Jump to content

MacDan

Members
  • Content Count

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by MacDan


  1. 16 hours ago, Screwball said:

     


    I was looking at a strap, but personally, rather not have my hand restrained to the forend like that. The Magpul setup, fits perfectly around my hand, and is kind of usable shooting with my weak hand (right hand as support). Good position for the light, so I’m happy with it.

    The TAC-14 doesn’t have a stud on the grip, so either add one (not a fan of) or go with a sling adapter. Leaning towards the latter... but got to think it through.

    With the TacStar sidesaddle, the plate comes back to like 1/4” to 3/8” from the edge of the receiver, at the point the QD mount will be located. From what I saw online, it seems that the socket for the mount favors the receiver side. Probably going to be an issue there.

    Sling will be a Magpul, either MS3 or MS4. I prefer the QD mounts, so it would be a MS4, and possibly modifying the sidesaddle plate to fit (shouldn’t be hard, just Dremel a relief around the socket). Other option would be a MS3, then a Midwest Industries plate, which accepts HK clips (like 90% sure the Magpul para-clips work with it). That would be no modification, since it is inline with the plate.

     

    Be careful picking plates that work with HK/mash clips and guessing they will work with Paraclips. I did the same thing when trying to build a sling system for my 2 AR's and found that most of them DO NOT work with the Para-clips. I tried the GG&G, and the one from Yankee Hill. I ended up returning all the stuff and the MS3 and getting a MS4 and using all QD stuff, which was hard but not impossible on my 9mm AR with a A2 stock and PRI gasbuster handle (Troy makes a mount that is hard to find and I believe discontinued, but still available.) I plan on getting a TAC-14 when the detachable magazine ones are available, was slightly interested in one before, but now I am actually going to buy as the round count is no longer an issue. I will get a QD single point attachment so I can use my sling on this as well, not sure which yet.......


  2. I am getting a GLOCK 19 GEN5 with one of my 2 permits on the way. Like yourself, with my second I am interested in getting a 1911, I do not want to spend a lot on it. Looking at new Colt M1991 or the Series 70 but cannot find any stock in SJ. Not completely sold on 1911, if I can't get one in the price range I would consider Beretta M9 or SIG P320 if I can find any around. 


  3. 4 minutes ago, djw2033 said:

    This response is not intended as legal advice but is offered for informational purposes only.  As indicated in our earlier e-mail, the Consent Order declared the provision prohibiting possession of a stun gun unconstitutional, making that prohibition unenforceable.  So, unless the law is changed, New Jersey law contains no permitting or similar requirement that must be satisfied in order to possess a stun gun (whether at home or in public).  And, as previously indicated, there are limitations under the current law which are not affected by the Consent Order.  You may wish to consult a private attorney should you require legal advice on this issue.

     

     

    That was my final message from the ag

    Sounds to me by the reading of the emails you received they do not have any issue with carrying.

    • Like 2

  4. In related news Philadelphia repealed their ban yesterday, so you can now carry them in Pennsylvania as a whole and in the city. So this makes it more viable for me for sure, as the Pennsylvania laws are more certain when it comes to carry on persons. Seeing all these new repeals makes me more confident NJ isn’t going to put any restrictions on carry, and that we could in fact carry now, but I don’t want to be the test case that’s for sure. 

    • Like 2

  5. The more I read and research this issue and research how other states handled it when they repealed their laws, I think we can carry (I’m no expert or lawyer). It seems like as of now the only prohibition is those under 18, felons, and on school or college property. When DC repealed their ban they basically became unregulated except in those examples and more specific cases of government property where they were prohibited. My concern is this gets changed in the near future with additional regulation, but I could be wrong, NJ could just leave them unregulated like DC. 

×
×
  • Create New...