Dan

Just hypothetically throwing this out there... Many FFL's have one price for up to 5 transfers per engagement. Of course only 1 NICS fee as well. Is it breaking any laws if say a person orders 5 rifles to the FFL/dealer, then has them transferred to him all for the one FFL charge + NICS. Then turns around and sells 4 of them to NJ citizens with valid FID's and NJDL's. Would this constitute a straw purchase or other illegal activity. I can't find anything in the statutes that is clear on it. Hypothetical purpose is saving on FFL + NICS fees for a group buy.

Jeeze, $100+NICS? That's highway robbery.

If only NJ jurors were like NYC ones... as in the ones who recently acquitted Jonathan Ryan of blatantly obvious NYC illegal possession of a handgun charges.

Order it online and have it sent to an FFL. I see you are in Woodbridge, I have a great FFL in Marlboro that I use. $42 total out the door including NICS. PM me if you want the details. Aimsurplus has a good deal on Spike's and Surplus Arms and Ammo lowers , and they already have the FFL's info.

I also promote Coscto for safe deals. I got my sentry from them, digital lock executive series. They have a great deal on the smaller one , 399 delivered My link

I suppose I have to re-read the information about the case. I was under the impression that the majority of his sentence was the result of illegal possession of a handgun, and that the whole hubub with the judge was that he would not allow the possession exemptions to be used discussed or used by the jury in their deliberation. "possession of a weapon for unlawful purposes" would mean they were able to prove that he intended to use the gun for unlawful purposes, as in committing a crime against persons or property with it.

The militarization of the police is more mental than just giving them an AR and other equipment. People direct/teach the police act like a paramilitary force, not the guns. They could get these AR's, have them in the trunk for when they need them, train up on their usage/proficiency, no harm no foul. Now if they start carrying them around as a show of intimidation when the situation doesn't warrant it, then that's just wrong. There was an instance a few years back where the police academy director told his cadets to "Go out there and kick some a**" or something to that affect. What happened to "serve and protect"? Increasingly , it appears that an "us v. them" (police v. citizens) mentality is on the rise. Treat every civilian as a threat, use force to make them submit. Not saying all LE is like that of course, just appears to be a trend.

Arguably unconstitutional laws... The same class of laws that I'm willing to bet that a large majority of NJ gun owners at one point in their gun owning life have unconsciously broke at least once , maybe more. Most likely all of this has to do with the police, prosecutor, and judge showing no consideration of the exemptions in their actions during the arrest, prosecution, and trial.. at least for the illegal possession of a handgun part. It would be interesting if he brings 2A into the argument, it could grow to something much larger. I'm lost on the search thing, as I also read that he gave permission to the police to search. Sounds like a hail Mary to try to get all the evidence thrown out , so he can have the records expunged.

I was referring to anti-gun groups , and how they will try to continue to "reasonably regulate" firearms into pea-shooters.

That would be interesting. Everyone's defense would be "It was 10 years ago". Also, it would have to be proven that the gun was illegally transferred to someone. If the cops find a person with any handgun, and provided they are not a prohibited person, and following the rules within the exemptions... how can they prove that the person had the gun originally transferred to them in the past illegally? To my knowledge , there is no law that mandates showing permit paperwork, or that a person can only posses a handgun that was "voluntarily registered" (crock of crap) as part of the Pistol Permit system.

Strap the top of the rear bench legs to the wall, preferably to a few studs.

LOL yea it does look like that from the topic. Not this kind of explosion...

I agree it is widely accepted from my research that chrome lining in barrels does to varying degrees affect accuracy of a barrel. Non-chromed barrels FTW for precision rifles IMO. Looked into this while shopping for my latest AR build.

Tony, here is a post with Solomon's info. They have strange hours, and I would call to find out what the hours of the week are, also to check to see if what you want is in stock. He's my local supply for now on as the whole $25 thing kinda stinks. It may be worth it for a big bulk purchase, otherwise not. http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/13335-reloading-in-freehold-area/page__view__findpost__p__176265

Technically covered under FOPA. Legal where you start, and legal at your destination. Just have to adhere to FOPA transportation rules until you get into Free America.

Shorter barrel, less velocity then a Cx4. 100 meters I'll buy no problem. Automatic fire out to 200meters, not so much, unless they are counting spray and pray accuracy.

Drives me crazy. I see so many "will not ship to NJ" for guns and ammo from various places on the web. Even when it is legal, or there are ways to do it legally. Another example are SA rifles that have evil features. They can ship them to an FFL, who will modify it to be NJ legal. But many places just outright don't even want to chance that. I guess the potential revenue from NJ isn't enough to warrant the trouble in learning NJ's laws.

Sounds fun. I've only been there once. Does it get waiting-list crowded on the weekends?

I agree and disagree for a few reasons. Here's where I disagree: Law abiding citizens are not to be treated like a classroom of schoolchildren " if one of you throws a block, I take all the blocks away". If someone abuses CCW, they alone are punished, not me or others who follow the laws and are responsible. State legislators will not "give us" the priveledge of carry concealed or not, it was a recognized right before the consitution, then written into it, and finally recognized for what it is. The whole premise of public safety balancing for gun control is no longer a valid argument when it comes to 2A. They cannot use that as a defense for denying non prohibited persons 2A rights. Where I agree: What they can do is enact "reasonable regulation" on the exercise of our rights, and that is where the real danger is. So I agree with you here. If a future licensed NJ CCW person commits a gun crime, the anti-gunners will use that as an example of sorts in the defense of AWB. Not that there is any legal connection, they will simply spew forth the typical rhetoric that they always do. The fact is no matter how long it takes to get CCW or carry of any sorts in this state, they will always be waiting to pounce on any misuse situation. They don't play by any rules like, " gee they did have CCW for 5 years this is the first time it happened, we'll just keep quiet on it". I highly doubt that!

I don't blame them for the 445 price a few years back, even Sig was profiting as their MSRP was even high.. back when the 556 was still "new". I stopped going to SS after they quoted me a ridiculous price on a Taurus PT709. Even after I said it was ridiculous. Prior to that, they were convenient for me being so close to where I live.

2C:39-1 o. "Sawed-off shotgun" means any shotgun having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length measured from the breech to the muzzle, or a rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length measured from the breech to the muzzle, or any firearm made from a rifle or a shotgun, whether by alteration, or otherwise, if such firearm as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches.

Noveske's Afghan and Recon barrels are both 14.5" barrels with mid-length gas systems. Am I missing something?

I bought my Sig 556 fom SS a few years ago during the Obamacraze. I paid a little more than that, and I'm pissed that I did. Regardless its a great rifle. A little heavy in the front, but super smooth to shoot with that long travel piston. edit : they are in Sayerville ;p

I think it is unconsitutional. It sets up frivolous and confusing rules and regulations without any other basis than to attempt to hinder my ability to purchase arms for my self protection, thus denying my 2a Rights. I'm not even getting into 8th amendment cruel and unusual punishment for possessing what NJ considers an "assault weapon". I mean 10 years in prison for having a stock on your gun that can move a few inches back and forth? I keep saying, this is the new battlefront for gun rights... "reasonable regulation". Who judges what is "reasonable". Unchallenged, the anti-gun rights groups will push to expand on the AWB until we can only have single shot bolt actions.

What "security reasons"? They don't want to release it because it just proves that we are in effect a no-issue state operating under the false pretenses of a shall-issue system.