ryan_j

Scott Bach explained it on this week's GFH Radio. Step 1 is to get info on abuses of the permit process. Scott says a ton of them have poured in since the program was initiated. Step 2 is to put towns on notice that they need to comply with the law. They will send a legal notice to them. Step 3 is to start suing towns that don't comply. He also said that the past court decision that allowed towns to skirt the 30 day limit is bogus.

The two that I know have the permit. They also qualify semi annually. So they're legal.

The electronic SB212A is being rolled out to local PDs. NJSP is already using it.

Yes yes I know there are exceptions. But this wasn't one and the judge didn't buy JCPD's phony story.

The permit process is still paper. The only online thing you do now is the SBI background check. I did that with NJSP and they still took 5 months.

I hope it doesn't end there. His life was ruined. He lost his job and had to pay legal bills. JCPD also needs to learn a lesson. Always get a warrant or get consent.

http://www.anjrpc.org/?page=A_Strikeforce They launched a new project called Strikeforce. They are going to serve legal notice to local PDs and NJSP and even sue departments who do not comply. I guess it's like NJ2AS Operation Establish Compliance but this seems more aggressive. But in the end I don't care who does it, only that they do.

Got my (printed) copy of ANJRPC News and Briefs today. Bach says that 1195 figure includes retired LEO. I find that hard to believe for two reasons. One is that NJSP's statistics specifically say they exclude retired LEOs. Two, retired LEO is shall issue. And really, a lot of retired cops carry. I know three that do, and two of them are retired COs.

Oh by the way, these folks work for the ATF. Thank the NRA for Eddie Eagle, so the kids turned in the guns. It could have ended badly. http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/atf-agents-lost-track-of-dozens-of-their-own-guns-reports-show-b99213499z1-247182581.html

Gura discusses all of these figures in his supplemental brief in Piszczatoski (now Drake) in the 3rd circuit.

Some people just like the look of the 30 round standard capacity pmag, the whole banana look. Others say that the magpul mags are reliable and work better (I don't know how they determine that, exactly, especially since the mag is now modified).

I never really get this mindset. As it is, the right is already denied by default outside of the home. If a supreme court decision affirms this, absolutely nothing changes. No states that are shall issue will go may issue. No states that are may issue will go shall issue. But if we win, we get shall issue nationwide. That is a pretty damn big deal. So, what have we got to lose? If you're pro 2A? Absolutely nothing. If you're an anti? Everything.

Looks like Pantaleon was acquitted. The document says February 24.

These guys explain it better http://onlygunsandmoney.blogspot.com/2014/02/antis-seek-en-banc-review-of-peruta.html

Prime?

Not in the eyes of the antis. Brady gave him an attaboy yesterday.

Bloomberg carries? I don't know about that. He has armed security though.

Note that she did not directly appeal. She cannot. She has no standing. She filed an appeal and is urging the court to act sua sponte and is asking to be a party in the case. They can and probably will tell her to go pound sand and not waste their time. She was asked twice to be a party to this case before. She turned it down. Now that the decision is not favorable she wants in. Slap in the face much?

She is TRYING to appeal. She has no standing to appeal and she wants to become a party to this case. My bet is that this really does nothing directly but it may spur a judge on the 9th to call for an en banc hearing sua sponte (meaning the court itself requests it). However, CalGuns has been pointing out that this is exactly how Nordyke played out before the Supreme Court took McDonald, and this may give them Court sufficient motivation to take Drake.

Hawaii has issued something like 10 permits. NJ issued 1195. DC is still no issue. Illinois WAS no issue until Moore. NYC is better than NJ though.

He will then respond with the Bloomberg/Brady talking point "if it saves just one life it's worth it."

Then he's lying because he has said that he doesn't carry a weapon.

Yep! Cory Booker even said that he would be missed.

I would be completely fine with disarming him. This is the guy who repeatedly argued with cops outside his jurisdiction and went on a drunk rampage, shooting out streetlights. He shouldn't be on any police force. He should be in jail. This was also Cory Booker's police chief for a long time.

http://wgnradio.com/2014/02/26/chicago-police-supt-garry-mccarthy-talks-door-to-door-gang-intervention/ About 2/3 the way to the end he talks about CCW in Illinois. And he also mentions the "loud music" incident and the popcorn/texting incident, as examples of why CCW is a bad idea. He also mentioned that someone doesn't become proficient with a firearm with just 16 hours training. By the way he forgot to mention that the guy who shot the popcorn throwing texter in the theater was a retired cop.