Jump to content

Bomber

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    680

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

  • Feedback

    N/A

Posts posted by Bomber

  5. Posted

    On 7/18/2022 at 9:30 AM, CMJeepster said:

    Oh, and a quote:  "According to New York City Police Department statistics from 1994 to 2000, trained police officers hit their target on the street from a range of 0 to 2 yards just 38% of the time. At 3 to 7 yards, they missed 83% of the time, Miller wrote." :facepalm:

    The 12 lb. triggers NYPD mandates on their Glocks could be a factor.    

  6. Posted

    3 minutes ago, JackDaWack said:

    A) the ruling applies to a different law

    B) FIDs don't have an automatic approval at 60 days. 

    How about this:

    https://www.njgunlawyers.com/page.php?here=carryPermit

     "Gov. Murphy issued Executive Order 299. Executive Order 299 orders all levels of New Jersey government to find and impose all possible means to thwart or limit implementation of the Bruen decision". 

     

  7. Posted

    31 minutes ago, JackDaWack said:

    Tell them they have 60 days to figure it out, at which point you expect it to be approved or denied. 

    How is that possible when the courts have already ruled in favor of PD's dragging their feet over the 30 day approval window for FID applications?

    https://www.njgunlawyers.com/page.php?here=FID

    Adler v. Livak holds that if a required background check is not completed within the thirty (or forty-five) day period specified under N.J.S. 2C:58-3f, more time must be allowed.

  8. Posted

    8 hours ago, CMJeepster said:

    Democrats push for 1st semi-automatic gun ban in 20 years (yahoo.com)

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-push-1st-semi-automatic-172301252.html

    "This is a uniquely American problem, and assault weapons only magnify the epidemic,” Cicilline said during the committee hearing".

    Thats a lie. 

    On a per capita basis the US has less mass shootings than many other countries.

    Moreover, 400 or so people a year are killed in "mass shootings", of those only a fraction are shot with a semi-auto rifle.  

  10. Posted

    8 hours ago, CMJeepster said:

    How's that gun control working for ya, Phil?  Grocery store owner shot and killed in deadly weekend of violence in Newark, authorities say - nj.com

    Working exactly as planned- The State passes gun control laws. When they inevitably fail to work as claimed Leftists propose another round of gun control laws, i.e. "we need to do more". 

    Win, win for democrats since they never get held accountable for their failures.  

    • Haha 1

  12. Posted

    5 hours ago, always_an_eagle said:

    For references I typically used the guys I used for all my pistol permits so they are all good with me applying. My boss is a notary so he notarized my 3 copies of the application and letter of ownership.

    I have two friends that I've used for references on PP's in the past. They're not gun owners themselves but are fine with me using their names. 

    I'm not sure who I'd use for a third reference and I would feel a little uncomfortable putting people on the spot asking them to sign off and attest to my application. 

  13. Posted

    27 minutes ago, always_an_eagle said:

    Update: My Police Department contacted two of my three references. Asked the ten questions on the application which were yes or no questions, how long they known me and anything else they wanted to add. Whole conversation lasted for five minutes.

    This is one of the reasons I won't be applying anytime soon.  

    Why does the PD have to call the references and ask them the same questions on the application they've already attested to in writing, signed and notarized?

    I guess the PD is hoping they will change their mind or say something that can be used to deny the application. 

  14. Posted

    5 hours ago, gumpracer said:

    Just adding a link to the Parsippany-Troy Hills Police Department website. They have some good info in here that may be of some use.

    "Please note we have had an influx of regular FID applications and handgun permits, along with conceal carry applications due to recent changes revolving around firearms.)"

    Thats interesting.

    So people who didn't bother getting their FID in the past because they couldn't conceal carry are applying for FID and CCW.

    Sounds like gun ownership will be going up in N.J. :good:

  18. Posted

    1 hour ago, Downtownv said:

    It looks like Governor Murphy may have to eat some serious humble pie, as the law he signed doing this to New Jerseyans looks like it’s in severe peril.

    Impossible, there is no humility in Bucky only arrogance..

    BTW Washington state (or was it Oregon) and Rhode Island just passed 10 round mag bans this year as well.

    • Agree 1

  20. Posted

    On 7/5/2022 at 4:23 PM, njviper91 said:

    Id love to know the "certain circumstances" all this to get dems to wave their freak flag and bow down to Murphy, when not one of these will do a damn thing to prevent gun violence.

     

    "Preventing gun violence" is the Big lie, the Kabuki theater of gun control is built upon.

    They know it, we know it and they know, we know, they know it, etc, etc.. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2

  22. Posted

    2 hours ago, bennj said:

    I'm confused (a regular occurrence). Does this mean that Murphy stops ccw in it's tracks by adding all kinds of restrictions, fees, training requirements, sensitive areas, etc. regardless of what Thomas alluded to not doing those things? Does this mean any lawsuits regarding such have to wait to be heard by SCOTUS? Does this mean that at my  current age of 65 I may never be able to ccw in NJ?

    Here is a good take on the situation from a thread on ar15.com about NY CCW restrictions but applies to N.J. as well:

     

    "What you are seeing is what has happened in every other state that has passed shall-issue concealed carry.  Not to the extent NY is going but similar.  The people inconvenienced will complain and changes will be made.  Then lawsuits will happen and then more changes are made.  Then as people adjust to the idea of "people walking around carrying hidden guns" more changes will occur.  My state has had concealed carry for decades and we are still tweaking the law."

    "Back in 2000 when Michigan was trying to go from may-issue to shall-issue we had a state level pro-gun organization trying to kill the bill for the exact same reasons you mentioned.  The people with connections had permits and very few restrictions.  They threw a fit that going to shall-issue would result in a more involved process, a higher fee, and more restrictions on where they could carry.  They had the "I got mine, fuck everyone else" attitude that you seem to have.  Shall issue passed, barely.  Counties like Wayne County, where Detroit is, dug their feet in and refused to issue any permits for almost a year.  Multiple lawsuits had to be filed against them.  The legislature has gone back many times to tweak the law, remove restrictions, and make other changes to improve things".

    "Baby steps, just like how the Dems take away our rights, is how you get the restrictions removed.  The big hurdle is getting shall-issue allowed.  That is still a huge win for NY.  Then you go back and get the restrictions removed".  
     

    .  

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative 2
×
×
  • Create New...