Shane45

-up-

Not a lawyer here, just applying my own logic. If you sign it as is, you essentially agreed to waive your rights? If you strike it and sign it, at least you can stand on the ground that, even though it is a rented home, it is still your home which you will not sign away your constitutional right. Your rights garner greater protection in your home from what i remeber of consitutional law.

Strike it out, sign it and dont say anything. If it becomes an issue they will look at the lease and find it stricken

Specopsscout is correct. Getting behind the stock is the best way. The AI seems to be a love it or hate it affair. Im the only one I know that was in the middle! It wasnt that comfortable but I shot it well. Tha McMillan and Manners were the most comfortable for me. Never could warm up to the Mcrees or the state arms stocks which are very similer.

Do the benefits outweigh the negatives? Shorter, check better optics mounting options, check less wieght or more? Unknown worse trigger, has to be since its a bullpup weak side shooting, common bullpup issue doesnt look like its free floating anything and how is that toprail attached. is it juct clam shelling the reciever? Could mean a real issue with precision shooting and repeatability. I think that unless I read a range report from a trusted source, I dont see the value in the effort or pursuit of this solution. The cost of the chassis and a doner M1a make it an unworthy pursuit in my mind unless you absiolutely have to have a 308 that looks like its out of a video game.

No takers???

I like BLF's too. I guess I picked armament over arms due to the definition. I already own the domains bryantarmament and t1products so I should be good. Thanks.

I was all set on Bryant Armament for long enough to go buy te domain etc etc but my only hesitation is how many people have trouble spelling armament!!! Maybe Ill keep BAC and make the product line T1P. The wife didnt like Tier One Tools

WTF? Over!

For sale is a new US Optics 1-4 scope with circle chevron CQB style reticle. Illumination is red. Included but not pictured is a US Optics 8 screw mount. Price is $1100 FTF. Heres some pics.

Well, I think I am going to pull a new business name and dump everything under one name so to speak. It will encompass manufacturing and gunsmithing to some degree. All in the firearms industry. I need 3 names to submit for my LLC. Id like some feedback so here are some of my front runners. Tier One Products. T1P Bryant Armament Corp. BAC Serengeti Rules Corp. SRC

Unfortunatly im not Thanks though.

IMO the price of the SCAR16 will drop if/when the next gen with non riciprocating charging handle is released or the version that can go 5.56 or 7.62.

DA stop confusing value with cost!!!!!!!!!!!! Value is right where the market places it. If you have no problem selling all you produce, then the value is spot on! If your sitting on a bunch of them then the value is not there in the market and your cost is too high.... "To some, it may be worth it. I don't put anywhere near the round counts on my rifles as other do, so for me it's a bit more questionable" Correct! The value YOU place on the rifle is proportionate to your needs and it likely enters the catagory of diminished returns to exceed that cost.......

If I had to use car comparisons, the SCAR would be a Hummer H1, the ACR an H3 and a glock would be a civic

LOL

Hey theres always a 16" 308

So no worries for the other guy then

My time behind a .260 was rather short so im not the authority but I dont think I would go below 22". IIRC the 260 needs the barrle length or you start giving up a lot of the advantage it has over 308.

So what happens when some dude cuts loose with a shotty at the zombie walk and his defence is well the CDC said to be prepared! LOL

The fact is Ray, its a good thing for everyone when debates and discusions remaine civil! If its uninteresting to you just skip the thread. But if just one person learned something or got a better idea on what consideration are made in bringing a product to market, then I dont mind discussing it.

DA did you hear something? Weird, sounded like a Rachel Ray cooking show. Anyway, yes the M24 is what I had in mind. That was a pretty looong contract for a lot of rifles and suppt.

Well you have to remember that FN supplies A LOT to the govt. "Remington really lags when it comes to gov't contracts" Im curious what makes you say this?

Yes I would agree that CS has waxed and waned. But in the new model of distributed manufacturing, it may not matter if they have the capability to meet the entire demand themselves. But as an aside, if you get a good XCR it seems to be a solid rifle. Unfortunatley when I had mine it did not have the stock options it has today and the original stock is something I did wrestle a lot with.

And that is exactly the concerns that come from licensing models.... remember compliance is simply as srong as your bank account to fund legal action!