Soju

Don't be a pussy.

'Firearm' is defined in the statutes. 'Loaded/unloaded' is not however. (that I know of)

1/3 of all states have decriminalized marijuana, so whether you agree or not, my notion of not prosecuting non-violent drug offenders is at least somewhat substantiated. With that said... Now that you have sufficiently misrepresented my initial post, and that we both have sufficiently derailed this thread, I'm going to bow out.

Hell froze over in 2004 when the Red Sox came back from 3 down vs. the Yankmees in route to becoming World Series Champions.

I agree with the above. In this lovely state, where we are arbitrarily prevented from using something that makes it nicer for the shooter, we get these super quiet muzzle breaks that redirect the blast off to the sides...directly toward are fellow shooters in the lanes next to us. Isn't it great?

You are losing me. If you cannot recognize some of the differences between a drug dealing thug and a hippy, I'm not sure what else to say. I also didn't mention anything of ethnicity or social status. You chose to make that conclusion. But if you'd like to ignore the elephant in the room, that there is a certain category of people who are far and away more involved in the drug dealing gang banging life, knock yourself out. It exists. I can't speak for TN law either. I was simply showing an example.

I agree, that is a pretty neat idea. It certainly beats tossing them in the closet or something.

I'd have to wonder why they aren't being prosecuted for that, but I can imagine there are valid reasons like lack of evidence and whatnot, but those certainly aren't the type of individuals I was referring to. I think it is safe to say the gang banger thugs who get busted on drug charges are usually relatively easily distinguishable from the hippy stoner type who's biggest crime is eating all his friends food. And come on, I find it hard to believe that the 500,000 people in prison for drug charges are all violent criminals. Unjust laws are not laws and should not be enforced. On the other hand, you have examples like this, in which people trafficking money for drug cartels (presumably) don't even get arrested.

No idea. Doesn't matter, because it isn't a requirement per FOPA. I am still amazed that people are still giving out wrong information, especially people who have been on this forum long enough. Just look up the darn code!!!

10 Reason not to talk to police

It sounds like stop prosecuting non-violent drug offenders as opposed to legalizing drugs. I'm not sure what I am missing. That doesn't sound very non-violent to me.

Where did I say anything about that? Maybe you misunderstood, because I certainly didn't say anything about drug dealers becoming doctors, or users stopping. That is absurd. Heck, I didn't even say ANYTHING about legalizing drugs. What post did you read?

"... the reason we can’t have a rational gun debate is because the anti-gun side pre-supposes that their pro-gun opponents must first accept that guns are bad in order to have a discussion about guns in the first place. Before we even start the conversation, we’re the bad guys and we have to admit it." Nailed it.

30 posts ago... 9 posts ago... Nope!

I bet if they decided to stop prosecuting the half a million plus non-violent drug offenders the system wouldn't be so clogged and the prisons wouldn't be overcrowded. But nah...those for profit, private prisons wouldn't make as much money, and therefore the politicians who get money from them/their lobbyists wouldn't make as much money. Can't have that now. Real crime doesn't pay.

That should have been the end? You are saying a guy who just unloaded 40 rounds at you, who is on a knee still holding a rifle, is no longer a threat, because he may have been shot? As critical as I usually am of cops, I don't see how anything they did could have been construed as inappropriate. It ended exactly where it should have. With the suspect on the ground no longer holding a firearm.

Yes, make sure you have a proper weight buffer for your specific gas system and barrel length. How was ejection in terms of distance and direction?

Full video below. NSFW. www. youtube. com/watch?v=ADHoBijaqNU It looks like he had already got hit, and was injured, hence him dropping do a knee. At that point it appears an officer reloads and shoots until the lunatic is no longer a threat. Also, it appears an armed citizen that is out of the frame of the video (presumably to the left) comes to assist the officers. You can hear another male voice say something I can't quite make out, but sounds like "Don't shoot, are you okay?". You can then hear him say "I have a pistol. How bad you hit?"

Yep. Sad. MC-12, April 27, near Kandahar, Afghanistan. 747, April 29, Bagram , Afghanistan. KC-135, May 3, near Chaldovar, Kyrgyzstan. http://photos.denver...-in-kyrgyzstan/ http://www.airforcet...2-crash-victims

Nope. About the only thing to need to know when it comes to a bag, is that it closes, which pretty much every bag does. And if you have a vehicle with a trunk, it doesn't even need to be able to do that...

Reminded me of this. and...

Fact and fact!

Yep, .223/5.56 comes in boxes of 20 usually. To be honest, I'm not really sure what a good price is right now. I haven't bought any since the craziness. Before it, a good price was $.30/rd or less. Now it appears to be about $.60/rd. I'd say anything $.55/rd or less would be excellent, but like I said, I'm really not sure.

Right now...anything you can find for a price that won't sneak into your bed after you fall asleep and rape you.

Well isn't that the pot calling the kettle black.