Jump to content

FairbanksRusty

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    176

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    N/A

Posts posted by FairbanksRusty

  1. Posted

    1 hour ago, Mr.Stu said:

    I have always had my doubts about the statute anyway. How can anything be "continuously" fed into a semi-automatic? That would be a harder sell, and I don't have the funds to be a test case.

    “Continuous” was language first added to New York’s SAFE Act in 2013. Its intent was to close the door on belt-fed semi-auto’s like AR15’s and 1919’s. Yes, such things exist  

    What happens elsewhere finds its way here. 

  2. Posted

    16 hours ago, DirtyDigz said:

    Please SCOTUS, release BRUEN ASAP so the NJ legislature gets so consumed trying to prevent legal carry they forget all the rest of this B.S.

    Bruen isn’t going to save NJ. Half a century of an anti-gun culture is not going to be turned on its head overnight. 
     

    As usual, last minute warning from the ANJRPC over what’s cooking in Trenton. Leaves just enough time for a handful of the one million gun owners of New Jersey to flood the internet with negative memes of Gov. Murphy and his teeth. 
     

    Until you have people who can be taken seriously from the pro-gun side, advocates who can sit at a collective bargaining table and reach agreements face to face; nothing will ever change. I haven’t heard one negative comment yet from Jack C. or Philip R. on this subject. 
     

    Phil has been on a roll since he announced his candidacy in 2016. 

    • Agree 1

  3. Posted

    1 hour ago, marlintag said:

    Let's see how broad or narrow the SCOTUS ruling is. SCOTUS may craft a ruling broad enough to deal with many of the attack strategies that NJ may have. Remember NJ can kick and scream but, SCOTUS is still of a higher power. Look at DC they got carry not too long ago didn't they? and that was only from an appeals court...

    D.C. has granted but 8000 permits, with 60% of those going to non-residents (mostly commuters from VA & MD) 

    D.C. residents continue to lag behind and wait. 700k+ residents live in D.C. 

     

  4. Posted

    15 minutes ago, pjd832 said:

    They combined NJ, MD, and sprinkled in a little CA laws and shoved it up our a$$ in DE they also, which wasn’t mentioned in that article, passed starting up a P.O.C. process like NJ nics

    so instead of them just running the fed background where I get a truly “instant”  response of 7-13 seconds from submission it’ll be some intentional bogging down of the process by a biased state employee and days or weeks as a means to throttle back sales of the things not banned like NJ …

    also the “grandfathering”  has a couple cute caveats that they didn’t mention in that article… in regards to the ar/aks….“the burden of proof lies on the individual to prove he  legally possessed the military style assault kid, unborn baby, kitten, puppy killing banned weapon prior to enactment of the legislation  to avoid felony prosecution” 

    so a person that has purchased items for 25+years, moved multiple times, realizing all sales are final, and really didn’t see a need to keep a receipt that fades to blank paper for their wife to “see” is  now screwed… 

    in regards to the “grandfathering” of greater than 17 round mags… it’s is only for Delaware concealed carry holders… and the exemptions are for active LE/Mil not retired/separated in good standing/prior service or anyone else that is in a weapon carrying position  but not a “sworn law enforcement officer”  etc… 

    so those that didn’t “need” a cc permit prior and did t have one are screwed… and while de does issue more than nj…. It’s all dependent on the persons county prothonotary and superior court judge discretion… I’ve know a a large number of people that were denied for nonsensical reasons 

    not to mention that being they tied this to a permit received from a  questionable approval process it didn’t receive as strong an opposition because all the current permit holders felt … “well it’s messed up but I’m ok so I’m not that worried” however in a “may issue” state it’s not not a far stretch to envision that there are new more stringent guidelines for issuance that are more inline with NJ “may issue” and  the when current permit holder attempt to renew they will  not be reissued….it’s already being pushed in the back rooms of the DE house/senate that there are too many people with permits….so I can see that in the future as well

     

    DE was always a weird situation… Democrat controlled but not on gun control bs….. I guess with all the NJ/NY/MD people migrating here fleeing taxes etc they brought their liberal bs and now we are NJ west lol

    Rhode Island this week voted on some measures that will soon hit the Governor’s desk for signing.

    https://www.providencejournal.com/story/news/politics/2022/06/14/ri-gun-control-laws-senate-committee-vote-high-capacity-magazines/7621677001/

  6. Posted

    2 hours ago, Bklynracer said:

    Heard on the radio that NY sounds worried and is already getting contingence plans,

    One being no carry in sensitive ares, guessing those are all the normal places. What caught my attention was they mentioned "mass transit".

    Is mass transit considered a sensitive area in other Free states?

    That basically means that the ten's of thousands if not hundreds will not have a right to carry most of the day, 5 days or more a week.

    No one should ever conceive them of allowing concealed carry in any of the five boroughs. That’s never happening. No one is getting a concealed carry permit to accompany them to shop on 5th Ave. during the Christmas season so they can feel safe. 
     

    New Jersey is nothing more than a 6th borough. 

    • Agree 1
    • Thanks 1

  11. Posted

    14 minutes ago, Displaced Texan said:

    Yeah, I know it’s Yahoo news, but here is a bit of info on what’s being considered for ‘improved’ background checks. 
     

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-gun-negotiators-hit-snag-194330282.html

     

    Im actually not that butt hurt about considering juvenile records in NICS checks. 
     

    While many kids do stupid shit when they are young, I think the record needs to be considered. 

    If the juvenile records were included in a background check, Gendron, Cruz & Roof may have been prevented from legally purchasing their firearms. 

  12. Posted

    9 minutes ago, Old Glock guy said:

    Sounds like the only way this could work is if they had a comprehensive gun registry.  I guess we already have one in NJ.  Anyone know if the same is true in NY?

    Handguns are registered in New York, as well as whatever falls into the category of an “assault weapon” that had to be registered after the SAFE Act was implemented. Anything that qualifies as a “firearm” needs to be registered.
     

    Long guns like your Winchester 94 or your Mossberg shotgun, do not fall into the category of a firearm. It’s been a while since I looked at their penal code, things may have changed. They certainly did today.  

  14. Posted

    1 hour ago, High Exposure said:

    Any bit that can get through the barrel, can get though the muzzle device.

    Except TROY muzzle devices. They are hard as hell and impossible to get though without special bits, that you will end up trashing.

    By far the hardest muzzle brakes I’ve ever drilled through are from Troy. 
     

     

  17. Posted

    New Yorker’s have a short attention span. 

     In 2001, they implemented CoBIS, the Combined Ballistic Identification System, in one of the year’s state budget bills. This applied to handguns. According to the law, gun sellers were required to send firearms to a CoBIS center where fired shell casings from those guns would be entered into a statewide databank. It is to be noted that the state spent $32 million on CoBIS since the creation of the program in January of 2001, and not one crime has been solved with this technology. It was discontinued in 2012. 
     

    • FacePalm 1

  19. Posted

    3 hours ago, Lawnmower2021 said:

    The Globe and Mail: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-a-ban-on-the-sale-of-handguns-its-about-time/

    "Hunting Rifle" = good, everything else = bad. This is an opinion piece but will likely echo across Canadian media.

    After reading that article, handgun hunters in bordering U.S. states would disagree with the statement that handguns are useless for hunting. 
     

     

    • Agree 1

  20. Posted

    3 hours ago, DirtyDigz said:

    Agreed - for all its ills, the NRA had political clout as a representative of a huge voter block.

    “Had” is the key word here  

    The NRA membership has vacillated between 4 million to 6 million(?) members for the last three decades. No one knows the real number. That’s not a good sign. 
     

    Today’s millennials, the CRT-educated, the gender-vacillating him, her, it, binary, secondary, tertiary, etc. aren’t joining the NRA. 
     

    That’s not a good thing. 

  21. Posted

    2 hours ago, 10X said:

    I'd like to hear the board members from NJ explain why they chose to continue supporting LaPierre.

    I agree. 
     
    Too much dirt surfaced after NY’s AG findings. 
    https://slate.com/transcripts/MmxWWWs4bFJCMHA0eXRqeFFhT2tuOW5Mb2VTT09RM2ppV2lpV3EvY25aaz0=

     

    LaPierre needs to be ousted, but it seems like everyone who gets a seat in the NRA’s platinum lounge for the annual session of ass-slathering believes it’s worth being complicit and voting LaPierre in despite his extravagant lifestyle and squandering of NRA’s millions. 
     

    They deserve to fail. 

×
×
  • Create New...