ryan_j

I have never heard of him. Nor has anyone else here. Seriously though, Colion is the man. Just recently got admitted to the bar too.

Actually no. You don't have to work for an armored car company. You just have to be a security guard. But you also have to go through all the other stuff like SORA and training. And when that's all said and done, most times you get a restricted permit.

I would go with an Onan. Costco sells them.

CCW is better than NJ though, but just barely. If you carry cash, have a business with cash flow (do not need to specify amount) are a crime victim, or you are a member of certain professions including doctors you can get one.

Well my "chief" would be Rick Fuentes since NJSP would be my PD. But since it would be a restricted permit it would be close to useless for me.

How hard is it to get one as a security guard? I know it is heavily restricted but I'm curious about that process.

A bit too late for that, which is why this bill came up in the first place.

I wonder how long it will take?

One guy reported his XDS-9 went full auto as he racked the slide.

Honestly if a guy who restocks ATMs with lots of cash or a guy who got threats from Al-Qaeda can't get one, your chance is slim to none. But if you want to go through the exercise of applying you need the forms, a range qualification and training along with 3 references. The judge has the final say even if your police chief approves.

No that is 2C:39-6f, and is prefaced by: f. Nothing in subsections b., c. and d. of N.J.S.2C:39-5 shall be construed to prevent: So basically it means without a FID card you can do everything under f, as prescribed, but if you have a FPID card you can possess in general. Think about it, if 2C:39-6f applied the way you thought, then it would mean that people with carry permits would not be able to carry.

I have the same one you do, the EU6500iS. Has never skipped a beat. Great generator.

The Honda generators have a special port and cable you use. It basically syncs the inverters together. I've seen this on Champion inverter generators as well. Don't attempt to parallel other generators together. It won't work and you may damage the generators.

It's in 2C:39-5. Right at the beginning. NJ does in fact distinguish between handguns and long arms. NJ doesn't talk about carry except when referring to the permit to carry. It talks about possession (which is why the right to carry is important, it's about a right to possess). So if you want to possess a handgun, you need a permit to carry a handgun. If you want to possess a rifle or shotgun, you need a firearms purchaser ID card. Then there are the exceptions which say that you can possess in certain places ONLY and transport directly to and from (2C:39-6). 2C:39-5. Unlawful possession of weapons. 2C:39-5. Unlawful possession of weapons. a. Machine guns. Any person who knowingly has in his possession a machine gun or any instrument or device adaptable for use as a machine gun, without being licensed to do so as provided in N.J.S.2C:58-5, is guilty of a crime of the second degree. b. Handguns. Any person who knowingly has in his possession any handgun, including any antique handgun, without first having obtained a permit to carry the same as provided in N.J.S.2C:58-4, is guilty of a crime of the third degree if the handgun is in the nature of an air gun, spring gun or pistol or other weapon of a similar nature in which the propelling force is a spring, elastic band, carbon dioxide, compressed or other gas or vapor, air or compressed air, or is ignited by compressed air, and ejecting a bullet or missile smaller than three-eighths of an inch in diameter, with sufficient force to injure a person. Otherwise it is a crime of the second degree. c. Rifles and shotguns. (1) Any person who knowingly has in his possession any rifle or shotgun without having first obtained a firearms purchaser identification card in accordance with the provisions of N.J.S.2C:58-3, is guilty of a crime of the third degree. (2) Unless otherwise permitted by law, any person who knowingly has in his possession any loaded rifle or shotgun is guilty of a crime of the third degree. d. Other weapons. Any person who knowingly has in his possession any other weapon under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for such lawful uses as it may have is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree. e. Firearms or other weapons in educational institutions. (1) Any person who knowingly has in his possession any firearm in or upon any part of the buildings or grounds of any school, college, university or other educational institution, without the written authorization of the governing officer of the institution, is guilty of a crime of the third degree, irrespective of whether he possesses a valid permit to carry the firearm or a valid firearms purchaser identification card. (2) Any person who knowingly possesses any weapon enumerated in paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection r. of N.J.S.2C:39-1 or any components which can readily be assembled into a firearm or other weapon enumerated in subsection r. of N.J.S.2C:39-1 or any other weapon under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for such lawful use as it may have, while in or upon any part of the buildings or grounds of any school, college, university or other educational institution without the written authorization of the governing officer of the institution is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree. (3) Any person who knowingly has in his possession any imitation firearm in or upon any part of the buildings or grounds of any school, college, university or other educational institution, without the written authorization of the governing officer of the institution, or while on any school bus is a disorderly person, irrespective of whether he possesses a valid permit to carry a firearm or a valid firearms purchaser identification card. f. Assault firearms. Any person who knowingly has in his possession an assault firearm is guilty of a crime of the second degree except if the assault firearm is licensed pursuant to N.J.S.2C:58-5; registered pursuant to section 11 of P.L.1990, c.32 (C.2C:58-12); or rendered inoperable pursuant to section 12 of P.L.1990, c.32 (C.2C:58-13). g. (1) The temporary possession of a handgun, rifle or shotgun by a person receiving, possessing, carrying or using the handgun, rifle, or shotgun under the provisions of section 1 of P.L.1992, c.74 (C.2C:58-3.1) shall not be considered unlawful possession under the provisions of subsection b. or c. of this section. (2) The temporary possession of a firearm by a person receiving, possessing, carrying or using the firearm under the provisions of section 1 of P.L.1997, c.375 (C.2C:58-3.2) shall not be considered unlawful possession under the provisions of this section. h. A person who is convicted of a crime under subsection a., b. or f. of this section shall be ineligible for participation in any program of intensive supervision; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply to a crime under subsection b. involving only a handgun which is in the nature of an air gun, spring gun or pistol or other weapon of a similar nature in which the propelling force is a spring, elastic band, carbon dioxide, compressed or other gas or vapor, air or compressed air, or is ignited by compressed air, and ejecting a bullet or missile smaller than three-eighths of an inch in diameter, with sufficient force to injure a person. i. A person convicted of violating subsection a., b. or f. of this section shall be sentenced by the court to a term of imprisonment, which shall include the imposition of a minimum term during which the defendant shall be ineligible for parole, if the court finds that the aggravating circumstance set forth in paragraph (5) of subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:44-1 applies. The minimum term of parole ineligibility shall be fixed at five years. The sentencing court shall make a finding on the record as to whether the aggravating circumstance set forth in paragraph (5) of subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:44-1 applies, and the court shall presume that there is a substantial likelihood that the defendant is involved in organized criminal activity if there is a substantial likelihood that the defendant is a member of an organization or group that engages in criminal activity. The prosecution at the sentencing hearing shall have the initial burden of producing evidence or information concerning the defendant's membership in such an organization or group. Amended 1979, c.179, s.4; 1990, c.32, s.2; 1992, c.74, s.2; 1992, c.94, s.1; 1995, c.389; 1997, c.375, s.2; 2007, c.284; 2009, c.13.

The active judges are comprised of 7 Clinton and Obama appointees and 5 GW Bush Appointees. A lot of the judges appointed by Democrats are getting up there in age. What can I say. Vote Republican in 2016? Or vote Republican in 2014 as a matter of fact, or even vote R in the October election. The Rs take the senate and they can block Obama's appointees before he gets to do any real damage. Because you know a liberal supreme court is pretty much the end for us.

They have 90 days to respond to a cert petition and they typically take almost the full 90 days. That said, if they grant cert in our case, it could very well come up in the 2015 term. Let's hope that they take the Maryland one, because who knows what the court will be like in a few years. One more Sotomayor, Kagan or <shudder> Ginsburg on the court and we are toast. An answer for the Maryland case is due in October.

So from here it goes to a cert petition for SCOTUS to hear it. They have 90 days to file, which means late November at the latest.

Rehearing en banc DENIED. 8 to 4 vote.

Nothing. But, don't get your hopes up. Those are usually denied. The good news is that the Woollard case (Maryland) along with this one are ramping up to go to SCOTUS. Scott Bach was on GFH radio a couple weeks ago talking about it. He was saying that the backstop is the Pantano case that Evan Nappen is arguing in the NJ Supreme Court.

Great. So who's going to make that happen? The legislature? AG? Christie?

I don't know what else to say. When you draw attention to it, you're a cop hater, cops aren't paid enough, cops should walk off the job and let criminals reign free, bla bla bla. You leave it alone and everyone is happy except those who encounter the (few) bad eggs. So it's best to just leave it alone.

I say let them continue doing it. When they lose a bunch of cases in court because they f'ed up they'll get the message.

Not a medical doctor, but a doctor of Chiropractic.

Illegal plain and simple. But talk to them and be polite about it. NJ2AS may be able to help since they have an attorney on retainer for this.

That's fairly recent. Last year I got mine in 2 months from Sussex NJSP.