bzer1

In the past few weeks I've managed to show up just in time to get small pistol primers...3000 of em, and not at panic prices. Last week I picked up a 1000 round bulk pack of UMC at Cabelas for $230. Oh, and my bullet order from Dillon finally shipped, it's been a lucky couple of weeks for me with ammo.

92.4% against...I wonder if this is one of those polls that should be used in the debate. See, most Americans agree with me, that magazine capacity should not be restricted.

Congratulations!!!!!

The NJ assembly seems to be filled with nuts, we could put them there!!!!

I'd compromise...Here it is...You stop violating my 2nd amendment rights and shut up, and I'll continue to be a good and productive citizen. See? a win win...

Or maybe a majority as being pro constitution regardless of the issue. That would be best in my book...

Imbecile, ignoramous, F-tard, Mental midget, empty head, dumb ass, moron, ass hat, vacuous, elitist douche nozzle.

I bought 9mm dies from them, and that was not quite 2 months ago when everyone else was backordered. I got them in 5 days and paid pre-panic prices. I have no complaints...

The cost of the job is actually $50. The rest is for the environmental impact study, permits, and fulfillment of union obligations.

Does the current administration care at all about the law of the land? They can not be trusted...And the UN should be bulldozed and in it's place we can put something useful...Like a parking lot, or a huge new range...

It's your sarcasm font...You need the latest one.

A year after the assembly passes yet another round of insane, ineffective, second amendment violating gun laws, and we get CCW? Not likely, but it would be hilariously poetic...

While I commend you for your effort to get some facts entered into the debate. The sad truth is that the author is likely unconcerned with any facts that will in any way muddy the agenda driven article. These idiots will push the rights smothering agenda until it's a right that they hold dear being taken away. Of course if they succeed, there will be no mechanism to restore those rights. They are far too shallow and narrow minded to understand that. Foe supposedly educated people, they sure are ignorant of history.

Yea, I addressed that with my accomidating state line. It's the intangibles that are difficult to create an incentive for. Like How much of the already trained workforce is ready to up and move? How much will training a new, or partially new workforce cost? What about local suppliers? shipping costs can add up quickly until new suppliers are found or other accomidations are made. Contrary to popular belief, execs aren't heartless douchebags, they are concerned about what will happen to their community and it's people, and that can have a major effect on what they ultimately decide to do. Some of these questions can only be answered after the committment to move has been made, which makes the process that much more difficult. Personally as an investor in a few firearms manufacturers I would like to see them move to an incentivized location. As a 2nd amendment enthusiast, and as someone who loves his country, I would like to see them move to knock back the anti-constitutional movement being pressed forward by feckless political hacks.

Being among the first major players to speak up is a tough position to be in. If no one else follows, your protest looks kind of childish, and can cost a lot of money. Magpul for their part leveled their threat(course of action) and seems to be prepared to see it through. I think it's as much about passion for the industry, as it is about money. Although I'm hopeful, I still have serious doubts that any of the big names will conduct any major moves. It's a lot easier to move when you're a privately held corporation. Public companies have different priorities, and can withstand, and mitigate the reprucussions of caving. To them, it's a balance between the customer and the shareholder...Historically botcotts don't work, at least not in the long term. However, it will probably only take one big name, like Remington, or Colt, to bail out, in order to convince others to follow suit. I just think it's a damn shame that the people who helped build the company, will be the ones to suffer the most. My understanding is that the workforce at Remington is several generations in some families, who may soon be forced to uproot or loose their livelyhood. All because of a few scumbags, and some nut cases who couldn't control themselves, I'll let you decide which label goes to whom...

Moving a manufacturing facility costs big bucks. Closing a profitable one costs big as well. If a company is going to move they would normally expand an existing facility to cover the production of the one they will close. They don't enter into something like that lightly, especially if the major stakeholders do not agree with the reasoning, or if they think the risk of staying can be easily mitigated. The best case for moving Remington would be if the move were covered by an accomidating state, or if the savings realized by moving actually improved the bottom line so significantly that it became a no brainer. I wouldn't be horribly disappointed if they stayed right where they are...

I'm sure whom ever decided to let this subhuman pile of excrement out in the first place will argue that justice was served, or he paid his debt to society. I'm curious to know...Now that the system has yet again proven to be a failure, where does the little girl, and the family go for justice? Will the people responsible for letting this scum out on the street be held responsible? Never, they will never be held responsible, because they can simply say that they were just doing their job, or that sometimes the system doesn't work like it should. Meanwhile the criminal's civil rights are protected at all costs.

Because they're buying each and every vote they need with our tax dollars.

I bought my 9mm dies from opticsplanet.com and they were in stock, got them in 5 days. Of course that was a month ago. I bought the Hornady New Dimension dies.

The biggest problem I see in this, is that the people making these decisions, and taking these actions, are the very same people who are "educating" our children. They are one of the top 5 influences in a child's young life. As far as I can see the judgment of educators is at best sketchy. They seem to get more irresponsible every day, yet they "require" more and more influence in a child's development.

I built a ceramic coat and powder coating oven a few years ago. I used rock wool insulation to make the panels. I bought 11lb 3 in thick panels from McNeil in Robbinsville NJ. I was easy to work with and comes in different weights, and thicknesses. McNeil was easy to deal with.

I agree context is important, but in the eyes of the anticonstitutionalists the purpose of the question is not for educational purposes, it completely rhetorical. They don't really care. That is their way of telling us we don't really don't need them because THEY said so. So, the idea of educating them in the debate is a noble one, the reality is, they couldn't care less. At least that has been my experience. Fence sitters are another story though, so there you're spot on. Deciding who belongs to which group is the real challenge.

I loved one of the comments made by management...“I think they thought we were bluffing,” Reh said. “But Berettas don’t bluff.”

The answer is, because it's my natural right to defend myself. Last time I checked it wasn't called the Bill of needs...

Well if they're going to be consistant in their idiotic reactions, I would expect to see them try to pass a law disarming police officers. After all if the "best trained" among us can't handle their firearms how are common folk supposed to be able to. I wonder if the law makers in Albany will now revisit the provisions that allow the police to sport "high capacity" magazines? disclaimer: This is not a poke at LEOs, it's a poke at the idiocracy aka the left