Where do we stand on S548 - 2018 updated assault weapons ban?

[Where do we stand on S548 - 2018 updated assault weapons ban?]

2 hours ago, capt14k said:

 

Fixed mag currently means evil feature test not needed. Thus why SKS and FN-49 except Argentine are good to go as is.

 

Going to zero evil features allowed would force people to destroy history to comply with the law. Russian AVS-36, SVT-38, SVT-40 German G43 and K43, French MAS-44, MAS-49, MAS-49/56, Egyptian Hakim and Swedish Ljungman, and I'm sure I am forgetting some. Possibly even the Garand if they interpret a clip as a magazine.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Where does a fixed mag mean an evil feature when they directly talk about a semi auto with a detachable mag

[Where do we stand on S548 - 2018 updated assault weapons ban?]

Would a fixed magizine go around the 2 "evil features" allowing you to have a telescoping stock etc because theres no more detachable mag same with a ar pistol if you were to have a non detachable  mag do those other options still apply like no more than 50oz cant have a "barrel shroud" reason I'd go with a fixed mag cause MA loaders and bf-10 loaders make basically stripper clips that'll load your mag from the side ejection port 

[AR Pistols Legal in NJ?]

So what if you turned it into a permanent fixed magizine and use ma loaders there basically stripper clips

 https://www.meanarms.com/products/detail/ma-loader-for-ar15

Or the bf 10 loaders 

https://www.bearflagdefense.com/pages/bf-10

 

And you can always get lightweight carriers and kak just introduced a 4.75" barrel on there Facebook and lightweight skeletonized uppers and lowers you think it could be done