Soju

That's just his normal deck lighting!

You can wear it, concealed or openly, it does not matter. You can have it hidden in a desk drawer, sitting behind the counter in the open, or however you want really. Point being, if they are your shops, you can carry it in whatever method suits you best, and you are not restricted to just one method. Good luck getting your pistol and good luck with your shops!

Ahh, I misunderstood the context of his post...as there was none to go off of. That makes sense. Quite different from what I thought he was talking about.

Let me know how it turns out. I let someone shoot mine, and it never got shot, because he put the magazine in backwards. I had to take the entire thing apart. I thought I put it back together properly, but I guess not. Now, it will not fully cycle, and fails to return all the way to battery without a whack. Not sure what I did wrong. Too many little parts...

Care to explain? From my experience being in the aviation community the pilots are generally the biggest reason flights get moving. They deal with a hell of a lot more then most people realize. And considering commercial pilots jobs are to get hundreds of people from point a to point b safely, their decisions to go or not go are not taken lightly.

Well, if you have your FPID, and it is the same address, and you told them this, then you were lied to. Plain and simple. You do NOT need to get an FPID EVER again as long as you live at the same address. Do NOT reapply for an FPID. You will be wasting your time and money. Apply for a P2P only. I seriously hope either you misunderstood them, or they misunderstood you. If not, there is no excuse for them scamming you. I also am a bit upset that many places are requiring people to get reprinted. If it was a simple as you getting it done right there at the station, for free, then whatever. But to have to deal with Sagem Morphos or whatever the heck they are called, and pay again for something that is NOT REQUIRED, is BS. The statute wouldn't have specifically said it isn't required to be redone, if they intended people to have to get reprinted all the time. Forcing people to do so can only be do add additional hassle for people to obtain firearms or do generate additional revenue. If I'm missing another reason please let me know.

I feel like Taurus gets more crap than they deserve. It is like someone hears a bad story about Taurus, and now that one bad story turns into a hundred and all Taurus pistols suck. Many times this is spread by people with no first hand experience with any Taurus firearms. Now I know I don't shoot as much as many, or 'run' by firearms as 'hard' as many, but I have nothing but positive to say for by PT1911. Bought it used, have 1286 rounds through it, and it has worked just fine. Don't know anything about their revolvers though.

If I were to bet on it, it didn't happen as reported.

This is quite on point. Another reason why people are hesitant to not follow illegal orders or simply, to follow the Constitution, is because it makes things even more challenging when those above you are telling you if you don't that YOU will get in trouble, and threaten you, when all you are trying to do is the right thing! Not everyone has the balls to ignore them and give them the proverbial eff you. It is quite difficult. Consider a brand new police officer, or newly enlisted member of the military, being told to do x (violate the constitution somehow), and they are told by their commander/superintendent/chief/superior/etc that they will be fired/face a court martial if they don't listen. That is a tough spot to be in. Unfortunately it does happen.

"Policing in a democracy is not easy, nor is it meant to be. Reducing crime numbers is simple if you disregard basic rights, ignore victims, mandate quotas and manipulate numbers."

All said by someone who already doesn't have to play by the same rules as most of us, and on something that wouldn't effect him. It's easy to support something that doesn't effect you. After all, why would you care if an innocent law abiding citizen gets adversely effected unless that innocent law abiding citizen is you?

Who does?

So the state charges FFL's for a free check, who then, in turn, charge your, for the free check only because they are being charged. So like I said.. :You get charged $15 for a free check? What other states do this?

Old news. Even older when you consider the source. Alex Jones and infowars has been saying this for years. Unfortunately they aren't exactly wrong. I kind of though he and infowars were a bit out there. Then I just read some of the bills and things they refer to. Straight from the .gov. Turns out, even when they twist things to extremes, the basis of what they are saying is true. Sad really. Try for yourself.

I hate flying commercially. Fortunately I've learned some tricks along the way to make it less painless. 1. Drink enough to get a buzz going. Everything is always more fun when you drink. 2. Don't be afraid to take that open emergency row seat. Be persistent. Even if it is someone else's assigned seat, they will sometimes just give it up. If not, you didn't lose anything. 3. Build rapport with the flight attendants. They often hate dealing with annoying people, or just get bored on longer flights, and if they aren't total biotches, may welcome the company. Ask them to show you around the jet. When you get to the galley or someplace with some room, don't leave. 4. If it is a flight where they have open seating, like Southwest, do not sit in the very front. Go about 2/3 the way back. On less full flights, you should have no problem getting your own row. On fuller flights, but not entirely full, most people sit in the front first. When the plane starts to fill up, will continue to go farther back with the hopes of finding more room, and go right past you. Place your bag in the middle seat of the row, so it looks occupied. If you realize you have no chance of keeping it open, move it out of the way when someone you wouldn't mind sitting next to you approaches. Make it appear like a good seat to them, and a terrible seat to others. 5. Take an ambien or other sleeping pill, or just try and be tired for the flight. It won't bother you if you are not conscious. And makes time go by faster. 6. Don't let those annoying people bother you. If they are annoying you, they are annoying others. Find the other people who seem friendly buy annoyed, and make fun of the annoying ones. Everyone likes talking crap about people they don't know. 7. Try and spot someone who seems a bit uneasy about flying. Tell them you either a) fly all the time or, b) are a pilot or other flying related job. Make them feel comfortable. Then, when anything happens, act like that is NOT normal, and get a little nervous yourself. This will scare the crap out of them, but is funny as hell.

Flaw or scam? Why else would the statute say it is not required, if it wasn't required? It wouldn't matter much if it said "finger printing again is not authorized" or something else. The statues aren't followed as it is. That isn't a flaw or loophole. It is a scam in a rigged system.

Wait, you have to pay an extra $15 dollars every time you buy a firearm for a free check done over the phone?

Did you prove your identity? Did you receive fingerprints after applying with the same jurisdiction? Then you are not required to be fingerprinted again.

I'm not sure I remember my best stories, however the ones I sort of remember always seem to be really awesome...until someone tells me what really happened. There are always let downs. If it wasn't for others injecting facts I would be convinced that I have the ability to slow down time, speak German, and that gravity sometimes doesn't effect me. Apparently though, none of those things are true.

You need to replace that picture of an AR with an actual AR. Now that would be legit!

Well, it gives the illusion of doing something...

We all have stories bro. We all have stories.

Not to sound too cynical, but your life doesn't seem that crazy...

I actually got number 5 right and was wonder what so so bad about the word pulse. That is funny though.

Actually, yes. There have been instances quite similar (though to a significantly lower scale). I know of at least one example of an officer being held in contempt, and the only thing he got was that he had to apologize. That is it. And oh yeah, he was told not even to do that, and the sheriff got the judge fired. Well actually he got the DA to charge the judge with felonies. So yep. I suppose it would be more similar if Holder then charged congress with something. Wouldn't that be (ironic) funny! And that resulted in the below.