Gr935
Members-
Content Count
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
N/A
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout Gr935
-
Rank
Forum Dabbler
Profile Information
-
Home Range
Gun For Hire & Cherry Ridge
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
I think you might be misunderstanding the original question. I am not aware of any cases but have been given legal advice that it’s not in my best interest to make any upgrades to my carry pistol. I am looking for actual cases that someone can provide to better understand where this advice is coming from to weigh the pros and cons, the risks of my decision.
-
I’ve always felt a good trigger is subjective. I have a variety of pistols and I can spend more time and money learning each one which negates a “bad” trigger but I’d rather spend those two resources on my kids. That’s why I look for a trigger that fits what I already know how to shoot. The trigger I like the most isn’t necessarily the trigger I shoot the best either.
-
My understanding is a quality kydex holster will prevent UID. So if a UID is the only concern with a modified trigger do you feel a SDS with a modified trigger would be a concern? I’m trying to find some live examples where precedent has been set. The origin of this fear that we have in NJ.
-
It just sounds to me like it’s a fear from attorneys because it makes their job harder. I have yet to hear if a live actual example where an outcome was dictated due to upgraded parts. I hope someone chimes in to correct me or clarify.
-
I’m wondering if a prosecutor would treat an optic as an upgrade.
-
You are correct. I learned to shoot and have been shooting my Glock 19 for a very long time. I have other pistols with far more refined triggers but I shoot this one better just due to the time and rounds I’ve put through it. I picked up a 48 and the trigger is nothing like my 19. Hoping someone has some insight.
-
Gr935 started following Trigger upgrades
-
Has anyone else been advised that upgrading a pistol that is then used in self defense is a bad idea from a legal defense standpoint? I’ve been advised multiple times of this which doesn’t make any sense. If true, can someone please explain where it comes from?