ryan_j

Yeah I am going on in a future show with Albert almeida

Joshua Prince is willing to sue but needs willing plaintiffs and funding. Obviously he won't work for free, and from all indications he's pretty good. This is what Anthony may be talking about.

I meant Florida reciprocity in PA. There was a longstanding agreement between FL and PA. Kane modified it. Some are saying she did it illegally.

But that's old news. Florida was never dropped for FL residents. It was only dropped for nonresidents.

I pay 175/year to CR

There is a process. That said why not just join a local range? Most of them are clubs that fall under this rule. RTSP, Gun for Hire and of course ANJRPC cherry ridge

First I've heard of it, and it would be highly unlikely unless Kane was impeached.

I would take that with a grain of salt. Klukowski makes some very wrong assumptions.

Yes she can petition for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court. She could do it now in fact. We may have to sue NJ again but it should be easy to win. Or we may not, just depends on whether they want to play ball. Moot means that there is no more issue to be challenged with the case. For example if NJ passed a law saying CCW is shall issue, a case like pantano would be moot.

In Sussex county I pay $2400/yr for two cars. One 10 years old and one brand new.

It doesn't work that way. But nonetheless it would be good for us to all apply en masse to show that NJ issues few permits. This could be used in pantano or a similar case.

It's hard to say what will happen but no one objects to AG Harris intervening. This doesn't mean that she will get to intervene. It is likely that she will get it. As for the en banc rehearing, changes are good for a rehearing. We don't want that. Hey, you never know. Peruta being moot would enable Gura to take Richards to SCOTUS. It is clearly not moot as the sheriff is not issuing permits yet. I would say we will find out within a few months if Peruta stands.

District court. Still has a Loooooong way to go. Hopefully soon to be joined by the SAFE act challenge and maybe someone who gets some balls and challenges NJ AWB.

I'm talking about after his appeal.

Aitken was sentenced for possession of hollow points, because on appeal the gun and high capacity magazine possession charges were dropped.

Yep. Let's see what happens. The ATF may very well turn him down, but he's saying someone may have to sue to get them to obey the law.

They ask for proof of residency. This from the PA AG site: Some proof of residency. Not sure what that is, absent of a DL. Probably a utility bill. The biggest danger is if you DO have to use your gun, during the trial all the facts will come out during discovery. If it was discovered that you were not really a resident, then you are SOL. Regarding insurance, yes people do it all the time. Why do you think there are so many Florida, Pennsylvania and South Carolina plates in Brooklyn NY? Brooklyn NY is crazy with insurance rates. You can only imagine why. Some of the most aggressive drivers are in Brooklyn, and medical costs in NYC are sky high. So a lot of Brooklynites get plates and insurance out of state. They get a driver license from out of state too. When I lived in Queens, I had to go pick up a package from UPS in Brooklyn. It was funny watching a woman with a SC driver license and SC address on it try to pick up a package shipped to her apt in Brooklyn... they flat out refused her, LMAO.

Klukowski seems thrilled that we got kicked to the curb. You should have heard him on Cam and Co.

I am not talking about NJ. Let's say I buy a property in PA and store my MGs on it and go there to shoot when I want.

No one should have any reason to celebrate Drake being denied. Klukowski also makes some very wrong assumptions.

What she's doing is pretty pointless to solve an actual problem. If a Philly resident really wanted to get a valid out of state CCW, they could just get a Florida DL using a relative's address. People do this now for car insurance anyway. And let's not forget that real criminals don't really care about any permit. They will just carry. They don't even need a holster.

I'm going to start.

That goes without saying.

Joshua Prince (Attorney from PA) seems to think so. http://blog.princelaw.com/2014/05/14/did-atfs-determination-on-nics-checks-open-the-door-for-manufacture-of-new-machineguns-for-trusts/ It might be interesting. I could set up a trust in another state and legally own something like a Glock 18. Hmm. Of course I can't own it in NJ, but the point is that the ATF may have just opened up a door it didn't intend to.

SCOTUS challenges are not done yet. There are still the cases in California, and Evan Nappen's Pantano case.