SAPPA

Hi All,, The leadership of SAPPA discussed in detail and at great length as to what time would be most appropriate and the most effective to announce our request for an investigation. It was unanimous that after having given the Judge a few days to read the information we sent him, that his next motivation might come from a question or two from the press on the subject. No one really knows how the Judge will react, but what we know is it is imperative that we keep the pressure on, in any form we can muster. Hopefully you all have read the letter we sent to Judge Simandle and saw that we treated him with respect as we did Judge Shipp. We are not looking to create enemies or bad feelings but we need for them to know we are serious and that we do not intend to sit around for years waiting for them to do the the job they were hired to do and to defend the Constitution consistent with the oath they took. Thanks for the responses to today's post. We really do appreciate all your thoughts and comments. I'll keep you posted on anything we hear from the Chief Judge. By the way, he was appointed by Bush. When you compare him to Obama appointees that can't be bad, provided you forget that it was Bush who appointed Roberts. LOL Regards, Dwight

Hi All, Here it is. As promised. The latest effort the SAPPA Group is working on to get this case moving. Dwight and Nick I'll post the update here in its entirety. If any of the links do not work just click on this link to go straight to the article. http://www.tpath.org/taking-a-new-turn.html Also you might enjoy a new article we posted for one of TPATH's Contributors RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT http://www.tpath.org/it-s-reckless-endangerment.html A SAPPA Group Filed by Dwight Kehoe Update & Report November 19, 2015 ~TPATH~ Trenton, NJ- Over the past several months a quiet battle has been raging. The leftist power machine, compromised of both State and Federal ideologues, has had its hands full and its wits tested as it deployed dirty trick after dirty trick in its battle to eradicate the lawsuit known as Purpura v. Christie, et al. After each announcement of an intended ruling, Mr. Purpura filed an additional document to be added to the Official Court Record. The documents laid out many previous Federal Court rulings and precedents which would be used in the intended appeal of any unconstitutional or illegal ruling. As a result, each of these ruling dates have come and gone, without the scheduled decision. The SAPPA Group is now ready to reveal the next step in this battle for our Bill of Rights. Since the Court has refused to answer any questions, nor have they addressed any of the positions Nick made in those documents, nor have they made any rulings, we can only presume they have no idea what to do next. That my friends, is a good thing. Mr. Purpura, on the other hand, finds himself in no such position. We are now ready to reveal publically what we have been doing to move this case from the obscure shadows of delay and avoidance and bring it further into the light of scrutiny. There is a little known rule which requires any sitting judge to open an investigation into activities which are unethical or inconsistent with the rules of the court. This applies especially to the Chief Judge of any Federal Court, whether it be the District, the Circuit or the Supreme Court. We have proof, residing in more than circumstantial, of several unethical and procedurally infirm events having taken place in regards to the Purpura v. Christie, et al, Federal lawsuit. Mr. Purpura prepared a formal request to the Chief Judge of the District Courtin which he laid out, in clear and chronological terms, the unsavory and possibly illegal activity of the Federal District Court in Trenton. In that package he included several letters and other documentation detailing the goings on. As of this date, that package has been delivered by special USPO Priority mail and we have a notice that the office of the Chief Judge has received it. That letter can be viewed and downloaded here: Letter to Chief Judge Simandle. Once we received the confirmation that Judge Simandle’s office had the letter and the package in its possession and that sufficient time had passed for the Judge to review the documentation the SAPPA Group, in cooperation with TPATH, issued a Press Release informing the media of this action. The Press Release was sent to over 20 Newspapers here in New Jersey. We did get confirmation from a few of them acknowledging the receipt of the Press Release. As of this writing it is not known if any of them intend to cover this story. Read and download that Press Release. Also as of this time we do not know the status of the requested investigation that Chief Judge Simandle is required to perform. When we find out, so will our readers. ​CONTACT SAPPA A NOTE FROM TPATH: It’s important to address several queries we have gotten from a few supporters. The concern is that this lawsuit may have more trouble than it might have had in the light of the recent mass shootings both here and abroad and that those events might bolster the left’s demagoguery concerning the fear of firearms. Actually, those atrocities are having exactly the opposite effect. Events such as those, when they occur and people are ruthlessly and methodically slaughtered as a result of laws which have kept them defenseless, the more right thinking people begin to understand if they are to survive an incident like that, having armed “good guys” is the only sane answer. One needs to know and to never forget, there are two groups of people who make up the “gun control” advocacy group. The “Brainwashers” and the “Brainwashed”. The Brainwashers are the leftist government people who need an unarmed population in order to dictate and rule without fear. The Brainwashed are those who are used by them to do the dirty work of joining the chorus demanding the disarming of law abiding citizens, even as these used fools fail to realize it is they themselves who are as likely to become victims of that ideology. Why do they help those who would keep them defenseless? Well, because they are naïve and a little stupid which makes them perfect candidates for “Brainwashing”. It's well known, you can't fix stupid, but you surely can take advantage of it. CONTACT TPATH

Hey All, As I reported last week Nick decided it was time to take this to the next level. We had decided not to let what we have been doing, in that respect, out in the open until we got some firm idea of the response it would get. Nick has approved the public release of what we have done. We will posting that information late this afternoon. Also I'll post all of it on the SAPPA Web pages, here. Thanks everyone, I'll be back with the latest after Nick and the other leadership approve of the post I'm preparing. Regards, Dwight www.tpath.org

Hi Everyone, The answer to the question as to if it would help for individual members of the NRA or any Second Amendment organization, is YES! As some of you know Nick and I are members of the CJR&P (Nick for many years more than I). Nick is a regular speaker at the monthly meetings and provides an update to the members. President John Scott did all he could do relating to the NRA by writing a personal letter to them. They did respond but refused to get involved. They handed John some legal BS about getting involved with a Pro Se (Non attorney) But NIck and I think it goes much deeper than that. When SAPPA contacted them close to a year ago, they didn't even give us the courtesy of a response. Keep in mind both John's letter and ours did not ask for money. In fact we stated clearly the SAPPA Group only wanted the NRA to help get this lawsuit some publicity. What Nick thinks, and I agree, the NRA has a fabulous cash cow with dollars flowing in everyday. It might be that if this Purpura v. Christie et al lawsuit is successful the Federal Ruling which would cover not just NJ, but every state in the Union, some of that cash might just dry up. When the SAPPA Group gives presentations to groups, we generally cover this topic by equating it to what would happen if a scientist notified the press on a Friday evening that on the following Monday he would announce a complete cure for every known type of cancer. This fine scientist would not live to see Saturday morning. But having said that, any contact by members of any club or organization would help. The SAPPA Group has already sent over 20 letters to NJ and National gun Clubs. We have received modest support from a few in terms of "atta boys, go get em". But that's about it. NJ2AS did put a notice of our suit in one of their Bulletins. The SAPPA Group will travel anywhere to give a presentation to organizations or groups. (We have been doing this for over a year now) So if anyone belongs to a group that might be interested, let us know. We never charge a fee. We only require that we be allowed to start our presentation prior to all other club agenda. We have found that if members have to sit through an hour or more of club business most of them, by the time our presentation starts, are looking for the door instead asking questions. Our presentation takes about 20 minutes and depending on how interested the group is the Q&A could go longer. Thanks again, Dwight and Nick

Thanks Everyone, If the ad thing goes off, we'll let you know where to send contributions. So hold off until we get it worked out. Thanks, Dwight n Nick

Hey All, Nick and I took a major step yesterday concerning the ongoing delays and possible collusion between the Defense Counsel and the Court Clerk. I can't tell you what it is just yet because it needs to fly under the radar until the ball gets rolling on what we have done. In several days I will announce it and will post the documents associated with it. A little hint: Federal Courts operate under a code that, if crossed, steps MUST be taken. And, as you can imagine, the search for some way for the court to dismiss this case is still ongoing. This delay is actually and probably good news and Nick tells me that their search will most likely be fruitless. That is not to say that they will not come up with something, both weak and far fetched. When and if that does occur the SAPPA Group will move into the next step of our long term plan. We have been convinced now that the local or national news media will continue to ignore this case and that is of course what the defense needs and desires. To combat this it will be our intention to buy ads on local stations and even newspapers describing what the SAPPA Group is doing. This will have some fairly heavy costs but it may be the one way we can get this ball rolling in the media. We have not solicited financial help so far but that might change if we do decide to run some ads. We are not asking for donations as of now. Heck we may even win this case on the grounds that the defense violated federal rules. That would allow the Judge to move on and give this headache to some other jurist. That would be the 3rd Circuit. Okay all, that's the latest. Stay tuned for the update concerning our latest effort. Any day now we will be able to describe it. Thanks again for all the moral support this forum has give us. Nick and I could never be able to thank you enough. Regards, Dwight

Hi All, As promised here is the latest on the Brief. Dwight WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2015 - Since our last update Nick has called the Court on several occasions requesting the status of the ruling on the three Motions before the Court. Also, during those calls he asked for confirmation on the Letters Of Record which were recently sent to Judge Shipp. The court clerk claimed they did not get the latest one Oral Argument Letter of October 29,2015. This is peculiar because this letter was sent to them US POstal Service High Priority. That letter is just one of many we have sent to the Judge. As of this date not one of them has been answered. ​As a result it was decided to write yet another letter to Judge Shipp with two objectives. One is to ask him why he has not responded or requested that the Court Clerk respond to Nick's letters. The second purpose is to provide US Supreme Court statements and rulings concerning the pro se filings in the Federal Court System. As you know, it is our belief that the delay in rulings may be because either the Court or the Defendants (or both in cahoots- which would be a violation of law) are searching for some technicality that would give the Defendants an out without having to provide a defense for their unconstitutional actions. See that letter here >> Letter to Shipp - November (2) Since the Court Clerk seems to have a difficult time getting to the US Mail INBOX, on this day Wednesday, November 4, 2015 Mr. Purpura made yet another trip to Trenton. He hand delivered the October letter and this latest one Letter to Shipp-November. He got a date and time stamp for each from the Court Clerk. Nick has decided that the things going on at that office are pushing the envelope of legality and he is considering requesting an investigation into their activities. We will keep this log advised as to the nature and procedure of that endeavor.

Hey, Here is our last update. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2015 - It has been awhile since our last update because there has not been anything new to report. There still has been no response from the Court on the several letters which were sent requesting that the 3 Motions before the Court not be ruled on without oral arguments. As we stated in several postings it is Nick's belief that there is a mad scramble to find some way to dismiss this case without having to rule on the Constitutional issues. The simple fact that several dates have passed which were supposed to be "ruling dates" may indicate that they are finding the easy way out, not so easy to find. Nick decided to keep the pressure on the Court and to increase the number "documents of record" concerning the right for oral arguments, we prepared and sent via special delivery another letter. Please click here to read or download today's letter. Oral Argument Letter of October 29, 2015 Also, the SAPPA Group in cooperation with TPATH put together a short 21 minute video explaining some of the things that have occurred to date. You might find it interesting. See it here on YouTube. "In Defense of the Bill of Rights" Check out the Document Page if these two links do not work. http://www.tpath.org/sappa-district-court-documents.html The only thing we really do know is if they thought they had an easy dismissal, they would have done it long ago. We have warned them that they would be held to task for any decision they make. Nick says they have a team of researchers looking for an out. Since they have not ruled yet, they must be having a bit of difficulty in that endeavor. Thanks everyone, Dwight

Revenger, I sent this info onto Nick. Thanks. Dwight

Still Nothing from the Court. The SAPP Group and TPATH just posted an information video presentation on the origin and status of the lawsuit. See it on Utube https://youtu.be/WVfG-xLnv6U Thanks Dwight

Hi All, To make it easier for many on this topic to find out the latest news without having to go to the SAPPA web pages I have decided to start posting passages form the SAPPA log. SOme of them will have links to documents you might want to read or download. Here is the latest Log entry: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2015- After not hearing anything as a result of the several letters we wrote to the Judge requesting an oral argument, relating to several times now delayed ruling, Nick once again called the Court Clerk requesting the status of the letter and the Judge's response to it. Nick was told that the letter had just "yesterday" been posted in the digital Court Record. That would be Wednesday, October 15th. Understanding that this letter was sent, registered and priority mail on October 5th, Nick asked why it was just now being included in the Court Record. The Clerk's response to this is quite interesting. Nick was told that the letter has been in "Chambers" and was just returned to the Clerk's office with orders to post it into the system. "Chambers" of course means, the Judge and his Clerk. Nick feels and I agree with him, that concern is growing within those Chambers as they realize that denying a citizen to present oral arguments in a Civil Rights case may have dire consequences for the future careers. And finally, Nick said that the demeanor of those he has spoken with seems to be changing. While they were never rude in the past, they were curt and cold. Nick said he sensed a very nice warming of relationships as those he has spoken to these past few days have been, almost friendly. It seems Nick and his lawsuit have gone from being considered an unpleasant irritant to someone and something that requires not just profound consideration but respect as well. We shall see how long this continues. So, as of this date, there has been no ruling on any of the filings for dismissal or default. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2015- ​As a followup to the registered letter Nick sent to Judge Shipp on Monday of this week, he called the Court and asked if the Judge had received the letter and that it had been made "Part of the Court Record" as requested. The Clerk claimed to know nothing of the letter. The Clerk then, after being asked, told Nick that there was no indication from the Court Chambers that the ruling would be made on the October 8, 2015. This may appear to be a delay and part of what the system usually does, but in this case we think these delays are the result of concerns understanding that any ruling will be scrutinized by another court and possibly the people. We don't know this for sure, but it seems likely. ​ ​​TUESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2015- As a result of many people inquiring about the documents which have been submitted by the various Defense Counsels we have today, scanned all of them into SAPPA Directory and then uploaded them all for downloading or reading. You can see these documents as well as the documents sent by the District Court on the District Court Document Download Page ​ MONDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2015 - On this day we finished preparing another letter to Judge Shipp, requesting, once again that Nick be given his right to present an oral argument at the time of the Judges' rulings now scheduled for October 8, 2015 which will encompass the several Motions before the Court. In this letter Nick references the Supremacy Clause. This letter was then brought down to the US Post Office and sent registered priority mail. Here is a copy of that letter >>>> REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT- SUPREMACY CLAUSE Thanks again for all the support this Forum has given to this effort. Dwight and Nick

Hey All, I just finished a meeting with Nick late yesterday. I'll be posting some information on TPATH later today. There is no earth shattering news, but it is a bit interesting. I'll be back later with a link to the update. Dwight

Hi, Turncoat asked if we were worried about the bad guys reading this forum. The answer is no. What we are doing is to the letter of the law and we have nothing to hide. Also they have no legal way to respond to the lawsuit. The only way they can weasel out of this is by technicality. The delay, which continues up to this moment, is not due to them "blowing" us off. This is a legally filed Federal lawsuit. It MUST be either answered or dismissed on a technicality. It is our guess that the delay is the result of an ongoing effort to find something that will allow them to do that. Thanks All, Dwight

No news yet. Nick and I spoke today about his call to the Court tomorrow. He intends to speak with as many clerks as he can in an effort to let them know that thousands of people are waiting for the decision from the Judge about granting an oral argument. I'll post anything he culls from that conversation. In the mean time you might enjoy my latest articles relating to gun control. One is a parable the other is laced with facts the gun control progressives pretty much hope no one notices. http://www.tpath.org/liberals-and-gun-control.html http://www.tpath.org/rattlesnake-pass.html That's all for tonight. I'll keep you all posted. By the way, if anyone in this Forum would like to be notified when we put up a new article or post you can sign up here. http://www.tpath.org/sign-up-page.html Good Night Dwight

Hi, Yes, created their own inhouse court order with official court logo and all. Included it in their package requesting dismissal. Some bit of arrogance wouldn't you say? The good sign here is that the Judge apparently did not sign it and in fact delayed his first scheduled ruling date. Dwight

Hi, A question was asked by LtCap about whether the judge or the court can delay or alter schedules without notifying the Petitioner. The answer, unfortunately is they can and do anything they want. If we had not been as vigilant as we were they would have closed this case 3 weeks after it was filed. If that had happened we would have had very little grounds for an appeal. Since they failed in that effort now they must make a ruling and the ultimate dismissal on law or untimely documentation. Now an appeal based upon the misapplication of procedure and Federal law will provide a strong basis for appeal to the Circuit Court. This, both Nick and I believe has got the court and the judge a bit nervous and is most likely the impetus for these last few delays. So actually, Nick thinks that these delays are a good thing. That they are working real hard to find some way to dismiss this case without giving us ammo (ammo, love that word) in the appeals process. I hope that answers your question. And I take no umbridge with any questions anyone may have. Now, I told everyone that I would work to get all the Court documents and the Defense documents scanned in, dated and uploaded to the SAPPA web pages. That has been done. If anyone wants to read the crapolla these lawyers are trying to use to evade answering the question as to if their clients have infringed on the Constitution, have at it. ONe very clever trick they pulled was to send an electronic filing to the Court, knowing the court would take their time getting that info to Nick, then 8 days later they mailed it to NIck. This was done to prevent us from an effective response due to lack of time. But Nick already had his response ready and to their shock, he responded in time with a Motion that must have had them scratching their collective pin heads. i Then this lawyer , swore in a legal document to the Judge that he sent this filing via the electronic method and by typical word jockeying made it sound like he mailed it to Nick the same day even though he did not ( sent it 8 days later). So technically this clown may not have perjured himself, but he clearly put forth an effort to deceive the Judge. If we get oral arguments, that will be one of many topics we bring up. HERE IS THE LINK TO ALL THE DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENTS http://www.tpath.org/sappa-district-court-documents.html Before I finish I want everyone to know that from the beginning we have said we expect this case to be dismissed. Our goal was to have it dismissed in a manner that will give us a strong appeal. Remember, our ultimate goal is the US Supreme Court, It looks like we may have done more than that. This court is certainly concerned, hence these ruling delays. We can only keep our fingers crossed at this point. Thanks again for all the support this forum has given us. You are a great bunch of guys and gals. Regards, Dwight and Nick

Okay Guys, The Judge has apparently gotten cold feet. Not sure about this, but we got word he has not ruled yet. By the way, we just sent another registered letter today requesting yet again, an oral argument. The word we got, unofficial is that the new date for the ruling is now the 8th. No one told us why the change. We are hoping it's because this Judge now knows this case is moving on to the Circuit Court and then to the US Supreme Court. They may have expected to dismiss this case and that we would just go away. They know now, that's not going to happen. He may not want to be on the side of a ruling which could stay with him his entire career, if that ruling is not based upon law. Which would be the case if he ruled against us. Just so you guys know, the last letter we sent to Judge Shipp not so very subtly suggested that it will be our intention to either subpoena and/ or request an affidavit from the Court explaining the legality of his ruling. He just may be concerned about that. We will see. I will be posting( the latest letter) on the SAPPA web pages tomorrow when I post the updates. Also, many more people are asking to see the Defenses' Motions and letters. That is enough to convince me its worth the trouble to upload them. I will do that tomorrow too. When I get it done, I'll drop off a message here. I have a golf match in the AM. I'll get to work on these uploads when I return. By the way, we will be giving an update presentation at the Wed meeting of NJR&PC . If any of you are members you might want to come hear and see what Nick has prepared. Thanks All, Dwight www.tpath.org

Question was asked- "Is there any place we can go to read the documents submitted by opposing counsel?" Nick and I were just discussing that and wondered if enough people wanted to see them to warrant the work required to scan them in and post them on the web site. If I get a few more requests we will take the time to do that. That's a promise. I'll discuss this again with Nick and see if he thinks it's okay to email them to people who request. ​Thanks for this question DirtyDigz. Send me your email address if you want to have those documents emailed to you. Send your request to [email protected] THanks, Dwight

Keeping you updated as promised. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2015- The documents required for our Response to the letter/memorandum requesting Dismissal of our Motions have been printed and bundled and have as of late this afternoon been hand carried to the District Court in Trenton. This filing consisted of the Reply and a Cover letter addressed to the Judge. Download or read them by clicking on the file name below: COVER LETTER FOR OUR RESPONSE TO DISMISS RESPONSE TO DISMISS SUMMARY JUDGEMENT​​ MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2015- Nick worked many hours over this weekend gathering data for the response to the letter/memorandum he received this past Saturday. (See below) He sent me the draft with his findings late last night and I began preparing the final Reply at 5:00 am this day and completed it about 8:00pm. A few back and forth discussions on content and the final document and the cover letter is ready for submittal to the Court. SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2015- This day Nick received yet another filing from yet another attorney. This submittal which was presented to the Court was called a letter/memorandum​ and is the latest effort by the State Attorneys to get the Brief thrown out, or in the terms of the lawyers, Dismissed. If there were any doubt that we have their full attention now, this flurry of activity should be proof enough that we do. This filing by the Defense is no less faulty than those which have come before it. It is also untimely (late) and according to Federal Rules of the Court, it should not even be accepted by the Court, let alone considered. But the judicial systems, both Federal and State seem to have an aversion to following rules if they run contrary to a specific ideology. Therefore, Nick has informed me that he has begun researching the claims of the defense and will begin preparing a response since we cannot let even faulty submittals go unanswered. Link to all District Court Documents filed to date. http://www.tpath.org/sappa-district-court-documents.html Regards, Dwight and Nick

Latest News on the SAPPA Group's Brief http://www.tpath.org/battle-is-on.html Thanks all, Dwight

The SAPPA Group has been very busy dealing with New Jersey officials, court clerks and attorneys. I promised many of you here in the Gun Forum to keep you up to date on the progress of our Brief. Here is link where you can follow chronologically the events and filings. This log is updated as events occur. http://www.tpath.org/sappa-news-and-reports.html Thanks everyone, keep up the good fight. Regards, Dwight www.tpath.org NOTE: As you read the log linked above keep in mind that the Motion of Default which will be filed with the Court on Thursday will be made available for all to read or download after it is received and sealed by the Court. Once you get to read it you will see that Mr. Purpura pretty much has these people backing into a corner. No Judge ever wants to be on the side of a case which is overturned. Mr. Purpura, in the Motion for Default has given the Court a way out. That is that the Judge could wash his hands of this and order the case moved to the Third Circuit. That is of course what we intended and if the Judge does it, we will not need to file a new Brief for the Circuit Court. The District Court Brief will be the one of record. Remember, our ultimate goal is to get to the US Supreme Court as quickly as possible. If the case gets heard there, it will be very difficult for those Justices, even the liberal ones, to rule against us because we support much of our case on rulings made by those very same liberal Justices. Thanks Dwight

Hi All, I'm sorry that I have not been back here as often as I would like to keep those interested up to date on the progress of our Brief. We have created a chronicalized log of occurrences for the over 100 SAPPA support group members and have decided to share that log with the NJ Gun Forum. So if anyone is interested in what's been going on click the link. http://www.tpath.org/sappa-news-and-reports.html Warm regards to all our friends here in the forum. Dwight and Nick

An update on the progress of The SAPPA Group We were asked to create a one page document that would describe what SAPPA is and the intent of the Federal Brief which was filed in Trenton last week. Click on the link below to read or download that document http://nebula.wsimg.com/c5d4825b848c885826e77e1989fa1e86?AccessKeyId=3221A0C50080D1C903B6&disposition=0&alloworigin=1 Click here for the latest news related to this effort. http://www.tpath.org/sappa.html Personal expenses are growing. Here is a request for help. http://www.tpath.org/sappa-donate-page.html The next step will be the much anticipated Court hearing after the defendants provide the court with their replies. Thanks everyone, Dwight SAPPA Group www.tpath.org

Dear Forum Members, For all those interested in the status of the Brief which has been discussed in this forum, here is an update: This past week the Brief was filed with the Federal District Court in Trenton. This afternoon Mr. Purpura was notified that the filing has been accepted and a docket number issued and the case has been assigned to a Federal Judge. Also the complete list of defendants have been served and provided with the full documentation which includes the brief which will be called Nicholas E. Purpura v Governor Chris Christie, et al. Those served include Governor Christie, the New Jersey Attorney General, the Firearms director, several state and local judges and over 30 lawmakers. The entire Brief including the 19 associated Exhibits can be seen and downloaded from the SAPPA Group web pages. Also the Press Release which will begin to go out to media outlets tomorrow can be seen there as well. Please note that the contact phone numbers for Mr. Purpura have been x'd out on the website document. That was done to prevent his number appearing in open source. If anyone in this forum would like to help get this Press Release out to their favorite media (if there is such a thing) please contact me at [email protected] Please give me a contact number so we can call you. We will then give you a link where the unobscured Press Release can be downloaded and then sent to the media. Here is the link to the SAPPA Group web page. http://www.tpath.org/sappa.html I wish to take this time to thank all those in this forum who have come to our meetings and/or have offered to help. The following few months will see our group working every aspect of publicity we can. Any help from anyone here would be so appreciated. Let's Rock and Roll, Dwight Kehoe SAPPA GroupCCPLAWSUIT 12.pdf www.tpath.org THE SAPPA GROUP for webpage.pdf

Dear SJG, This brief was prepared by individuals with a combined 70 years of experience dealing with Federal Courts. If you read all the claims in this brief you would have seen the intent is not to win in any of the two lower courts. Those jurists serving there are not just part of the problem they are being named as defendants. This case will be won, if we can get the required publicity, in the Supreme Court. Having said that, it would be nice if you had something specific you saw that we may have missed. Generalities are not much help. Thanks for your interest and please contact Nick at eagle4260@optonline if you do have a specific rule violation. Or you can contact me at [email protected] Dwight