Zed's_Dead

Yeah, but who has to take Trenton? I grew up in NYC and North Jersey and anything south of Edison was "South Jersey" to me. But now that I've lived in the Cherry Hill area for 20 odd years, Trenton seems like North Jersey lol.

w00t!

I'd suggest you apply for the duplicate now. Sooner or later, someone is going to object to selling you a gun or ammo.

I didn't say it never happens. The word "reluctant" implies that it does happen. Depends where you are. I know in the courts I appear in on a fairly regular basis, that they don't do it as a matter of course.

You can have use two unsafe drivings before points are assessed within a five year period. Once you have your third, it's a 4 point ticket anyway. The statute, 39:4-97.2 give you five years before your records is basically wiped clean of them. Also, prosecutors are reluctant to downgrade 4 point tickets to unsafe driving. It happens, but not all the time.

So it's ok for us to pursue our constitutional rights to keep and bear arms, but it's not ok for alleged criminals to pursue their right to representation by an attorney? We can't have it both ways. Either our constitution and laws apply to all of us, or none of us. We devalue our own position when we try to keep others from pursuing their rights.

To the best of my knowledge, homeowner's rates are not affected by claims in the same manner motor vehicle rates are. I could be wrong...it's happened before.

This was a fun one to read!

If GZ chased the kid down, yelled in his face, and decked him, they Trayvon would have been acting in self defense. The initial attacker is not entitled to raise self defense as an issue when the person he attacks fights back.

Nice post, mcbethr While I certainly can understand your position, Jules, (my father being a NYC police officer for more than 30 years) any "animal" in this state that wants a gun gets one. They just don't go through the trouble citizens do to obtain one lawfully. If we completely banned private gun ownership in NJ, does anyone really think that gun crime would stop? Of course not. Even if all the "loopholes" that the anti's crow about were closed, bad guys would still get their guns. I don't think anyone on this forum is in favor of "anyone" being able to obtain a gun. The NICS check is certainly reasonable when buying a gun.

It's different depending on what gun you're shooting in IDPA. This http://idpa.com/Docu...uleBook2005.pdf is to the IDPA rule book. Gun classes and acceptable modifications start on page 19 I think.

Not to nitpick, but there are white Hispanics (Penelope Cruz and the overwhelming majority of Spaniards) and black Hispanics (David Ortiz and a majority of Dominicans). We apparently got around quite a bit in the 1500's - 1700's.

The comment by a reader is well done if you haven't read it yet.

Right decision , IMO, but very surprising in NJ. http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/05/12/blind-nj-man-gets-guns-back-years-after-police-confiscated-them/?fb_ref=.T680gcPzITQ.like&fb_source=home_oneline

I walked into Rayco two weeks ago and asked for a box of .38 hollowpoints (from one of the owners). He got me a box and told me the price. No sermon and no instructions. Different people will always have different experiences, but I've had nothing but good at Rayco.

Here's the update: http://www.nj.com/salem/index.ssf/2012/05/lockdown_lifted_at_penns_grove.html

Awesome pics!

While not a fan of them on my own car, best bumper sticker I ever saw said "Jesus Loves You. Everyone Else Thinks You're an Asshole". I laughed for a few miles on that one

It's happened at my kids middle school twice. Both times for suspicious characters outside the school, though. If only my son was allowed to carry his .22 to school he could've covered one corner of the building.

Maybe according to this article. http://www.guns.com/ex-nra-spokesman-creates-new-gun-group-that-supports-legalizing-pot-7456.html

http://multicatch.com/

But the bad guys are pursuing happiness by robbing people....that must be why it's ok apparently.

First of all, I wasn't referring to the original post. The original post doesn't come close to interfering with a prospective business relationship. I was imparting information to the group as a whole that there are boundaries when it comes to talking ill about a business. Second, you say yourself the OP came for feedback. Well, that's what he got even if it's not up to your discriminating standards.

Deaths of the bad guys has tripled...how is that somehow worse than someone being victimized by a scumbag? I've always been a registered democrat, but I think it's time to change that. My problem is that I'm a Republican when it comes to law and order, but more of a democrat on social issues like abortion. There are no candidates for me in NJ.

I'd be careful about going too far out of your way to blast a business you're not happy with. Keep in mind that New Jersey recognizes a tort called "interference with prospective business relationship." Below is the definitiion as espoused in a 2010 Appellate Division case. “An action for tortious interference with a prospective business relation protects the right ‘to pursue one’s business, calling or occupation free from undue influence or molestation.’” Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Elecs. Corp., 116 N.J. 739, 750 (1989) (citation omitted). To establish such a claim, plaintiff must establish: (1) a reasonable expectation of economic advantage; (2) that defendants intentionally interfered with that interest; (3) injury or loss inflicted without justification or excuse; and (4) causation. Id. at 751-52.