SAPPA

Hey, Sorry, I forgot to mention that we here at the SAPPA Group are working on something very important. Many of us have worked for Trump during the primaries and therefore are on a list that allows us access to NJ State Campaign managers. We have approached them with a basic view of our plan. We were told that they are interested in it and will, after we present it to them, pass it on to the National Campaign. I can't tell you more right now but understand that this will show how far Mr. Trump is willing to go, as he says in his rallies, to "protect your Second Amendment". We shall see. Dwight

TPATH and the SAPPA Group posted an article for our readers. It is called "Over A Year and Still Standing". Thought some of you might like to see it. You can see it on www.tpath.org HERE Or you can download it in PDF format PDF HERE Also you can download or read the Circuit Court Appeal HERE Will keep you all informed right here if any news breaks. Regards, Dwight

Hi All, SAPPA Status Update Instead of writing narrative here to inform you of the latest on our Federal Lawsuit I decided to just paste in the latest update from our SAPPA Log which can be found on the SAPPA Pages of www.tpath.org Nick and I would like to note that even though we are moving through the federal court system pretty much as Nick had predicted (except for the extensive delays) as we have always said, the only place this legal action will ultimately prevail is in the Supreme Court. Right now, with the Court being 4 to 4 liberal/conservative, we do not want this case getting there until the 9th Justice is seated. Any ties in Supreme Court cases revert back to the lower court. This we cannot allow. So please, some of you on this forum do not like Trump. Understand you are not voting for the man, you are voting for his policies and the future of our gun rights. One or more liberals on the Supreme Court and hundreds of judges on the other lower Federal Courts will destroy this country for 50 years and possibly forever. Here then is the latest update from the SAPPA web pages. There is much good news in this update. Thanks to all of you, Dwight & Nick ===================== October 18, 2016- The Jurisdictional Brief was formally submitted to the Circuit Court of Appeals. There may be a panel of just three (3) judges deciding this or the entire Circuit Court group of judges may be involved. Mr.Purpura requested that it go before the entire Court, legally called en banc. We will now have to wait and see just how they will handle this. The filing can be seen HERE. October 15, 2016- Mr. Purpura received a response form Circuit Court regarding his request for page enlargement. They agreed to allow six (6) additional pages. However, since we are working on a deadline, the Brief had gone through its final editing and was complete and ready to be filed without the need for these extra pages. October 5, 2016- Having not received a response from the Circuit Court concerning our enlargement request, the filing was edited down to the 30 page limit and all of us believe this document to be complete, impressive and the information in it will be very hard to ignore. This document will, when filed, have a TitlePage, a table of contents and a list of the authorities we used in its preparation. November 3, 2016- As we struggled to get the Brief down to the 30 page limit Mr. Purpura prepared and sent a letter to the Circuit Court requesting an enlargement of the page limit because the filing would need to encompass three Defense Teams. See that letter HERE. September 20, 2016- Mr. Purpura began the research needed to prove Circuit Court Jurisdiction and working with the SAPPA Group member, Dwight Kehoe, began preparing and editing this very important new filing. This task was monumental in that the information regarding the three Defense Teams needed to be compressed into a 30 page maximum filing. It also needed to include Title Page, indexes and authorities which are required to prove Jurisdiction. September 12, 2016- The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a new Court Order in response to Mr. Purpura's filing which explained that the Circuit Court did indeed have Jurisdiction concerning the District Court's ruling. That Order, which issued a C.A. Number of 16-3173 to this case, changed its earlier Order and issued this new one which indicated that there may in fact be Jurisdiction for them. This is great news because with this new order, we can get much information to the Circuit Court that we feel they need to be aware of. We need to make it clear that this new order does not totally agree with Mr. Purpura concerning Jurisdiction but only that it has agreed to have a panel look at it. This can be considered nothing less than yet another successful maneuver by our own Pre Se, Mr. Nicholas Purpura. The Circuit Court Order can be seen HERE. August 22. 2016- It has been just over a month since the last update. That does not mean however that nothing has been happening. Much has. In fact too much to relate completely here. So please click on this link to view a posted update on TPATH. A short summary of that article: Judge Shipp has been removed from the case. Motions were filed in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. Much more. Link to the Update Article SHAKE UP IN THE FEDERAL COURT

There was a development that created the need to contact the Circuit Court of Appeals. We can't tell you more than that now. Hope you understand. But know this, there have been significant things happening and all of them good, We will be able to get more info out in a few days. Dwight

Yes, Big things are happening. Can't tell you much right now. But we will be filing a report in a few days. Hang in there. We will be posting some good news. We have these scoundrels on the run. Dwight & Nick

Hey All, Thought I would drop you a link to our latest update rather than try and post it all here. You might be surprised at this latest developments. Just so you all know, with Nick's leadership the SAPPA Group is hanging in and keeping the pressure on. We will not end our battle until the last avenue has been exhausted. If the timing is right, we may just win this thing. If Trump wins and we get a conservative Supreme Court Justice it should line up nicely with the time frame when we will be filing there. A little info some of you may know but some may not. If an appeals case goes to the Supreme Court and there is a tie there, the ruling then goes back to the lower court's decision and become law. That ladies and gentlemen, we do not want. Here is a link to the Information update posted on the SAPPA Pages of the TPATH website. http://www.tpath.org/shakeup-in-the-federal-court.html Don't forget we have all the documents generated by SAPPA, the Courts and the defense attorneys on the web site. You can read or download them HERE. ​Thanks everyone for your continued support during this long struggle. Nick and Dwight and the rest of the SAPPA Group members really do appreciate it.

Those "subliminal" messages? When I posted the article on TPATH, the whole page went into the buffer without me knowing it. That list is merely the names of articles we posted on TPATH this year. After I posted the thread here, I realized that that list pasted. I went right in and edited it out. The only reason I can think of that you saw this list you were probably there before I got it edited out. Sorry for the confusion but know that this is only a list of our articles, not some hacking conspiracy. LOL Dwight

Okay All, We haven't posted much, but we have been busy. Rather than explain it all here is the text of what we posted on the SAPPA pages today. Thanks for all the interest and help many of you have given. TPATH Posting for SAPPA July 20, 2016 ============== UPDATE AND COMMENTARY ON THE SAPPA GROUP FEDERAL LAWSUIT By Dwight Kehoe and Nicholas Purpura July 20, 2016 ~TPATH~ It has been just over a year since the Federal Civil Rights RICO action has been filed in the District Court in Trenton. Nicholas Purpura v. Chris Christie et al has been successfully hidden from the public by the despicable media and even though the state of New Jersey has gone through several sets of professional legal teams combating the various filings, motions and legal requests, Governor Christie has never mentioned this law suit in public. Why is that? First of all it is no secret that the leftist media here in New Jersey despises Governor Christie with a passion. They have managed to turn the placement of several street cones near some stupid bridge into crimes worse than the My Lai Massacre. So one would imagine that a Federal lawsuit filed against him and his legislative cohorts for civil rights violations would be dominating the print and TV media as relentlessly as that dastardly bridge closing was. Well, not quite! And here’s why. This lawsuit was filed in defense of our Second Amendment rights, one of many parts of the Constitution which liberals loathe even more than Christie. They despise and abhor anything to do with citizens having the ability to defend themselves. Anything that is that does not have to do with their own use of armed guards or personal weapons. Therefore despite this apparent opportunity this legal action presents regarding the future demise of Christie, the media have buried this deeper than a Clinton pay for play extortion scandal. To be fair, Governor Christie has done a few things which we suggested he do in the text of the Federal Brief and in several letters which we sent directly to him. But for him to now, while speaking to national audiences in support of Donald Trump and even earlier during the primaries, claim he is a staunch supporter of Second Amendment rights is not just disingenuous, but blatantly false. The legal action taken by Nicholas Purpura was designed, prepared and supported by facts and legal precedents. It identifies many, many unconstitutional laws on the books here in New Jersey as well as the collusion and conspiracy involved in the passing and enforcing of them. The lawsuit does not require or request any of the defendants be fined, removed from office or incarcerated. It only demands that these firearm laws in New Jersey be reviewed and those determined to be unconstitutional, be removed. It would also prohibit the passage of future unconstitutional legislation. It asks that any citizen who was caught up in one or more of these outrageous laws, be exonerated. This does not include criminals who were convicted of these gun laws as a result of activities in other felonies. If Christie is a supporter of the Bill of Rights, as he has claimed over and over again on the national stage, why then has he hired legal teams, using tax payer dollars, to fight off Purpura’s lawsuit? Why has he not, as the Brief suggests, just simply admit the various violations and then proceed to fix them? A move such as that would save New Jersey taxpayers money and move New Jersey closer to constitutional compliance. Instead he has chosen to fight this action and fight it stealthily. The only reasonable assessment or determination regarding his failure to acquiesce, could only be that he does not really support the Second Amendment. Which of course, he does not and is why he was included in the lawsuit to begin with. As we mentioned in the first paragraph this legal action has languished in the Federal District Court in Trenton now for over a year. An Obama installed judge, Michael Shipp has been assigned to it from the very beginning. We have shown and proven beyond any reasonable doubt that there has been illegal collusion between the Court Clerks and the state defendants. We have filed motions with the court whereby the evidence included with them required that the defendants be ruled in default. All of which have been ignored by Judge Shipp. Several weeks ago, after almost a year of delays and missed ruling dates, the Judge finally made a decision and issued a ruling. Not the one you might expect however. He did not rule on the basis of law or the Constitution because he is quite aware of the many warnings issued to him by Mr. Purpura that the day will come when he will have to explain the legal basis for his rulings. So that portion of this legal tug of war has been utterly and completely ignored. He ruled that the lawsuit Nick filed was too complicated and that it confused the professional defense attorneys. He issued a court order requiring that the entire Brief be reformed and then resubmitted to the court and the defendants. This new filing, apparently needed to be easier for the defendant’s legal team and the Court to comprehend. It wouldn’t be a bad thing either if some of those pesky and impossible to deny precedents were exorcised. Mr. Purpura was given less than 30 days to comply or Judge Shipp would dismiss the case with Prejudice. This move, he and his high priced colluders figured, would create an easy exit from this legal nightmare. The case would be removed from the docket without the need to create a court record of rulings which violate the Constitution and the Federal Rules of the Court. But hold on here, Mr. Purpura has repeatedly warned that the delays being employed by the court were not simply the standard snail paced legal system in action, but that the Judge and the defense attorneys were trying to find some way out without being held accountable later. They tried claiming several very weak motions, all of which Mr. Purpura immediately cut off at the knees. Having failed at those endeavors they appear to have buckled down and come up with this refile thing. So after a year, this is the best they could come up with? Apparently so. Too bad for them that Mr. Purpura anticipated their move before they even made it and had a response ready. Within a few days, the court and the defendants had a Motion to Rescind and Vacate the order to resubmit. This new Motion was in their hands before they had finished back slapping each other for the clever thing they had just done. It is not known by us just what reaction they had to this Motion but we are quite sure they had to wonder how it was prepared and submitted so quickly. Then, as weeks went by, while they dug deeper into the bowels of legal precedent they came up with an order to deny the Rescind and Vacate Motion and the order was accompanied by the previous threat to close the case with Prejudice. Having knowledge of the corruption and tyrannical modes and methods of the court systems in this country, Purpura had prepared too, for that move. Within hours of the judge’s ruling, Nick filed with the District Court a Notice of Appeal which will then, by law, be passed onto the Circuit Court for processing. This move on the part of Mr. Purpura, while being supported by law, is not something that the Court anticipated that a non-attorney might have knowledge of. No doubt the good judge is not a happy camper right about now. Once again he has found himself in the position of having to go on record, now with the upper court, as to what legal basis he employed to close this case. It is doubtful Judge Shipp is enjoying these beautiful summer days of July as the temperature simmering on the hot streets of Trenton are no match for mercury rising under his robed shirt collar. The filing of the Appeals Notice, which required about $500.00 in cost, is the first step required in the Appeals process. As a result of this filing the Circuit Court is required to issue a Circuit Court Docket Number and should do so within two weeks. That number will be applied to the actual Appeals Motion which will filed very shortly after the case is issued a docket number. When this process has begun, along with several other things, the defendants will have to explain the basis from which Judge Shipp decided that Mr. Purpura’s original Brief was too complicated and confusing, to the extent that it had to be revised and resubmitted. It will be interesting to see if the upper court is likewise confused. The Court documents discussed in this article, can be found on the District Court Document page in the SAPPA section of TPATH. COURT DENIES RECALL AND VACATE ​NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE CIRCUIT COURT VIEW ALL DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENTS FROM THE FIRST FILING OF THE BRIEF TO THIS NOTICE OF APPEAL RETURN TO FRONT PAGE

Hi Guys, No news yet. The court has missed the last date when they were supposed to make a ruling. We have not heard from them since Nick sent a formal request to Judge Shipp for him to recuse himself based on the fact that he might be beholden to Second Amendment hating Obama who appointed him. They may be having a little trouble responding to that. The ruling by the FBI this week is very scary. Clearly no one in power in this country cares a hoot about the rule of law if it impacts the elite. If this keeps up I'm convinced that L&L time is less than a decade away. Dwight

Fred, This subject has been dealt with in several of our motions and letters to the court. Among other points too lengthy to relate here, we have proven by statistics that every citizen in NJ is affected by the illegal NJ laws. Simply by living here. We have testimony from Police Chiefs who are on record as saying, don't bother to try, you are not getting a carry permit. And also, there are Supreme Court rulings that held anyone can file a civil rights lawsuit even if not personally affected. But remember, if you live in NJ, you know you are affected and the courts know it too. Ask your lawyer friends to take some time and read our submittals. I would like to know their responses. They can all be seen here: http://www.tpath.org/sappa-district-court-documents.html Thanks, Dwight

Hey DD, Yes, all the documents are up on the SAPPA web pages. See them here. CLICK Dwight

Hey Guys, A few things have happened since our last update. After we filed the "Recall and Vacate" motion the defense apparently felt they had no way of arguing against it so they did what they have done from the beginning. They ignored the points we made and wrote their own letter to the Judge asking that he too ignore the law. That of course forced Nick to prepare an answer to that letter. Here is an excerpt from our SAPPA webpage update. Included there are the two documents referenced here. If the links don't work in this notice both of the documents can be seen and downloaded from the SAPPA District Court Documents page. A link can be found in the blue menu box at the top of the TPATH Front Page. www.tpath.org June 6, 2016- On June 1, 2016 Mr. Purpura received a letter which was sent to the Court by the Defense Counsel whereby they presented a weak and infirm request to not produce a Motion in response to Nick's Vacate and Recall submittal. Here is their letter: DEFENSE REQUEST TO NOT RESPOND ​Mr. Purpura, having seen this type of action before, had anticipated this move by the defense and had a response template ready. All it needed was to plug in the specific charges and then be sent to the court. Here is Nick's response: REPLY TO DEFENSE LETTER OF OPPOSITION Thanks all, Dwight

Hi, Yes! We will be posting the Judge's letter, later today, on the SAPPA page which has all the District Court Documents. When it is posted you will be able to read or download it here>>> DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENTS Dwight

Hey All, A bit more action has taken place. Here is an excerpt from the SAPPA Log page. ---- May 17, 2016 - Last week Nick received a letter from Judge Shipp. Whether or not he wrote it or one of his aides is not important. The letter denied Mr. Purpura his right to present information concerning the rulings of the Court and the illegal filings of the Defense. This was the first time that the Judge actually responded to the many requests for oral arguments. However, he gave no reason for that denial and therefore we feel he has no legal grounds for it. Hence, he chose to not offer anything that Mr. Purpura could upend. It now has become ever so evident that this Judge has no intention of ruling against the leftist ideology of his Appointer and Chief - Barack Obama. Nick has known for some time that this day would come. It has now arrived. The first step to getting Judge Shipp either removed from the case or to voluntarily recuse himself is to send an informal notification of this intent. That notification has been delivered to Judge Shipp. You can read or download that letter here. Informal Request for Recusal. ----- We are now preparing the formal request for recusal that will be presented to the Chief Judge of the District Court. That document will detail the many failings and questionable activity of the Court. Thanks, Dwight I guess most of you have seen the Circuit Court Ruling in DC that puts a temporary ban on the practice of having to "shoe a special need" to carry a weapon. That DC law is pretty much a carbon copy of the one here in NJ. DK

Hi All, Several people has asked through emails and this forum how they can help the SAPPA Group get through these next stages of our lawsuit. Here is a link to the PAY PAL button on the SAPPA page. Anything you give will surely help. HERE If you are not comfortable with PAY PAL you can send a check or money order directly to Nick. Here is his address. If you send a check please put SAPPA in the FOR: line Also, just so you know, any donations to the SAPPA Group will not be tax deductible. Nicholas E. Purpura 1802 Rue De La Port Wall, New Jersey 08724 There are other ways we will need help that will be coming up very soon. Once the Brief is illegally dismissed we will begin preparing for the Third Circuit Court of Appeal. This will take up much of our resources as 40 or more bound copies of the documents on record will need to be prepared and delivered to the appropriate addresses. We will be making a list of those whom need to be served and then ask that some of the supporters of this endeavor volunteer to deliver some of them. When the time comes we will put out a detailed paper on how this needs to be done. Also and even more important, as this moves to the Circuit Court, it will be time to get as much publicity as is possible. We will then be looking for volunteers to call radio stations such as 101.5 and Hannity in an effort to get them interested. The underhanded tactics by the District Court and the Defense should make great talking fodder. So, any of you know people who have spoken to these hosts or have done so yourself, please contact us at [email protected] And we have plans to pay for ads on local cable shows and radio programs. This too will take some considerable financing. Nick and I feel this will be a very important step in this process as these judges will understand that whatever they will see the light of day. Nick and I will be creating a very short scenario that can be used by callers when they get the screeners on the phone. How quickly and interestingly this is proposed to them will be critical to getting our callers on the air. Thanks everyone. We are in the process of preparing another nice surprise for the District Court. They will see this within a day of the upcoming dismissal. Regards, Dwight and Nick

Follow up on the last update: ​May 5, 2016- As we mentioned below in the previous update, the speed and intricate attention to detail in which we prepared and filed the Recall and Vacate motion seems to have taken both Court and the defense by surprise. We also noted that it was very possible that the Court would not actually make the May 16th date. Looks like that will be the case. Nick just received a notice from the court that the defense has filed a formal request for an extension of time. The SAPPA Group has a very good reason not to object to their request. We will make that reason known to the public at a later date. Here is the letter we sent to the court regarding our non-objection. Once again we have chosen to provide an undercurrent of sarcasm wrapped in a subtle warning. Our purpose in that is to let them know that Nick is not intimidated by them nor will he allow them to presume they will be allowed to get away with illegal activity. See our letter here>>> RESPONSE TO TIME EXTENSION On another note; Our next steps will require a massive printing and binding of appeal documents. Nick reported this to the CJRPC last night. The members voted unanimously to donate a good portion of the cost for the appeal. Both Nick and I want to extend our warmest regards and thanks to the President John Scott and the membership.

No, not being sarcastic. Well, maybe a little. Here is why. If this case goes to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and they rule against us, as we are certain they will, and it then goes to the Supreme Court which now sits with an even number of Justices and they fail to come to a majority decision, the ruling of the lower court will stand. Our only hope to win this case on merit and law is to have a conservative Supreme Court balance 4 to 5. So if we can not interfere with a few delays between now and the appointment of the 9th Justice, that will probably be a good thing. Hope this helps explain our position on that. Regards, Dwight

Hey All, Another small event occurred today. The Court sent Nick a copy of a request sent to it from the Defense. Seems our Recall and Vacate filing has bunched up their drawers a touch. They have requested that Judge Shipp give them an extension of time to prepare a response. Looks like they learned their lesson a bit since the earlier times when they forgot to request an extension. That omission put them in default for which Nick will not let them slip out of. After some fact crunching Nick and I decide not to contest that request and we will produce a letter agreeing to it. We intend to include in that letter several thoughts we have on the fact that even an extension of 100 years will not provide them with a legal out. So go ahead and take all the time you want. Every delay will bring this case closer to the Supreme Court with a new Justice appointed by the next President. Which will not be a Democrat. We will post that letter here and on TPATH when we get it finalized and sent out. Regards, Dwight and Nick Tonight, Indiana gave America a good jump towards a great future.

Hey All, A few things have taken place since our last update post. Here is an excerpted from the SAPPA Log. Regards, Dwight ----------------- April 25, 2016- We received a particularly quick response from the Court today concerning our filing of the Recall and Vacate motion which was produced as a result of the Order and Memorandum issued last week. See below for those documents. The Court announced that it intends to make a ruling on Nick's Recall request on May 16, 2016. We gave the Court and the Defense quite a bit to ponder in the Recall, so we won't be too surprised if that date slips by without a ruling. See the Court's notification HERE. Since the Court once again ignored the request for a conference or oral arguments, we prepared a follow up letter to Judge Shipp. Nick felt it was time to let them know our plans for the future. Those plans are explained in the letter. The letter was sent to the court on April 29, 2016. We hope it gives a few people something to ponder over the weekend. See that letter HERE.

Hey All, We finished the reply to the Court's Order and Memorandum and served the Court Friday afternoon. The amount of work required to get this done in time put a strain on both Nick and I. But we were determined to not let them off the hook on a fabricated technicality. Here is a pasting from the SAPPA News and Update Log. You will be able to download or read all the latest documents which includes our Cover Letter to the Recall and Vacate request, the order and memorandum issued by the Court. There is much to read in our filing, but keep in mind the hours and days it took us to research and prepare this filing We will keep you posted on any resulting developments. Dwight and Nick ___________________ .​April 23, 2016 - Mr. Purpura and I have been working on a response to the Court's Order and Memorandum pretty much non-stop since the day we received it just over two weeks ago. As we mentioned in the last update, the court has taken almost 4 months to prepare its Dismissal and Memorandum and then gave Mr. Purpura less than 3 weeks to resubmit his entire Brief or the case would be closed "with prejudice". Something in that seems just a bit lopsided, but nothing that Nick had not anticipated. Even though he had not anticipated that the Court would demand the entire Brief be resubmitted, Nick had been able to do some research in preparation of what the Court would try. So even though the format for our reply changed as a result of that cowardly Order and Memorandum, we had done enough work to promptly begin our response. Why did I call this Court action cowardly? Well, because that is exactly what it was. Here is why. As we have been saying since the inception of this law suit, it could not lose based upon Federalism, the Constitution or Supreme Court precedents. The only way this Court could save the Defendants, which of course has been its sole enterprise from the moment it had been filed, was to find some way to close this case without having to rule on the merits. Which of course they could never be done. As we have chronicled early on, several dirty tricks were pulled by both the Court and the Defendants. All of which, by the way, Mr. Purpura stopped in their proverbial tracks. This latest effort to not rule on the law, thereby providing cover for his legacy, Judge Shipp decided to issue an Order that he knew could never be complied with in time. Again, the Court underestimated Mr. Purpura. However, Nick decided not to comply with the Order and Memorandum, since it was quite clear why it had been issued. Which had nothing to do with what Judge Shipp referenced in his Order but everything to do with avoiding the need to make a ruling based upon law. A ruling that would surely follow him and his legacy beyond his working years. So instead Nick issued, as was his legal right, a Recall and Vacate submittal. A demand that the Court Recall and Vacate the poorly supported and legally unsound Order. Along with the Recall and Vacatedemand we prepared a cover letter, which while not quite being an olive branch, it does offer the Judge a way out. Both the Cover Letter and the Recall and Vacate submission can be seen or downloaded here. COVER LETTER and RECALL AND VACATE DOCUMENT Both of these documents, much to what we suspect will be a not so wonderful surprise to either the Court or the Defendants, have been served on the Court in Trenton on April 22, 2016. The Cover Letter and the Recall and Vacate filing, once read, will fully illuminate the underhandedness and deceitful intentions behind the Court Order and Memorandum. It will take some time to read it, but not nearly as much time as both Nick and myself spent researching and preparing it. While it’s very likely that the Court will deny Nick’s Recall and Vacate filing and it is just as likely that Judge Shipp will, without further warning, issue what he hopes will be the end of this legacy killing affair and dismiss this case “with prejudice”. If he tries that, once again Mr. Purpura has a little surprise in store. Stay tuned my friends.

Hey All, We have been seriously busy preparing our response to Judge Shipp's order to resubmit the entire Brief. Will be posting an update very soon. Dwight

Hey All- As promised- An update prepared for this Forum. OUTRAGEOUS RULING BY OBAMA’S JUDGE April 6, 2016 ~TPATH~ On March 31, 2016, after months and months of delay, after missing numerous ruling dates, and what appears to be collusion between the defense and the District Court Judge Shipp, an Obama appointee, finally issued his ruling on several motions related to Purpura v. Christie, a Federal law suit which was filed early last year. It detailed proof of collaboration and conspiracy by New Jersey state officials, political, judicial and law enforcement to deny New Jersey citizens their Constitutional rights under the Second Amendment. The Brief showed conclusively that this conspiracy was a Civil Rights violation of the Federal RICO Statutes. Much to our shock, (just kidding, no surprise at all) Obama’s Judge showed total disregard for the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and ruled in favor of the Defendants, granting their procedurally infirm Motion(s) to Dismiss. This ruling was issued despite the fact that the Defense wholly failed to file an affirmative defense or a timely response as required and mandated by law. If America were still a land of laws, those two violations of the regulations would have created an automatic declaration of default. Judge Shipp, an ideologue placed on the Court by the leftwing Obama, in total disregard for established law and rules of procedure which have been consistently and routinely supported by Supreme Court precedent, ignored those rules and denied Mr. Purpura’s Motion for Default and Summary Judgment. His ruling not only despoils the Federal Court’s regulations but also violates existing RICO statutes which have been defined in the Petition. In a veiled and disgraceful attempt to further protract this litigation, Judge Shipp, using underhanded procedural tactics, not only denied Purpura's Motions “without prejudice”, which would normally have allowed Mr. Purpura to appeal his Order and the supporting Memorandum Opinion, added a caveat to the Order. Mr. Purpura was given until April 29th to amend the Complaint. If he fails to do so, the Complaint shall be dismissed, this time “with prejudice”. Thereby making it almost impossible to appeal this case to the Third Circuit Court! This caveat, as if there were not already substantial evidence that this Judge is working hand-in-hand with the Defendants as opposed to being an impartial jurist, is quite clearly designed in support of those Defendants and their history of Civil Rights violations. Let it be known, "No Fair and Impartial” hearing ever took place. Let it also be known that Mr. Purpura will submit an Amended Complaint within the time frame ordered by the Court. This filing will prove that the District Court in the State of New Jersey has and continues to act in connivance with the Defendants. Mr. Purpura will further prove that "Due Process" was blatantly denied! One example is/was the District Court's repeated refusal to allow an oral argument or even a conference. These denials were issued so as to preclude the possibility of any written record which could and would have been used against them in an appeals process. Mr. Purpura’s Amended Complaint will show that this tactic has been repeatedly used by the District Court (Trenton). These collaborators may have avoided making potentially embarrassing and harmful statements during oral arguments but they will not escape much longer as the Amended Complaint Mr. Purpura files will become part of the Official Record. Nevertheless, ignoring numerous rules, statutes, and Supreme Court precedence, as well as the United States Constitution, Obama’s Judge ruled in favor of the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Why would this sociopolitical jurist, Judge Shipp, misinterpret, manipulate and ignore his duty to uphold the Constitution? Quite simple. He is reasonably confident he can get away with it. One case in point in his ruling, which appears to be the main thrust of his Dismissal Order, declares Mr. Purpura had no standing because he was not actually denied a carry permit. This arrogance ignores the fact that everyone not connected to law enforcement or some form of security work in New Jersey who applies, is summarily denied. Even retired police officers. Mr. Purpura was told on several occasions not to bother to apply, since he would be wasting his time and money, as have by the way, thousands of other NJ citizens. While there may not be an official record personally for Mr. Purpura, there are many, many recorded videos of Police Chiefs telling citizens the same thing. NJ2AS has a video of a Police official from a rather upscale town in Northern New Jersey telling an applicant that not one person in his entire town during the 20 plus years he has been there, has been issued a carry permit. Simply put, as surely as gravity would plunge Mr. Purpura to the ground if his parachute failed to open, his application for a carry permit would be denied. He knows it, the Court knows it. As does every citizen in the state of Liberty and Prosperity. So as surely as the earth orbits the sun, Mr. Purpura and every NJ citizen has standing in this case. If there is any good news in this outrageous and legally unsupportable ruling is that the case was dismissed “without prejudice”. This will require Mr. Purpura to file a motion of appeal back to the Obama appointed judge’s District Court. It becomes legally complicated at this point because the motion will once again be reviewed by the same Obama appointed judge and no doubt there will be more collusion between the defense and the Federal Court as they once again ponder ways to ignore the law in regards to the points Mr. Purpura will make in his Amended Complaint as well as on appeal up to and including the Supreme Court of these United States! TPATH will continue to post updates as well as post every document submitted to the District Court of New Jersey – It's time to expose these low-life reprobates! Prepared by: Dwight Kehoe and Nicholas Purpura For the njgunforum.com NOTE: Mr. Purpura will be holding a lecture and a Q&A forum very soon. We will post the details when they become final.

BREAKING NEWS! The Court ruled on March 31, 2015. They denied all of Nick's motions and agreed with the state to dismiss the case. What a shock! Just kidding we expected that. The ruling allows for an appeal which we were told has to be in to Trenton by April 29th. They took 6 months and now we have just over 3 weeks to answer the reasons the Judge stated for his dismissal. Nick and I are already at work on them and will have our response ready in plenty of time. Nick wants everyone to know that all of the reasons for dismissal are weak and easily contested. We expect that they know that. Hence the length of time they took preparing the dismissal. Nick has scheduled a date for a dissertation on what has happened and what our plans are going forward. AT that event he will also take any questions or suggestions from the audience. Everyone in this forum is invited. I'll be filing a full report along with the date, time and place of the Speaking event tomorrow. By the way, there will be no charge to attend. Until tomorrow, Dwight

Hey All, Here is an excerpt from the SAPPA Update log. SUNDAY, MARCH 20, 2016 - We sent a letter to Judge Shipp dated March 14, 2016 and we can now report that and post it as we have confirmation that it was received by the District Court. As with every letter we have sent in the past, we have no way of knowing if or when Judge Shipp will be given this letter. The letter demands information and action on this case. The letter can be seen here: DEMAND FOR A DECISION A note on the upcoming appeal. We call this the upcoming appeal because we are certain, as we have from the very onset that the District Court will not rule in favor of the Constitution but will side with leftist ideology and therefore an appeal is a foregone conclusion. The fact that this court has delayed for almost a year now just might be a gift. If this case had been dismissed we would have to file an appeal within a short specified period. That would give the appeals court final say as the US Supreme Court would be deadlocked at 4 to 4 in the absence of the 9th justice. So if this case is not ruled on for several more months, by the time we get it to the US Supreme Court, if the Republican Party does not blow this election, will have new conservative Justice seated. The complete log can be read here>>>> http://www.tpath.org/sappa-news-and-reports.html Isn't great to see the efficiency of our beloved judicial system? Regards, Dwight

Watch this video http://rsbn.tv/live-stream-donald-trump-jr-rally-in-elko-nv-2-22-16/ Stick with it until he gets to guns. Around 20 minute mark.