Sniper

Or, another option, everyone can grow a pair and stand up for your legal rights: Ex post facto law An ex post facto law (corrupted from Latin: ex postfacto, lit. 'out of the aftermath') is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences (or status) of actions that were committed, or relationships that existed, before the enactment of the law. In criminal law, it may criminalize actions that were legal when committed; Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with respect to federal laws) and Article 1, Section 10 (with respect to state laws). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law

Just remember to blame this shooting on the extended mag...... NOT the person behind the trigger.... ...."(CNN) Back in April, officers in Thousand Oaks, California, responded to a disturbance at the home of Ian David Long. Long, a 28-year-old who had spent several years with the Marines and served in Afghanistan, was acting somewhat irate and a little irrationally, according to Ventura County Sheriff Geoff Dean. A mental health specialist with the crisis team met with him and felt he might be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. But after speaking with him, they decided not to detain him under laws that allow for the temporary detention of people with psychiatric issues. A neighbor said Long's mother "lived in fear" of what her son might do, saying when police were called to the house earlier this year "it took them about a half a day to get him out of the house." Neighbor Richard Berge said Long's mother told him she was concerned about her son, though not worried about her own safety, and that "she was ... kind of beside herself, she didn't know what to do because he wouldn't get help." https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/us/thousand-oaks-gunman/index.html

That's what half of the population and half of Congress will be made to believe.

Yes, they're both Fully Auto Machine Guns, according to the Liberal media:

So, since there might be a chance of an innocent being shot by the off duty cops, they should just back down, and not engage the shooter, and let him continue his rampage? Isn't "shooting into a packed crowd" exactly what that shooter was doing?

The bodies of the victims aren't even cold yet, but it starts anyway..... After California shooting, Democrats vow to tackle gun violence As news of the mass shooting at a California bar unfolded, several Democrats promised to use their new majority in the House to address gun violence. California Sen. Dianne Feinstein blasted Trump and Republicans for the gun violence that's plagued the nation, particularly in the past few weeks. "This failure to act is cowardice of epic proportions. We may not be able to stop all gun violence, but that doesn’t mean Republicans should be allowed to bury their heads in the sand and not try to stop any of it," Feinstein said. Feinstein also maintained that despite California's staunch gun laws, the state can't keep guns coming in from other states "without stronger laws." (Hey Diane, maybe you should go for a 5 round mag limit, after all, we all know criminals ALWAYS follow existing laws, right) Florida Rep. Ted Deutch, a Democrat, said his party "will take up comprehensive, nation-wide reforms, but we can’t make our communities safer if we don’t do this together." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-california-shooting-democrats-promise-to-tackle-gun-violence-in-congress In the words of Rahm Emanual.. "Never let a good crisis go to waste!"

Sad news, Sergeant Ron Helus was killed in the shooting. Helus, a 54-year-old father and husband, worked in the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office for 29 years and was one year away from retirement.

So we have another shooter who was well known by local LEOs, but nothing was done to intervene or get him help. Where have we seen this movie before? Police say they have "had several contacts with Mr. Long over the years for minor offenses." He was a victim of assault and battery in a bar in 2015. The police then confirmed that in April of this year, officers were called to Long's house: "officers went to his house, he was somewhat irate, acting a little irrationally." The officers then called out their Crisis Intervention Team, "and mental health specialists who met with him, talked to him, and cleared him, didn't feel he was qualified to be taken under 5150."

28 year old Marine veteran, served in Afghanistan - Machine Gunner Suffering from PTSD and mental health issues. Local Sheriff has had multiple "run-ins" with him. The sheriff described Long as irate, irrational, and said he might have been suffering from PTSD from his military background. The weapon was a 45 caliber Glock 21 and was legally obtained.” Had 30 round extended mags, reloaded at least once. Lived with his mother, known to kick walls in. Mom had lots of problems with him. https://heavy.com/news/2018/11/ian-long/

Damn... not one of those scary, evil, military, assault weapons of war... Being posted in 5, 4, 3, 2 ....

You're putting way too much thought in conspiracy theories. Politicians aren't that smart. If the Senate wanted to pass it, they would have, since it went through the House. and that's exactly what it was. Throw a small piece of red meat to the base by getting the House to vote it in, but never plan on having the Senate vote. Just enough of a meaty treat to get the 2A animals to settle down. The Repubs and Dems play for the same owners, they just wear different uniforms. Just like the Harlem Globetrotters verses the Washington Generals. Makes for good entertainment, but you always know what the outcome will be. Washington DC is exactly the same "game", and you're the spectator paying the bill.

HR-38 was passed in the House on Dec. 6, 2017. It was then passed over to the Senate. Do you really think the Senate couldn't find time between then and now to get it passed, if they wanted to?

There's a guy that gets it. If it WAS going to happen, we just had a Repub controlled Congress and White House, so did it happen? Plus, on the fairytail belief that the Senate passes it in the next few weeks, do you really think OUR communist state will it allow to be implemented without a MAJOR fight?

I gave a bunch of those to my son for his big safe. He says they work really well, inside is completely dry, and it's in his garage. Plus, when those packs get damp, you just pop them into the oven to "recharge" them.

Any possibility the boxes were damp when you put them in the safe? https://www.amazon.com/Dry-Premium-Quality-Indicating-Packets/dp/B00DYIVFGI/ref=sr_1_2_sspa?rps=1&ie=UTF8&qid=1541559058&sr=8-2-spons&keywords=silica%2Bjell%2Bpacks&refinements=p_85%3A2470955011&th=1

Actually, they're not. It's the other cars on the road, the pavement, animals and trees that are the danger.

...." If you have any friends or family members that would be interested in our organization and keeping tabs on our progress, please invite them to keep in contact with us as we progress through our construction. We hope to be up and running in early 2018! " Looks like they're going to have a difficult time hitting the opening date. Maybe they meant 2019?

That would be my bet where they got it. I use a throw away email for a few outlier polls and stuff, then all types of crap comes soon after.

Isn't that what was done two years ago? What's changed?

I looked at the High Points when looking for a carbine. I didn't like the feel and how rough the metal and finish was. Yeah, it was cheap, but since I'm not buying for the short term, I passed. I prefer a composite or polymer stock and carbines that are a little different in appearance.

You're breathing.

More good ones: In Wheeler, we addressed New Jersey's justifiable need requirement in the wake of Heller and McDonald and determined the justifiable need requirement was constitutional. 433 N.J. Super. at 616. We stated: Based upon the broad reasoning of Heller and McDonald, "we think the Second Amendment right to carry a handgun for the purpose of lawful self-defense exists or extends beyond the home. Nevertheless, we have no reason to decide that question. We are confident that New Jersey's "justifiable need" standard would not impermissibly burden the right. We can reject this challenge to the carry permit law on that ground. [Id. at 597.] In accordance with Heller, we analyzed New Jersey's justifiable need requirement under intermediate scrutiny and determined that: Intermediate scrutiny was appropriate here. The "justifiable need" component of the carry permit law does not target protected conduct. It is an effort to protect the public and accommodate those who have an objective reason to anticipate a need to use a gun in self-defense. The law targets the dangers of misuse and accidental use of handguns that unquestionably have serious, injurious consequences wholly outside the purview of self-defense. It's 9 pages long.

Oh snap, this thread topic was already started earlier:

This Lady needs more range time, unfortunately since she didn't kill him, he'll probably return for retaliation for being shot by her... ANDERSON COUNTY, S.C. – A South Carolina mother shot and injured a man accused of breaking into her home. WHNS reported that Ashley Jones shot the suspect after he kicked in her front door shortly after 6 a.m. Thursday in Anderson County. Jones said a bullet hit the man and he ran off. He’s in stable condition with non-life-threatening injuries, according to Anderson County Sheriff Chad McBride. “I would’ve killed him if I had to,” Jones said. “If I didn’t have a weapon, I wouldn’t have been able to fight him off.” https://myfox8.com/2018/11/03/south-carolina-mother-shoots-and-injures-home-invasion-suspect-i-wouldve-killed-him-if-i-had-to/