should drive a ground rod to make a good earth ground for your genny -- If you are hooked up to the elecrical system of your house then you may go against code by driving another ground rod -- depends on the way it's hooked up The new electrical code doesn't want 2 points of ground in any 1 system -- don't give the electricity a choice in which way to go -- make it go 1 way 10 years ago -- electricity had a choice -- you needed to ground every sub panel -- what changed? Just the code