Biden renews push for assault weapons ban — and calls for safe storage law (yahoo.com)

And safe storage laws, which were already addressed in Heller.  JFC, why won't he address the root causes of firearms-related crime?  Oh, I forgot...

"Commonly Used".. I guess SCOTUS need to elaborate what that means to folks who dont have "common sense".

11 minutes ago, silverado427 said:

That didn't age well.

29 minutes ago, silverado427 said:

I don't get it...  

1 hour ago, CAL. .30 M1 said:

I don't get it...  

And if you did you probably shouldn't admit to it.

1 hour ago, silverado427 said:

This makes absolutely no sense. Unless he is trying to say that we should follow Japan's example. 1 politician for every gun.

I never want to read another sentence that starts with “Joe Biden coming..” ever again. 

Good thing we don't own any assault weapons! That pinned muzzle break on my AK makes all the difference!

17 hours ago, CAL. .30 M1 said:

I don't get it...  

Pretty sure its satire...

12 hours ago, Lawnmower2021 said:

Good thing we don't own any assault weapons! That pinned muzzle break on my AK makes all the difference!

Thank God Japan has such strict gun laws!  Now they'll have to add a law that say that you can't make shitty "firearms" from the spare parts laying around you house. 

***DELETED***

Here we go again:  House to move toward vote on assault weapons ban (yahoo.com)

1 minute ago, CMJeepster said:

Here we go again:  House to move toward vote on assault weapons ban (yahoo.com)

So can Congress make laws that go against Constitution ?

16 minutes ago, CMJeepster said:

Here we go again:  House to move toward vote on assault weapons ban (yahoo.com)

Is there text on this? Is this identical to the '94 AWB or is there more?
 

Quote

The bill, sponsored by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), would prohibit the sale, transfer, import and manufacture of hundreds of models of semi-automatic weapons that boast certain specific features, including those that combine pistol grips with detachable magazines

This implies it could go much further.

48 minutes ago, Lawnmower2021 said:

Is there text on this? Is this identical to the '94 AWB or is there more?

As far as I can tell, it's this one:  Cicilline, Feinstein Introduce Assault Weapons Ban | Congressman David Cicilline (house.gov)

Feinstein? Shocking.

3 minutes ago, Bellasdaddy said:

Feinstein? Shocking.

Even Hell doesnt want some people.

1 hour ago, Bellasdaddy said:

Feinstein? Shocking.

Hopefully they won't pass it as a tribute to her retirement.

Video of Ronny Jackson Daring Biden to Come Take His AR-15 Viewed 1M Times (msn.com)

So guys, who do we write about this kind of thing? Is it the same as who we'd write about things local to NJ?

11 minutes ago, Lawnmower2021 said:

So guys, who do we write about this kind of thing? Is it the same as who we'd write about things local to NJ?

 

Pointless waste of effort. Booker and Menendez want this shit, same as the rest of Njs democrat representatives. The only two, Smith and VanDrew already vote this stuff down... Maybe write them to let them know you have their back. 

If these people actually listened, and not just pretended, it might be worth something, even if they didn't change their minds. But your letters go right into the trash. 

My rep, Sherrill, gives zero shit about anything not on the democratic agenda. In fact, when she meets with constituents, they are mostly hand picked union reps. 

House Judiciary to hold hearing on assault weapons ban. Here's what we know about the bill (yahoo.com)

On 7/11/2022 at 3:07 PM, CJack said:

"Commonly Used".. I guess SCOTUS need to elaborate what that means to folks who dont have "common sense".

I mean it's not ambiguous. They specified semi-automatic handguns are in common use, and the bill would ban them, so....

Just now, raz-0 said:

I mean it's not ambiguous. They specified semi-automatic handguns are in common use, and the bill would ban them, so....

Then the bill itself got to be unconstitutional and thrown out even IF the bill come to pass, is it ?

 

Just now, CJack said:

Then the bill itself got to be unconstitutional and thrown out even IF the bill come to pass, is it ?

 

It likely won't make it out of committee in the senate as it exists, but in theory it'd be the fast track to scotus, and be dumped if it has 5 votes to dump it. Then all AWBs would be dead if the ruling was broad enough. 

On 7/12/2022 at 4:28 PM, silverado427 said:

he is however forgetting the crazed leftist that tried to kill repubs at a ball game.

4 hours ago, CJack said:

Then the bill itself got to be unconstitutional and thrown out even IF the bill come to pass, is it ?

 

https://streamable.com/fyktsq

Watch that. 

 

Well come on man! We can't have WEAPONS OF WAR in common use!

Ian McKelvey takes mockery of Rep. Lucy McBath’s assault rifle comments (exploding skulls, really?) to a whole new HILARIOUS level in epic thread – twitchy.com

Some of these are pretty funny. Lucy was just stupid.