ryan_j

It really doesn't, but to me it signals that the judge thinks that Peruta will stand.

Who said that? I think I know who, but I am curious to see if you saw the same thing I did. Also, the BIO is coming. No good attorney ever files one early.

Last one to drop will be Baker in Hawai'i. That one will be completely out of reach for Kamala Harris.

This is a different county.

This is really good news for us.

I think so too. Why put out an order you'll have to rescind in a few days. Next shoe to drop is Baker in Hawai'i. Same panel, same circuit, orals heard the same day.

Hot off the press, the 9th circuit rules in favor of concealed carry, citing the Peruta decision. Richards v prieto.pdf

Another ruling today. Richards v Prieto. In our favor.

Only semi auto, fixed or detached mag.

There's no such thing as a NJ FOID. FOID is an Illinois thing. We have Firearm purchaser ID cards. As for carrying the guns into NJ? You can only carry them to a gunsmith for purposes of repair, to an authorized target range, or to your home or place of business. Since you're not going to any of those places I would say don't bring your guns here.

Not true anymore. The last order extended the deadline and stayed the mandate. http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Peruta-v.-County-of-San-Diego_Order-re-Brady-Campaign-to-Prevent-Gun-Violences-Motion-to-Extend-Time-to-File-Petition-for-Rehearing.pdf

Calm and nothing in sussex county (I'm home today)

I don't think there is one but it is likely that they will do it by the 7th.

Maybe. Any one judge on the 9th circuit can call for an en banc hearing. If that happens, they will hold a vote and that vote will determine if they rehear it en banc. Unlike other courts, there are just so many judges in the 9th circuit that the en banc hearing is decided by a panel of 10 judges (10 or 11, I can't remember) instead of the entire court. It is extremely common for the 9th to rehear cases en banc. But they may very well decide not to. Here's the thing, if they decide to make the state a party, it is likely that it will be reheard en banc. This also means that the decision is no longer precedential and it won't factor into a circuit split for Drake. Then it will be likely that Drake will be denied Certiorari. There is a small chance that it could be granted but that is a small chance.

Maybe I'm just panicking because I smell victory and it is SO CLOSE.

So this is the separate lawsuit asking for the firearm procedures manual. Not sure where it is now. I haven't seen a decision and I believe the lower court sided with NJSP. But this is different from Jeremy Perez's lawsuit against Paterson where he was denied for a FID card because he refused to fill out the extra illegal forms. That one was not a NJ2AS lawsuit. AS for "credit" I mean who really cares. But actually ANJRPC has been addressing permitting abuses since 2009, a year before NJ2AS was formed. That said, I'm glad everyone is in on it now. I want to see whoever does this to succeed.

Which is it the lawsuit? Can you give a link to the decision?

I think you're talking about two separate lawsuits. The one where NJ2AS sued to get a copy of the procedures manual is separate from the one where Jeremy Perez sued and got a decision that only the two forms are required. As far as I know, NJ2AS was not a party to Perez' lawsuit against the city of Paterson. http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/appellate-division-unpublished/2014/a0498-12.html

More pressure is better. Personally I think ANJRPC has more legal resources available but this is complementary to NJ2AS' OEC. I am glad that both groups are doing something.

9th is a different deal entirely. Much more liberal court and a lot of pressure on them to rehear the case.

I'm only pessimistic if they hear it en banc. If they don't, then I'm wildly optimistic.

Harris motion to intervene.

Yeah guys so at this point it doesn't look good at all. If the 9th circuit decision is heard en banc, it is likely that Drake won't be granted. Eventually SCOTUS will hear some sort of carry case but this probably won't be it! Let's just hope they don't grant en banc in Peruta or we get some other miracle (another 9th circuit case maybe?)

Most importantly, don't try too hard to act normal.

Lawsuits to come. Towns get a legal notice first. All 566 of them and NJSP.