JackDaWack

I understand people have this perception of paterson...being some gun banging hoe of a city, but the reality is... paterson aint that bad. I went to school in Newark for a year and p-town don't even come close to the times i've wondered what the hell am i doing here. I drive through Paterson regularly for work, and sometimes i have to stop there, honestly u guys sound like a bunch of little girls. It's not bad at all unless your in the projects, and there arent any reputable stores in the projects one would venture too. I've been to bars out there too and unless you park in a shady alley your fine. Like some one said this in on the Clifton side of paterson, some parts you cant even tell when you go into clifton. So reality wise, if theres something wrong with going to this part of paterson, you might want to steer clear of clifton too.

If he's willing to wait.

That's how you do it.. When the FID and permit comes in, Fill out the P2P and follow the directions to send the 2 copies to state and local police, keep one copy each. Thats it, private sale. However, she must buy the gun for herself, and then decide she wants to sell it.. keep that in mind, it illegal to buy a firearm for someone else in NJ with out FID. wink wink The question comes up on one of the forms she will fill out when purchasing the firearm.

I really don't want to blow up my ammo source, but auction arms has a great supplier of federal 9mm luger. I picked up a case of 1K for $195 free shipping. You have to bid to buy, but i havent seen it go over 200 a case. That's well over 100 bucks in savings if you were to buy it by the box in NJ. Plus you dont have to drive out to Delaware to buy.

Now that's how you prepare for SHTF scenario.

Yes. All you need is a legal form stating you were the person to which the guns would be willed to. With out it there is no way to prove where they came from. **If you can get in touch with the lawyer who took care of your grandfathers will, i would do so and see what he says.

My vote goes to the Beretta 92 Inox, but of course my opinion is purely biased lol. Simple yet elegant. I would have picked it up instead of my M9A1, but i figured i would get a good defense weapon before i got one that shined my position away. Get the grey hogue grips and your in business.

To the best of my knowledge you would need to have it transferred to you, by the beneficiary of his estate. So that would mean you grandmother, if still alive, or one there children. This would mean you would need an FID in the state of NJ, and you would need an COE to be completed by you and the seller. I'm not entirely sure, but the lawyer may be able to pull some strings and grant the fire arm to be willed to you, in other words, if people in your family say that he wanted it to go to you, you may be able to prove that regardless of the actual will, the firearm was intended to be willed to you. However, if its a case of, no one knows, and no one wants it who was the beneficiary, the lawyer may not want to get in the middle of deciding who gets it, since he really doesnt know, and would just default on the primary beneficiary to avoid a lawsuit, cause its possible some one may change there mind and feel they got screwed.

Well in short yes it can, to what degree depends on the conditions. For instance soil with varying ph concentrations may leach lead quicker/slower, or whether the bullet is intact or in in small pieces giving more surface area. Many factors. The questions is, these places can pick up after themselves, and in the wild, is enough lead being deposited to even make a significant impact, my guess probably not. Here's a good read. http://www.princeton.edu/~rmizzo/firingrange.htm I see no reason not to hold standards on lead, but to ban it seems ridiculous.

edit.DP

I understand where there coming from, being a biologist myself. However, i see no real hard data based on there compliant. They know all to well that they need some hard data if they want to make anything happen regarding the issue, you cant say oh well its going to poison the wildlife... since lead has been used for so many years they have plenty of ways to test the impact lead has on the environment. I would have to say the biggest concern for me, this personally the way i view the topic, would be outdoor ranges that don't properly clean up, and an accumulation of lead could lead to toxic levels of run off water. Personally i'm all about the environment, not one of those tree huggers, however, through my own education i have be continuously told that unless there is statistical data to support a given topic, no matter what it may be, no real conclusion can be made. The EPA can only fight something if they have sufficient supporting data, which it looks like they didn't. For them to be sued by a group, and one that in particular knows very well why the EPA dropped the case, makes absolutely no sense. I could see a group who is pro-gun control getting the panties in a twist, but in real life this is one of those groups who should have been contributing data to the cause, not saying the EPA didnt do the job because the rest of the scientific community found no reason to ban lead. Im going to go out on a limb here and say... some one contributed a lot of money to this organization so there voice could be herd, because if the EPA couldn't hold up the case, there is no way in hell this group will. All semester i have been doing research projects on these types of issues, although regarding plants, the basic principles are all the same regarding journal articles. Like said if something was significant, you would find a lead controversy article in a ecology journal, which found significant statistical data, which shows how lead impacts the environment... From what i can find no such article exists, where no one has tested a hypothesis, or other have come up empty handed with mixed results, its all the same, either find the issue or shut up, no one wants to hear your personal opinion. This is where the global warming debate fits in, people have been fighting for and against, but the reality is if you bothered to look at how the earth systems work, you would realize it is about 1000X more complicated then taking a for and against position. And 99% of the time the people who actually have something to say, have no idea what there talking about. I dont want to get into a science lesson here, but the point is with out data, all you have is an opinion. In the scientific community a opinion is worth a hand full of jelly beans.

That is if you got the tools..

This case is not about the individuals filing suit, they are not suing the state to get ccw permits, they are fighting the legality of the law. If it was the way you claim it to be it would not be a civil suit, it would be an appeal.

I was gonna say the same thing, it seems the states get some right, and feds get some right, for the most part they both get a lot wrong. Take Medical MJ for example.... despite all the research, and im talking about hands down proof it's a viable solution to help patients, FEDs still keep it under class 1 controlled substance, right next to heroin.. meaning a cancer patient can go to jail for trying to alleviate some pain. Put that into gun control aspect, you get one viable movement to ban guns, and its over for everyone.

My friend is actually having this problem as we speak. i told him to call the NJSP and ask what the deal was since his PD keeps saying we havnt received the background check yet. The NJSP firmly stated it takes about 3 days, thats 3 DAYS! for them to file the check and send it out. He then called the cheif of police and explained to him the situation the Lt. was BSing him, got a call back almost immediately and it is now being taken care of. NJSP will not give out info regarding a background check, but they will tell you the same thing they told my friend, normally 3days is all it takes from the initial request. This was a call made today, so this info is accurate. So what does this mean... it means the PD has had his background check for months! Since morpho sends out the prints....that means they have had it since then end of august. meaning they have been outright lying to him for 3 months. FYI they will throw every excuse at you if you bring up the 30 day rule, they will literally rip up and throw away a reference letter, just to say they never got it, wham that's all they need to be exempt from the law... I'm not knockin the PoPo, god knows my PD was excellent in regards, but some of them are just really messed up.

The TLR1 is really bright for its size the TLR1s is even brighter. Added bonus a laser sight.

Hey pat my rock river arms came in!! We need to head to the range when ur noveske comes in.

Ok, Me now part of the club! Rock River Arms Lar-15 Operator2 Elite-mid system Flip front sight RRA Dom2 rear sight W/ mount rail for eotech 2-stage trigger perm. attached rra muzzle break Operator fixed stock w/ battery compartment Ergo sure grip 1:9 chrome molly chrome bolt carrier I ordered through Pete over at ar15sales.com nice guy to do business with great price on a gun that was already on sale too. Saving up for an aimpoint or eotech now.. The rear sight is actually set up for co-witness already for an eotech. I need my friend to take some proper pictures, not cell phone crappy ones.

My father always said career politicians are the worst kind of criminal. How can you trust someone who makes there living on being a politician? you cant! I'm not saying there aren't decent ones out there, but if you want to get elected you have to play ball, no one will contribute to your campaign who doesn't have an agenda, and those agenda's are almost always personal. It's been like this for a very long time, and there doesnt seem to be any chance of change in the near future. People fail to realize that this is there job, there not in there position to help people, they are there to make money. What pisses me off is they dont even try to hide it, take that scum Joe Biden for instance. While the real estate market was crashing..still is... A mortgage company sold him a multi million dollar home for cents on the dollar, he turned around and sold it back to them for an insane amount... i wonder why that happened? Im just saying personal preference has nothing to do with it, if some one hated guns and couldnt find a pro- gun control group(which would never happen) they would change there stance very quickly just to get contributions. Take christie for instance, he was pro gun control, u really think that **** would fly in the big leauges of politics being a republican. It has nothing to do with what you know and how you can apply it, if you know a lot about fire arms, that doesnt make you a good choice for a rep. It may actually make you the worst choice, becuase you can think logically on the matter, and when you up against illogical people, logic doesnt work.

Why.. so the poor lady helping out has to clean it..lol. Now if it were going to the PoPo that would be a different story.

I would have to 100% disagree with this statement, while one may be preferred over the other, quality and reliability is of no significant difference.

If you need a place to ship to that will do gunsmithing, paterson gunsmithing accepts non-legal AR's and will make it legal. I called a bunch of places in North Jersey and they were one of the only ones i could find. On another note, i just ordered a AWB compliant AR from Rock River Arms, i believe they sell AWB uppers and will ship to your house, you can customize your order with them too. There are a ton of options out there.

It's only illegal when paired with one of the other options, so yeah if they ship out an upper with a bayonet lug and a threaded barrel there may be an issue. However just like you said how are they to know that the lower will not have a pistol grip? It's at there discretion, when i was trying to order my pistol they wouldnt send it to NJ because of the 17rd clips, even tho i specifically said my ffl would dispose of them, there wasn't really a legal issue there, but they just wouldnt ship it for what ever reason. So if the upper has only one of the things on the list, it should be 100% legal, what ever lower u use is up to you and its your responsibility to make sure its legal. Just for an example, you buy adjustable stocks in NJ, even though there illegal on an AR or rifle with a pistol grip. Since the lower is the only FFl required part, thats really the only part that gets heavily scrutinized. People build there own AR's all the time, order threaded barrels and gas blocks with bayo lugs, they get them smithed and legalized, and then complete the build. i guess you wont know until you try. Most sites you will look at to purchase usually state what states they will not ship to, i've never seen NJ on a list tho.

We cant even get the names of the contributors to the mosque being built in NYC.... but oh god they want the names of ppl contributing to keeping our rights....i mean privileges

I didn't realize it was that easy to get a certificate of exemption...What the hell was the point of the 30 day law, man this state is tarted.