68chris

I have been thinking about this topic as of late. The Pantano case http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/appellate-division-published/2013/a1682-11.html is an example of an applicant who was denied a ccw and fought all the way to the superior ct of Nj, appellate court, wheras he lost. I wont bring up all the details, it is very good reading, but here is a man who clearly showed a justifiable need to carry concealled. Of course the judge ruled otherwise and did not think he showed the court that he had a " justifiable" need. If Pantano can not show a justifiable need, no one can. This is proof positive that the justifiable need clause is just a defacto ban on ccw in nj. My thoughts are to apply for a ccw, and state on the application, " i reject the states request to show justifiable need", and rather assert my second ammendment right to keep and "bear" arms. Of course I will lose and be denied on all levels, local, municipal, superior and appellate, but I think the ticket is to make it to the 3rd curcuit court of appeals (which is the federal level). That is where you can make the argument that your 2nd amm rights have been violated by the state of NJ, using in re: 7th curcuit lets posner decision. http://www.thegunmag.com/7th-circuit-lets-posner-ruling-stand-huge-win-for-carry-says-saf/ That, I think, is the only chance.

yes, i rember seeing that advertised somewhere. wilson is one of my favorite 1911's, good luck.

would that be the wilson combat pistol?

New member, Chris from Colts Neck saying hi!