Jump to content

nondisclosure

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    167

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    N/A

Posts posted by nondisclosure

  6. Posted

    14 hours ago, njJoniGuy said:

    When the Fed AWB went into effect in Sept 94, the limit on new mags became 10. Older, already owned mags were grandfathered, thus the name "preban" (just a dirty 6 letter word here)

    But our limit here in PRNJ became 15 in 1990, so when Fed AWB kicked in, older 15's were still ok, but new mags were all 10's.

    Fed AWB expired Sept 2004 and we stayed at 15, everyone (well almost) went sky's the limit again.

    Well, we have an UnConstitutional fight on our hands.

  8. Posted

    20 minutes ago, Old Glock guy said:

    "Constitutional," "logical," and "facts" are terms that have never mattered in NJ.  Hard to be optimistic that will suddenly be taken seriously now.  

    Sort of. I don't believe I was old enough to care about the previous mag reduction, but was there a lawsuit regarding the standard mag capacity when they lowered it to 15? If not, then yes it is time to take this seriously, and now there are way more gun owners today than in previous years. That number is also growing daily.

    • Like 1

  10. Posted

    12 hours ago, Regular Guy said:

    I think the injunction should have been granted, but I'm glad this is at least being given a chance to be heard and I think we have a chance to win.  I think the state fails to prove its case.  This is just my 3 cents on why (I'm no lawyer). 

     

    1.  Law abiding citizens, by definition, abide by the law and therefore pose no danger.

    2.  The shooter at the Parkland school in Florida (and several other past active shooter incidents) used 10 round magazines.  So wtf is the state of NJ really achieving here by limiting us to the same devices?

    3.  42 states do not have magazine restrictions, so the demand for standard capacity magazines is much higher than demand for reduced capacity magazines. Therefore, there is nothing dangerous or unusual about standard capacity magazines.  They come with every firearm sold. The reduced capacity (15 or 10 round) magazines are more unusual because there are less of them sold due to only 8 states and Washington DC having magazine bans. 

     

        

     

    Not only that but to further add to #1;

     

    they are making people who DONT break the law FELONS. They are using the law to make us criminals, and at the same time forcing us to give up legal property.

     

    I would also like to add that their argument is very weak to any sane person. I really don't see them winning unless the judge is some mental lefty.

     

    I think we the people should also sue to remove mag capacity as a whole on the pure basis that it is unconstitutional and that standard mags are in very common use as a whole voiding their argument that it is dangerous and unusual. It's blantantly obvious the opposite is true. 

    • Like 1

  11. Posted

    4 minutes ago, vladtepes said:

    I am NOT a lawyer.. 

    but the question to answer are "can you make a pistol in NJ"... if the answer is yes.. then IMO you could make a single shot AR pistol... because a single shot AR pistol is no longer a semi automatic pistol.. and would not be bound by any of the rules related to ownership of a semi automatic pistol.. because.. well to simply put it.. it would NOT be semi auto.. 

    with that said I have owned actual semi auto AR15 pistol.. and currently have a 7.5in AR15 SBR... and IMO at least.. you would totally lose the functional benefits of that platform by being single shot.. 

    the benefit of such a platform is a small compact footprint that can send lots of rounds downrange quickly.. 

    Well, I was wondering how the ar15 pistol would be legally allowed with our current burdensome rules.

     

    the mag outside the pistol grip is one check.

    and I believe the 50oz 3.1# rule also give it the second mark against it, unless I'm wrong about the total weight of the ar pistol?

  14. Posted

    So if I'm reading the semi automatic pistol laws correctly (I'm not a lawyer but I can read) , I could technically;

     

    use an "ar15" lower receiver transferred as a pistol,

     

    Then make it a single shot, thus not creating a semi auto-automatic ar15 pistol- via

     

    http://originalbobsled.com/ARSleds.aspx

    This single shot sled in conjunction with a "fixed mag" kit would seem to  make the ar15 pistol legal as the fixed mag bullet button requires tools and disassembly.

    how feasible is this? Because it's not a "semi auto assault pistol" (God these laws are stupid), this seems to be legal no? Would any FFL and or smith be willing to verify this and or attempt this?

  20. Posted

    On 6/13/2018 at 7:40 PM, Indianajonze said:

    i'd strongly suggest everyone thinking of selling their mags or butchering them to not do so. this bill is as unconstitutional as they come and will be tossed by any court in the country, including liberal ones. i haven't said much because i actually doubted it would pass. clearly our esteemed legislature are not versed on the constitution. ex post facto laws are specifically prohibited, by name, under article 1 section 10 of our trusty document. ex post facto laws are those which make illegal an act which was legal when committed. if you bought 15 round mags legally, they cannot suddenly become illegal. period. done. end of story. (as an aside, bump stock bans will fall as well). not only is murphy a moron, but he's a greedy moron as well. had he allowed simple grandfathering (like the other states have), it would have been harder to challenge. not impossible mind you, just harder. as it stands, this jackass is going to make the taxpayers pay for something that has no chance of standing. if you have 15rd mags in nj, you'll keep 15 rd mags in nj. take it to the bank. the california ban was supposed to have been in effect as of jan 1. the judge in the most liberal court in the country had to stop it for the same reason

     

    the real question for me is where did this attorney general get his law degree? he should be disbarred for giving consent to murphy to sign the bill

    :B:):

     

    Where can I send a small sum of money? Please advise.

  24. Posted

    9 minutes ago, Mr.Stu said:

    Not for a long time yet. There is a 180 day grace period built into the bill that starts after the Governor signs it. Before that expires ANJRPC & NRA will have filed a law suit, part of which will be a temporary injunction to block the law until the case is decided.

    Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
     

    Ok great. Thank you. The fact that we would have to surrender legally purchased items isn't right in my book. Surely, all of us here agree.

×
×
  • Create New...