Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

New Jersey Gun Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Soju

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Soju

  1. Exactly.That is my point, and as that is not what you said before, is the reason I made it...
  2. So I recently have watched nothing but Foreign films, all but a couple being Asian films. I have to say, these movies are some of the craziest movies I have ever seen. Almost everyone had a 'WTF!' moment in it. Actually, most ended with me thinking 'WTF was that!' I must admit though, some of these movies are up there with the best of any movie I have ever seen. So if you are interested in just excellent films, or something that will leave you confused or shocked, you may want to take a look. City of God (Brazil). This movie takes place in Rio de Janeiro and deals with the violence and general power and control of the gangs in the city. The movie is simply incredible. It has long been one of my favorite movies of any sorts. It is worth watching. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0317248/ Battle Royale (Japan) Again, I saw this years ago. The basic premise is that in order to get the youth motivated after the economy collapsed largely due to them, a middle/high school class is kidnapped, brought to an island, and forced to play a game where they kill each other. If they don't, or don't follow the rules, a collar around their neck will explode killing them. Seems like a crazy plot that couldn't be much more then some ridiculous violence right? Well, there is surprisingly a lot more too it. It is both funny and depressing, and filled with mixed emotions, while maintaining a level of pure badass-ery. Watch it. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0266308/ Audition (Japan) Probably the most messed up movie I have ever seen. If you know nothing about it, it will surprise you like no other. If you do, it still will destroy you. It starts off kind of slow, like almost a strangely placed love story that seems a bit off. I was a bit creeped out, and knew something was going to happen. And boy did it. I still have no idea what was real and what wasn't. In fact, this movie is what prompted me to start this thread. I am not sure it could have been more 'WTF'. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0235198/ J.S.A: Joint Security Area (Korea) Probably the only of the Asian movies that wasn't WTF. This movie was absolutely incredible. Basic idea is a South Korean soldier kills two North Koreans just over the border on the NK side. SK says he was kidnapped and killed them escaping. NK says he went over on his own. A Swiss and Swedish investigator are brought in. The truth is something neither side wants to hear. If you watch any of these movies, watch this one. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0260991/ Old Boy (Korea) Another one of my favorite movies. Without saying much, a man is kiddnapped and imprisoned for 15 years. Finally, he is released. He doesn't know who did it, or why, and his goal is to find out. Simple right? Hell no! When you find out the reason, and what has happened/happening, it's pure WTF! Go watch this. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364569/ Sympathy for Lady Vengeance (Korea) Same director as Old Boy, and follows the same revenge theme. Another well done movie of similar proportions. Not quite, but almost as incredible. Basic plot is, a woman is released from prison after serving 13 years for a murder she confessed to. You find out right away that she, though involved, was not the murderer. Her goal is to get revenge on the real killer. Again, seems straight forward, but it is not. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0451094/ Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance (Korea) The first of the 3 movies (the two above). I found this the least enjoyable, but was still good. To put it simply, it is a movie where one bad decision spirals out of control and leaves pretty much everybody in the movie seeking revenge on each other. It reminds me of 'The Square' in the sense that one bad choice for perceived good intentions turns everything to crap. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310775/ The Isle (Korea) Sort of confusing. Kind of an artsy type film with characters of questionable morals and intentions, loneliness, with a few WTF moments. It ended with me having no idea what I just watched. But it was entertaining. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0255589/ Samaritan Girl (Korea) From the same director as The Isle. Confusing to the extend where you aren't sure the exact motive behind what the characters are doing, so seems unlikely they would actual take the course of action they do. However it does deliver some strong emotions, and I found the movie to be totally depressing. I don't know if I liked the movie or not because of such. Another movie where I'm left wondering WTF I just watched. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0397619/ The Square (Australia) Basically, a guy makes one bad choice, and everything spirals way out of control, leading to all sorts of bad things. Entirely depressing. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1085507/ Animal Kingdom (Australia) After a teenagers mother dies, he goes to live with his cold hearted grandmother and uncles. His uncles are criminals, and by virtue of his association with them, gets caught up in the mess, and his family turns on him. Also a depressing movie, but not too badly. It is very well done. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1313092/
  3. I'm simply saying that if weed was legal, he would NOT have done this. That it is illegal certainly played a role. But attributing the reason for it simply because one thinks weed is bad, is not likely to be the case, as has been suggested.
  4. I agree. Wait, are you talking about the cops or the protesters? Well, when you discount any and all evidence that hurts your position, it is easy to say everything is biased! Since actual video of events is biased, what is unbiased? Again, no need to answer. But you can if you wish. I'll enjoy reading what logical fallacy you come up with next or what method you use to avoid and deflect. My bet is on sticking with claiming everything is a conspiracy and calling people names system you generally use.
  5. Why did you bother posting then? Is charging people and arresting the vocal non violent protesters standard too? No need to answer.
  6. Nothing to see here. Move along.
  7. Not really. We all know that in order to support same sex marriage, you also have to be a supporter of gang violence!
  8. I am kind of irritated. Seeing this makes me kind of upset that the AF won't let us put pin-up girls and other paintings on our birds anymore! Why not?!? Lameooooo. Great photos. I'm curious as to how the flying was back then. Crazy how different things are and how much they've changed.
  9. And you're the one talking about critical thinking.... So is weed the problem, or the fact it is illegal the problem? How much you want to bet that if it was legal he wouldn't have ran over the cars? Don't answer, it is rhetoric. Haha Yes!
  10. Are you suggesting that getting high was the reason for this? Doing some critical thinking of my own, I'd say he probably did it because he was angry with the police....
  11. She must be a real keeper!
  12. Yes. It isn't a very long bill either. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr645/text If they don't exist then that would be a violation of the law. What are they used for? Don't know, but they can be used for absolutely anything at the discretion of DHS, so who knows.
  13. What military exemption are you talking about? There are none that apply to military as private gun owners.
  14. That is good to know (court ruling) and disturbing to hear (position of BO's & company).
  15. Yep. Congratulations and welcome to NJ, the worst state you could be stationed in.
  16. Indeed. The issue is the only thing required to become a 'covered' person is for the government to accuse you of being one. This is in fact, sort of the reason for things like 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendment. If they prove you to be such, that is a different story. The problem is, they ARE NOT EVEN REQUIRED to prove anything! That is a direct violation of the US Constitution. Even if I were to agree with it's purpose, it is still unlawful. There are ways to do things legally. This is not one of them.
  17. If it were the media I wouldn't be surprised!
  18. You didn't find it because it doesn't exist as he described it. Unfortunately he wasn't too too far off. I assume he was sensationalizing Sec. 1021: Now this is clearly unconstitutional on a number of grounds. Does not require any proof, but rather a simple accusation. Eliminates all due process for those accused, and is simply absurd. I have actually written members of Congress that voted for this bill, and was told by 2 of them that they felt this was UNconstitutional, but that there was some other good stuff in it so voted for it on those grounds. Oddly enough they did not respond when I told them they admitted to violating their oath and that I requested their immediate resignation....
  19. How come it seems every time a terrible crime happens it is now called 'terrorism'? I mean, I am not saying this case isn't, it may be, I don't have all the info, but still, it seems odd. Per the US code defining domestic terrorism Was he trying to intimindate/coerce people? Seems more like he was just trying to kill them. Influence government policy? Maybe if it turns out he did so because of a political/governmental issue, then I suppose it would be. Affect the conduct of a government? Not sure what conduct he is affecting. If he does affect the conduct, and though unintentionally, does that still qualify? I guess I'm just confused. On one had it seems like he had an issue with Sikhism, so it could be considered that he was terrorizing Sikhs, but even that doesn't fit the definition of domestic terrorism as defined in the code? I don't know, maybe it does. Terrible incident. WTF is wrong with people?!?!
  20. Of course not. Just like a future event has somehow already been proven to not happen........................... Adam is clearly a time traveler from the future.
  21. Yes and no. It sounds like that, and somebody has already made a parody video for it. But no, he isn't actually saying that. Either way, it does not detract from the awesomeness that is that video and song.
  22. They get frustrated and demand you tell them anyways or they arrest you for obstruction or something else they feel like. The Constitution, laws, and statutes are frequently not followed. You can object but often you are told "well you can make that argument to the judge." They don't need a warrant when they can use force instead. That is usually easier. Or maybe on the chance you deal with somebody who does respect your rights, nothing happens. Not as likely though.
  23. As a matter of point, you are claiming I hold a position I never claimed to hold. I haven't said what my position has been on most of these topics. You also say "not one single shred of real evidence", only because you have chose to ignore all evidence, or claim some other sort of reason why it invalid, using logical fallacies. You only chose to attack the person rather then the subject, in an emotional response type fashion. Saying something is 'ridiculous' or 'disrespects my country' have no factual basis on an argument. That is called an ad hominem fallacy, where you chose to attack a person rather then their argument. Somebody could be the biggest POS in the world, but that alone has no bearing on the argument that person may make. You continue to misrepresent my position entirely, even though I've spelled it out. I never claimed everything has a conspiracy behind it. I have stated over and over that just because you don't like something, doesn't mean that possibility CANnot exist. Again, you do nothing but hide behind somewhat apparent fallacies, ignore any facts contrary to your positions, and attack the person rather than the argument. The fact that you are admitting that based off of emotion alone you won't even consider something, shows you don't even care how much evidence is shown, you won't believe it. I am well aware you can't and won't even try and look at something from another perspective besides your own, and you have a fixed opinion. That is fine. Your choice of willful ignorance is your own.
  24. "911 what is your emergency?" "yeah...uhh, you might want to have one of your officers walk outside." "walk outside?" "yes, in fact, they will probably be doing a lot of walking now" "a lot of walking? why is that? what is going on" "hold on, I gotta get my camera out, this guy is running over..." "Did you just say a man got run over?" "...running over all the cop cars with a tractor." "Sheeiiittt....."

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.