HBecwithFn7

And they didn't give you credit for that? Can you not deduct it from your NH tax return (albeit for just "interest and dividends")?

Relativity. In my response, I was comparing NJ to FL, where I visit often, where I'm also incorporated as a "Foreign LLC," and would very much like to relocate, permanently. Relative to FL, NJ is a different dynamic, and the tax structure reflects that. FL has no income tax. What it has is a lot more land than NJ. It also has more people than NJ (21 million est. by 2020, as opposed to 9 million in NJ), but (unlike NJ) most are retired and aren't working. They do, however, own land. So it makes sense to build a tax structure based on land/property values than on wage/income production. Since it is more land and more people owning land, the tax rates can seem a lot lower than NJ, as long as the total revenue collected makes up for FL's budgeted needs (which may also be different than NJ). Another place FL makes up for it is with Govt/Bus. fees. My LLC annual (and other) fees are 3 times greater in FL than in NJ. And yes, Fuel taxes and other consumer items (groceries) are higher in FL. Not to mention, all the different "county" and "municipal" taxes imposed in FL, in addition to state property taxes.... Although, FL does seem to have cheaper insurance (health, Auto,etc.). Then that will be another reason to leave the state. I'm not so sure that those taxes will go up all that quickly (why haven't they, already?), as I'm thinking the oil companies will try and lobby to keep them low. Higher taxes means less demand for gasoline and less revenue/profit for the oil companies. If the pump price is to increase, better it be in a way that means increased revenue for the oil company than for the Govt. Furthermore, a minor component is production/distribution costs. Since many if not most of the refineries are in NJ and Tx, the costs to distribute locally are a bit less than having to truck it all the way to the west and south. Even within NJ itself, the prices are much lower as you get closer to the refinery locations, than compared to further away, within the state.

If I were him, I'd release it anyway. If he doesn't, then he gets tagged with all the pro-2A backlash (assuming he doesn't want that). This way, he can let the L & PS committee take the hit (which they've done already with these other bills, so what's another hit to them...).

Same here, Got mine for $36.99/100. And, if you use the promotional code the OP mentioned and order at least 3 boxes of 100, you get shipping free.

Higher property taxes, gasoline taxes, higher fees for govt. services, higher "corporate" taxes, etc, etc. Florida also has no income state income tax either, but it has a sales tax (and counties and municipalities can impose other taxes).

Unfortunately, I doubt this bill would ever make it past the L & PS committee, let alone reach the floor. But yes, Bravo to MPC for raising awareness. Of course, the MSM has no intention of publicizing it.

It's all about reaching the "sheeples." Something we really need to figure out how to do better, in spite of the MSM's not wanting to help us.

Which could be one reason why people who *are*, actually, "clean," choose not to run. Not wanting to "get dirty."

If he has vetoed, his office better publicize it pronto.... lest it get "leaked" and then spun in a bad way by the MSM!. I can't believe there aren't any "anti" spies with access to the Gov's office. CC et. al really can't afford to lose control of the story.... Let's just hope they're just "taking out the Friday Trash," tomorrow.

For how long? Until they re-introduce the bill "the next time?" This will pass, eventually... certainly when CC leave's office and the new Gov. is elected. Hopefully, it will buy us some time to GTFO PRNJ...

Is there a distinction, however, between "resident" and "land owner?" I believe the OP will be "renting" when they establish residency. I had always thought that in re: rental property (i.e. "private" property), it is the land owner's call. Witness all the confrontational issues in re: restaurants, malls, stores, etc.... all "private property." I would think this also applies to "residential" rental property as well. If prohibited in the lease, the "resident" cannot possess their weapons on that property. If approved by the land owner, then the problem arises in re: "transportation" to/from that rental property.

It was in stock as of when I scored mine. The order is still "in process." I hope it gets "fulfilled" and shipped.

Scored some! Thanks!

I believe anything with an arrow listed next to it, simply indicates that a moderator or admin moved the post to a different sub-forum, and is just keeping a link (hence the arrow) in the original location. It just so happens that 99.9999% of the articles that are moved anywhere, are moved to a place where you need a password to get in and view it. Like the "1st Amendment Lounge..."

Yup...."Take Out the Trash" day... And, fittingly, "Friday the 13th" to boot! We shall see.....

Most people store at home, and use the big gun safes for that purpose. The mag reduction bill (to reduce from 15 to 10) is currently on the Gov's desk. We all hope he will veto, especially if he still has national political aspirations. He has 45 days from the day it reaches his desk to take action. If he doesn't, it becomes law anyway. He has about 20 days left at this point. Not sure about your potential neighbors, but I would never let mine know. I know a couple who are die hard anti's and would make a ton of trouble for me if they knew. I'd stay on the conservative side and keep it to yourself, until you get to know them.

Let's hope it doesn't.

Weeeeeeeelllllll not *all* of it. We here in Warren/Sussex/Hunterdon Counties do our best, as do our district reps (24th in my case). But I absolutely agree with most of what you say... especially not discussing with neighbors. Several of mine I know are definitely anti...and nosy as all get out. Roger your advisoryl in re: Summit. It's a nice affluent city in itself (it's where Meryl Streep as born). But it's in Union County (County seat: Elizabeth), and that may cause some issues in re: getting your docs done in a timely fashion. Anyway, I feel for the OP, as most of my family is from GA. My sister was born in Atlanta. 3 of my Grandparents are from GA (Augusta, La Grange, and the 2nd oldest incorporated US City, St. Marys).

In this particular case, I don't think the MSM is going to let CC get away with a "Take Out the Trash" scenario. I expect him to take a pounding... either way, but especially if he vetoes. And for at least a month afterwards. Look at how long it took Bridgegate to simmer down to a dull roar....

When I hear it from the Gov's office, it will be more interesting...

I'm not looking for "accuracy/reliability." I'm looking for "activity." It's totally quiet, right now. If CC has taken action on this, then it hasn't been announced yet. I'd expect at least one tweet from the Office of the Gov., followed by a bunch of tweets from all sides. So far, nothing but crickets...

MSSM....... (Main Stream Social Media) Twitter, Yahoo, FB, etc. etc. etc.

Definitely no "social media" activity on it yet, either.... No tweets or anything....

But, (and especially in light of the most recent shootings), if he vetoes it, he also risks a ton of negative karma from the gun grabbers and, especially, the MSM and "anti" social media outlets, who will keep the pressure up well into the holiday and after it's over. It's a tough risk/benefit calculation for him. Still, fair point about his not having signed it yet. If he was really in favor of it, he'd have done it by now. Helluva tightrope he's walking...

Today, I completed a transaction with our fellow member "locochinoloco" for some mag pouches. He accepted Paypal and shipped within 24 hours of payment. Sent me tracking numbers et. al. Thought I'd give him a "+1" endorsement... hopefully helpful, in light of the recent issues we've had with fellow members and "transactions." Thanks loco! Regards, HB