September 4, 20179 yr Dingbat? Anti Second Amendment Lurker? Was that directed towards me? If so you are way off base on both. I am about the truth and it seems there is little of that being posted here. Let's try being honest the case referenced was about a divorce. The other cases he filed for Cert with the Supreme Court were about his business dealings. The reason I posted the info and docket number was to show receiving a docket number means very little. Forum members should have all the information before they decide where to donate their hard earned money. I supported this action. Posted about it on other forums. I think the past SCOTUS Petitions should have been mentioned up front. I shouldn't have stumbled across it on another forum through a Google Search. Yes it would have factored into my decision to give this even a second thought.
September 4, 20179 yr not for nuthin', but this is the kind of stuff we need to be seeing. it looks to have been stalled for a bit, but it looks like it's taking tiny forward steps. now, if only some powerful pro-2a organization would jump onboard and help these guys out. what the hell's the name of that national rifle association again? i'd bet they could help. and if they did, that'd be certain to get cynical people to sign up........ SAPPA dudes........THANKS MAN!!
September 4, 20179 yr I just found this through GOOGLE news. http://canadafreepress.com/article/our-right-to-bear-arms-has-been-stolen-and-the-supreme-court-can-now-give-i
September 4, 20179 yr I just found this through GOOGLE news. http://canadafreepress.com/article/our-right-to-bear-arms-has-been-stolen-and-the-supreme-court-can-now-give-iSigned....Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
September 5, 20179 yr 10 minutes ago, Zeke said: Signed; don't let the a holes here get you down. It's really the Bholes you have to watch out for. Btw: I had the same question as the above. It got a Docket number.. so? Is that an important milestone or an administrative blip? Context would have helped.
September 5, 20179 yr 2 minutes ago, voyager9 said: It's really the Bholes you have to watch out for. Btw: I had the same question as the above. It got a Docket number.. so? Is that an important milestone or an administrative blip? Context would have helped. How is your case coming?
September 5, 20179 yr How is your case coming?Good. Doctor gave me some ointment and said it should clear up in a few weeks as long as I stop picking the scabs off. Maybe that's a metaphor for my post. Look. All I said is I had the same question.. Never said anything regarding the case or even the recent posts..
September 5, 20179 yr Signed it and put the word out to some groups/pages I belong to in social media to help spread the word. I reached out to Adam Kraut (The Gun Collective, This week in guns and running for NRA Board) about this a while back, he said in reality it will be up to the court if they hear the case. I personally believe it will take a lot of noise to maybe get the courts attention and help sway them to hear it if they are on the fence. Maybe if the NRA did back it and start a campaign to support it, it could help. Keep spreading the word and banging that drum!Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
September 5, 20179 yr Author Many of you have already seen this article which was first posted on Canada Free Press. This was written by one of SAPPA's founding members. Please sign the petition which is referenced in this article. Here is where you can see TPATH's posting of it and where you can download it in PDF. http://www.tpath.org/two-enemies.html By the way, testing the shoe, usually let's one discover if it fits.
September 5, 20179 yr Good article! Thanks Rysdad. Wish we could get some of that same publicity in this country.
October 19, 20179 yr Just read the update on the sappa website requesting we write letters to the supreme court justices requesting they hear this case, I just finished my 9 letters has anyone else seen this update.
October 30, 20179 yr 1 hour ago, Mr.Stu said: Cert denied. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk So is that it? NJ gets ignored again?
October 30, 20179 yr I hate to be a Debbie Downer but did anyone really expect a different result when Cert was denied the first time? I thought this case was an interesting idea and initially worth the shot, but when Cert was initially denied that should have been the end of it. Then when I saw the history of petitions to SCOTUS something did not seem right. I applaud the initial efforts but after that it was beating a dead horse.Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
October 30, 20179 yr cert denied means what? that the sc won't hear this case? is there anyt feasible appeal possibiulity
October 30, 20179 yr 12 minutes ago, 1LtCAP said: cert denied means what? that the sc won't hear this case? is there anyt feasible appeal possibiulity Finito... start over
October 30, 20179 yr cert denied means what? that the sc won't hear this case? is there anyt feasible appeal possibiulityThat's it. Cert was denied once already. This was a Hail Mary reserved usually for stays of execution. Again Cert was denied. There are no options left.Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
October 30, 20179 yr 5 minutes ago, tattooo said: What a let down.....yet not at all surprising Ya, I’m bummed also.
October 30, 20179 yr Well..... that sux.....good work though guys. You gave it a hell of a try. Kudos to SAPPA indeed.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.