Jump to content

JackDaWack

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    7,896

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by JackDaWack

  1. Posted

    13 hours ago, GRIZ said:

    If a prosecutor is looking at trigger or sight mods you're in more trobule.  There had to be something wrong in the SD shooting to get down to these factors.

    I agree. 

     

    I always believed that the shoot was either good, or... not. The only way a trigger job becomes an issue is if it appears you didn't mean to fire the gun, or hit something/one you shouldn't have. 

     

    Will the prosecution argue you made your gun easier to use and more accurate? Or that you didn't have control of the firearm?

    • Agree 1

  3. Posted

    17 hours ago, b47356 said:

    Of course not.

    Does that make it legal for a state to harbor illegal immigrants? How about making sure said illegals don't run into those fed officers by the front door by taking them out a back door?

    Now we have states declaring that schedule 1 drugs are ok to possess and use. And the admin stands around doing nothing.. (well, they did add a note to the 4473.. I guess that is something)

    But a state passes something that says that they will no longer cooperate on 2A related things? Well that ends up in court really quick.. and we all know how it ends up going for that state. Maybe they should of stuck with illegals and pot.

       

    Well, you can't pass a law the would inhibit the feds from doing their job. A state is free to tell the Feds if they want to enforce THEIR federal law, they are on their own. A state is not required to communicate if a federal law is broken. More so, there are no federal laws against harboring illegals, unless of course if they are know fugitives. 

     

    There has been nothing done to a state that simply said they would not cooperate or communicate with the ATF. 

  4. Posted

    6 hours ago, Vdep217 said:

    Actually they are.  They can be more restrictive but not less.  But the administration won't do anything about the states not following it.

     They would have to go through preemption wich has only been attempted unsuccessfully 3 times since tge constitutions inception.  And if memory serves ne 1832 was the last time

    A state like NJ, it's officers do not enforce federal law. A state level police officer  lacks the power to arrest someone on federal charges. 

    The supremacy clause is why they can walk into any state and arrest anyone for having broken federal law. 

  5. Posted

    On 6/7/2023 at 6:06 PM, b47356 said:

    So it is still illegal to possess schedule 1 drugs? Imagine that.

    I've long wondered how democrats square the idea of sanctuary cities/states and state legalization of pot with their fight against things like 2nd amendment sanctuary states.

    How does ignoring federal immigration and drug law go untouched in court?

    States are not required to enforce federal law, that's how. 

  6. Posted

    On 6/5/2023 at 5:48 PM, 1LtCAP said:

    what do we think the chances of this getting tossed are? seems to be a lot of injunction action going on

    It's getting tossed, how soon no one knows. With a preliminary injunction out of Texas, it's now going to ping-pong through the court system. 

    SCOTUS would ultimately rule the same way they did against the EPA last session, even if most arguments thus far are on other constitutional issues. Seems like the rule has a number of pitfals from regulatory issues, vagueness, and the obvious 2a issues. 

    • Agree 2

  9. Posted

    On 6/2/2023 at 1:40 AM, GRIZ said:

    But he's looking at the problems Adams is having.

    Honestly surprised that we haven't been targeted yet. 

     

    Op, my wife went on disability and FMLA this past fall. Your looking at 2 months for a check to show up

  11. Posted

    I grew tired of the constantly yearly call to bargain down the price... " sorry no new promotions, oh you really are going to cancel, OK we have the cheaper price now" 

    It's good if it has what you need or want, but I just want to stream music and there are cheaper alternatives. It's also good if you live out in the middle of no where. But around here there is enough tree coverage to get spotty reception in the summer. 

  12. Posted

    10 minutes ago, 1LtCAP said:

    soo....attaching(permenantly) a brake to bring the length to/above 16" is no longer an option?

     

     

    i'm kinda sad to say this....but our president trump encouraging them, then letting them ban bumpstocks was the precedent for this. or at least one of the precedents.

    It's says to make the barrel 16" or longer, the FATF has always recognized a pinned and welded brake as part of the barrel. 

  13. Posted

    1 hour ago, Mr.Stu said:

    It isn't at Alito's door yet. It isn't even at the 3rd Circuit, quite. NJ filed a notice to appeal - that's like saying "I'm going to file an appeal". It is not actually an appeal.

    When they do file it, it will go to the 3rd Circuit. If we're lucky it will go to someone like Judge Hardiman or Judge Bibas. They have a record of supporting 2A in their dissentions in prior cases. If the 3rd upholds the PI, then NJ has the option to make an emergency appeal to SCOTUS. That is when Alito gets to decide on his own, or to consult the rest of SCOTUS.

    If the 3rd Circuit Judge rules to stay the PI, our side has the option to make the emergency appeal to SCOTUS. When it gets to Alito, he has the same options as if NJ had filed the emergency appeal.

    I think the primary point to consider is that if the 3rd Circuit decides to overturn Bumb, Alito could fast track an appeal to the "shadow court" and have that overturned within a few short months. 

  14. Posted

    13 hours ago, b47356 said:

    I don't know why this keeps getting thrown out like it means something. Alito isn't going to show up in Philly and say "We really meant it when Bruen was written" and "poof", like magic, all the same courts that ignored Heller for years are going to say "My bad" and start following SCOTUS.

    When the 3rd slow walks things like the 2nd did (after removing the TRO), the same thing will happen - SCOTUS will write a sternly worded letter, and things will move at a slightly faster glacial pace. I don't know about the rest of you think, but didn't that mention by SCOTUS really speed things up in the 3rd? 2 months since oral argument, is there an over-under on how long they sit on ruling it? And during this wait, _nothing_ is going on in district court for these cases.

    Do you know how circuit assignments work? 

    He is responsible for ANY "emergency" based appeals, which this will ultimately fall under.

  16. Posted

    Best case for someone already established with joint accounts is to place notifications on  withdrawals and payments. 

    There are also ways to put money into interest bearing accounts under only your name in the name of "retirement".. 

    No one said you couldn't get creative to avoid the unnecessary trust conflict. 

    At the end of the day, money earned is typically communal within a marriage unless otherwise stated.  

  17. Posted

    18 hours ago, Bomber said:

    I've heard family court judges enjoy throwing out pre-nuptial agreements?

    Not sure how they just throw out a legally binding document unless someone violated an agreement. 

    It's also why you can't half ass a prenuptial, if it's not written clearly and both parties don't have independent counsel, than it can be disputed. 

  18. Posted

    On 5/3/2023 at 2:47 PM, Bomber said:

    No way should men have joint bank accounts these days, way too risky. Doesn't matter how long you've been married.

    Should be like the old days when the man owned everything, kept the wives on their best behavior.

    Of course thats getting harder to do as more women are out earning their husbands now. I've got two neighbors that are stay at home dads living off their wives, but they'd still probably get boned in a divorce. 

    Me and the wife, and she makes 2x my salary, have separate accounts. 

    We decided early on that we would maintain seperate accounts, determine what we each would contribute, and then put money into a joint account for monthly expenses. 

    It's works well. 

    She has sperate savings as do I. 

    Our joint account basically only has a month's worth of bills in it. 

    If we want to make big purchase we then discuss how to pay or save for it. 

    A lot of reasons for this, she has student debt and I don't. I have some inheritance money, and most likely more coming in the future. We don't have to justify what we are spending our own money on etc. 

    Money is the #1 reason people get divorced. 

    • Agree 3

  24. Posted

    Yeah, they finally realized no one would touch a "smart gun" with a ten foot pole, and thus no one was really interested in developing a the application to a point it made sense. Sure a lot of smart guns were ultimately prototyped, but nothing was being marketed. 

     

    So, they decided an FFL just has to offer a "smart gun" as an inventory item. 

     

    If I were an FFL, I would buy one smart gun and stick it at the back of the safe to never see daylight. 

    • Agree 1

  25. Posted

    On 4/3/2023 at 9:54 AM, Carolina Native said:

    After getting my permit in December, I convinced a friend to get his application in before the cost went up with the new law.  It's now 4 months with the Sparta police and he's still waiting. 

    There are no problems on my friend's part.  The department just doesn't seem to be getting anything issued.  My friend was told a couple weeks ago that the SPD is working on applications from late October.  Something appears amiss to me.  At this rate it could be June or July for him.  Anyone hearing similar stories?

     

     

    Yup... I was not happy with their timeline.. especially when it was indicated they had two officers working on permits requests. It mine 4 months to be approved through the PD. They also called My boss, which was kinda irritating when I don't recall having a job was a requirement. 

×
×
  • Create New...