Jump to content

deerpark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    995

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by deerpark

  9. Posted

    A former New York police department sergeant has filed a $10 billion federal civil rights lawsuit against a list of law enforcement and court officials in New Jersey

    Quote

    JACKSON, NJ, January 05, 2021 /24-7PressRelease/ -- A former New York police department sergeant has filed a $10 billion federal civil rights lawsuit against a list of law enforcement and court officials in New Jersey (MARCHISOTTO v. MALIK et al (3:20-cv-20426), New Jersey District Court).

    The case is not about the money, he said, but justice. In the court filing, he says, "I would gladly donate every penny to a charity. But it's time to send a message to the New Jersey Courts run by clown judges, who believe they are above the law."

    John Marchisotto says his civil rights were violated when officers came into his home to take away his guns. The invasion and everything that happened after that are retaliation for Mr. Marchisotto filing another federal lawsuit against many of the people named in this case.

    The complaint filed in the US District Court in New Jersey says in part, "Middlesex County Sheriff's Police Officers … New Jersey State Police along with dozens of heavily armed police personnel, entered my home displaying their high-powered military-style long guns drawn, terrorizing my family. They came to my home to execute a false TERPO petition to seize my licensed firearms. However, their basis of the TERPO search warrant was a complete sham to punish me for the Federal Lawsuit I filed against the State of New Jersey, Middlesex County, the judicial and non-judicial defendants. They knew I was a retired NYPD police sergeant and out of retaliation, they came after my guns."

    TERPO is an Extreme Risk Protective Order act. It was created in New Jersey in 2018 and allows anyone to seek the protective order against anyone else who "poses a danger of causing bodily inquiry to self or others by possessing or purchasing a firearm."

    Mr. Marchisotto said he does have guns. He is a retired law enforcement officer. Furthermore, he bought those guns according to NJ and federal laws. As a police officer, he also received extensive training in the proper use of guns.

    "It's revenge. Pure and simple, revenge. They got mad at me because I know my rights and my rights were violated so I filed suit against them. They want to intimidate me. They hope to scare me into dropping my lawsuit. All they did was make me more determined to make sure justice prevails," the retired police sergeant said. "So, I filed this suit as well."

    He said his rights guaranteed under the First, Second, Fourth, Sixth and 14th Amendments were more than ignored. His rights were intentionally violated.

    "They knew what they were doing. They knew it was illegal. They set things up to try and make it legal, but I know differently. I spent my adult life as a police officer and I know what is legal and what is not," he said. "Yes, I worked in New York, but federal law applies the same in New York as in New Jersey.

    Mr. Marchisotto requested a jury trial. He wants a jury to hear the matter because as many people as possible need to see how he was treated.

    "I've seen what judges in New Jersey will do. I am a victim of their illegal and unethical actions. I want a jury to hear this because I know a whole jury will find the truth and tell the judge. When the judge hears the jury's verdict. He has no choice. He has to go along with what the jury decides," Mr. Marchisotto said.

    For more information or to receive a copy of this and Mr. Marchisotto other court filings and cases, contact him at 732-526-7732.

     

  11. Posted

    8 hours ago, Underdog said:

    Guy wants his freedoms.

    Suppressors are illegal in some unjust states and tax stamps are BS

    Guy shouldn't have to move to a free state (he lives in the US of A), shouldn't have to do the paperwork or pay any fee.

     

    Unfortunately, people are products of their environment.

    It could be argued that NJ is even worse than CA and NY, although its very close.   

    For those who have grown up in this setting, freedom is a scary and foreign concept.

     

  13. Posted

    14 hours ago, JackDaWack said:

    That's far from reality. Every drug would be legal under that system. 

     

    I'm speaking to the point of him knowingly trying to circumvent the law. Whether you agree with it or not. 

    Who else is is buying monocore baffles in hollow fuel filters and passing them off as "solvent traps"

    NFA isn't really a law that you fuck around with and then when caught ask "where's the victim",  that's not reality

     

    Not sure of your point here.

    Are you saying that its somehow less of a victim-less crime if its a federal level infringement as opposed to a state level infringement?

    • Agree 1

  14. Posted

    1 hour ago, JackDaWack said:

    He did, though. 

    Who buys 2 boxes worth of random "fuel filters" from China? 

    I was under the belief the items were legal, im sure he was too.  He most likely saw in the news recently people were getting arrested for these things..he's one of many over the past few months. He tried to get rid of them, which was smart.. 

     

     

    I'm speaking to the point of victim-less crimes. 

    If there  is no victim, there is no crime.

     

     

  15. Posted

    1 hour ago, 10X said:

    No, I made no such statement and hold no such beliefs.  You're thinking of Homeland Security, you know, the ones who actually arrested him.

     

    It can be difficult to determine a "tone" from a text post. 

    It seemed like you were implying that the guy purchased the items intentionally and in doing so, he deserved what he got. 

    I apologize if that wasnt your intention. 

  16. Posted

    7 hours ago, 124gr9mm said:

    Indeed.  If the description provided by Nappan is accurate, it looks like an "Oooops" moment for Homeland and the county prosecutor:

     

    "Nappen said when Moran received the first shipment of silencers, he went to a local auto parts store and showed them to a clerk. The clerk told Moran the devices were not filters and suggested he turn them over to police.

    Moran brought the items to the Carlstadt Police Department and handed them over at the front desk. Ten days later, a second shipment of silencers came to his home – even though Moran thought he’d canceled the order through PayPal.

    Nappen said Moran brought the box of additional silencers to police headquarters. But as he pulled into the parking lot, he was arrested by agents from Homeland Security and the county prosecutor’s office, who had apparently been monitoring his movements.

    “This is all pretty outrageous when you consider he tried to surrender these things,” Nappen told NJ Advance Media."

     

     

    Wait a second.

    In his statements, did Nappen really refer to these things as "silencers"???

     

  17. Posted

    On 10/22/2020 at 11:20 AM, 10X said:

    Deputy fire chief charged with possession of firearm suppressors

    He says he ordered them believing they were fuel filters for his truck*.

    If that defense works, I may have to repatriate to NJ my collection of black Gen4 17-tablet PEZ dispensers.

    These

    *OK, he was arrested while voluntarily surrendering them at his local police station, so maybe it was all a mistake.

     

    Even if it wasnt a mistake, do you really think that a man should be stripped of his freedom, his home raided, for committing a victim-less crime?

    Wheres the victim? 

    Who was harmed or injured?

  18. Posted

    https://www.ammoland.com/2020/10/how-president-trump-saved-our-gun-rights-from-obamas-bump-stock-strawman/

    I'm not going to cut and paste the article but WOW...

    It was all a part of Trump's plan to defang the Left so they couldnt conflate bumpstocks with semi-autos in an effort to essentially ban all firearms...

    Again, WOW.

    What a frigging stretch.  Blatant lie.   

    And nothing about the fact that Trump did it by decree which sets the precedent for future gun grabbers like Harris who is now threatening to do the exact same thing...

     

     

    Nappen!

    How about the fact that Trump's ATF is persecuting almost twice as many people as they did under Obama.

    Is that all part of the plan too???

    At my direction, the Department of Justice banned bump stocks.  Last year, we prosecuted a record number of firearms offenses.

     

     

  19. Posted

    https://www.firearmspolicy.org/nj-lcm-ban-important-brief

    Quote

    PHILADELPHIA (September 24, 2020) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) announced the filing of an important legal brief in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the State of New Jersey’s ban on so-called “large-capacity magazines” that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition.

    The brief is available online at FPCLegal.org.

    New Jersey prohibits magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. Recently, a panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that prohibition, so the plaintiffs have petitioned the full court to rehear the case en banc.

    As recently reported, Judge Matey’s dissent in the panel decision cited FPC and FPF’s previous amicus brief extensively, to document the long history of repeating arms in America. FPC and FPF have filed another brief in support of the petition for rehearing en banc, supplementing and elaborating on the history the court has found useful.

     

    https://www.firearmspolicy.org/third-circuit-upheld-nj-magazine_capacity-limit

    Quote

    WHAT HAPPENED:

    The Third Circuit Court of Appeals today released a 2-1 panel decision in Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, Inc., et al, v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al. affirming the district court’s judgment upholding New Jersey’s limit on ammunition magazines to a capacity of 10 rounds.

    Today’s Opinion determined that the 3rd Circuit had already ruled on the constitutionality of the ban on so-called large capacity magazines (LCMs) in an earlier decision, and that the court was therefore bound to follow its earlier precedent.

    However, there were some significant and positive developments worth taking note of.

    Judge Matey, who authored the dissenting opinion and was the only Judge on the panel who reached the merits of the case, agreed with FPC’s position.  This case in particular underscores how important it is to get the right judges appointed, and then provide them with the resources and insight necessary to get pro-Liberty outcomes.  

     

    • Like 1
    • Informative 1

  20. Posted

    They keep raising taxes, forcing people to flee, reducing the population, netting less tax revenue which then results in more tax increases...

    Maybe cut spending?

    If people could easily flee the state, what percentage of the NJ population do you guys think would simply leave?

    I would guess that 70% of the people would get up and leave NJ tomorrow if it was easy to do so. 

     

     

     

    • Agree 1

  22. Posted

    Yes, I did receive my firearm. 

    I also updated the OP with something that I had completely forgotten:

    "Dick" had me complete an additional form which he himself created... 

     

    Many, if not most of you, have suggested that I mention his name here. 

    Here are my thoughts on doing that. 

     

    I dont think hes a "bad" guy. 

    I just think he is, as someone else mentioned, a Fudd FFL, making it even more difficult to buy a firearm in NJ, as though it wasnt already difficult enough.  *facepalm*

     

    I always try to maintain good relations with people and if at all possible, resolve any kind of disagreement in a diplomatic and tactful way. 

    Throughout this whole process, I think he was relatively "normal" and I always try to conduct myself in a mature, adult fashion.  :-)

    So, theres no "animosity", atleast not on my part and I dont believe any on his either. 

     

    The only thing which left me wondering was his insistence on getting my social security number. 

    The stories and "lies" which he was telling me in order to try and get this info...  SMH. 

     

     

  23. Posted

    On 9/15/2020 at 8:28 PM, Antonio5 said:

    So what happened to deerpark? What was the end of the story?

    BTW, I went to my FFL today to start NICS and was told that it takes about a week to get through. Really??? The things got that crazy or it was a little lie?

     

    For anyone who was following this thread, I apologize for the disappearing act as I had to travel for work and just got back. 


     

     

×
×
  • Create New...