Jump to content

Spartiati

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    434

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

  • Feedback

    83%

Posts posted by Spartiati

  1. Posted

    There's one on my truck rear window too.It's right above this one ce81e17470fad9f20dd2e87493e73fd7.jpgI think I have an extra NJ2AS from last year. PM me a shipping address and I'll drop it in the mail for you.

    Unfortunately this one has two errors. The second letter in molon is Greek letter omikron not theta. Also the last letter in labe is epsilon not Sigma.

  2. Posted

    No one should have any reason to celebrate Drake being denied. Klukowski also makes some very wrong assumptions.

     

    I agree, I had several issues with the article:

     

    "In that regard Drake had some baggage. It might have forced the justices to rule on whether concealed-carry permits are unconstitutional."

     

    This wasn't the ask.  Gura wasn't arguing that permits are unconstitutional but rather that arbitrary requirements to issue the permit are unconstitutional.

     

    "He is also saying the statute’s requirement that an applicant be of “good moral character” is unconstitutional." i.e. law abiding citizen

     

    Really, I certainly didn't get that in my read... 

  3. Posted

    As it stands right now since PA no longer honors Utah the only state that you gain with the Utah is Washington state. Florida gives you New Mexico. If you have both and don't travel to Washington State or plan to. May as well not even renew Utah. Just keep Florida.

    You get Minnesota with Utah which you don't get with FL.  I got it because I go fishing in boundary waters. 

  7. Posted

    Interesting.. I don't know how true that is but if so, maybe the next peaceful protest in trenton should look like this. Of course I wouldn't advise it unless a few thousand of us show up doing the same.

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    If we started doing it would be an easy fix now, legislature will just ban the practice and will say it's in the best interest of the government.  

  8. Posted

    Well it was was a nice two years of hoping.  Basically the US Supreme Court has confirmed that their decision in Heller is BS and basically state legislatures can use what ever logic they want to prevent people from exercising their 2nd Amendment rights outside their home.  A sad day in America.... 

  11. Posted

    I had Raptor Pro. Was a great pistol. Sorry I sold it.

     

    I now have a Super Carry Ultra HD which has turned out to be a great pistol. Very accurate and since a couple hundred rounds went through it has run flawlessly. Only complaint I have was factory finish was not durable. Sent it to Severns and had hard hat finish done which has been great.

  15. Posted

    something i didn't think about until last night about this being pushed back a session. 

     

    1.  were any of the other carry cases that they didnt take postponed or just declined after the first review?

    2.  were heller and/or mcdonald held back?

    I thought the same thing. Kachalsky (New York Case) was denied at first conference.

  16. Posted

    Seems to me that story is full of errors. The AG has no standing so she can't appeal anything to SCOTUS. Only thing she did was request enbanc, but to my knowledge this has not been granted, did I miss something?

     

    Gotta love the same old BS lines aswell i.e. more CCW holders will mean shootouts everywhere...

  17. Posted

    Here's a truly day-brightening passage from the linked article on Scotusblog:

     

    "If indeed the Court has adopted a policy of relisting cases before granting, it may be akin to a “stop, look, and listen” after a provisional decision to grant – intended to give the Justices and their clerks additional time to review grant candidates for vehicle problems or other concerns. Maybe the Justices decided after dismissing three cases as improvidently granted this Term that they need one last check before giving a case the nod; perhaps it’s only a temporary measure."

     

    Trying not to get my hopes up too much, but this is nice.

    I'm not convinced we can read too much into this though. There were a bunch of petitions denied this week as well after having been relisted.

  21. Posted

    Now, they could very well write a per curiam opinion and decide the case without oral argument, but I highly doubt they'll do that for this case. Besides, don't you want Ms. Wood arguing before the highest court in the land? I would line up outside for days just to see that!

     

    But I think the most likely scenario is that they have the 4 votes for a grant, but the 5th one they are not 100% sure about, so they're giving him time to think about it.

     

    It could also be that they want to convince a 6th Justice to vote with the majority. My guess would be Elena Kagan would be that 6th Justice. That seems less likely though.

    Would definitely be entertaining, but the 3rd curcuit's opinion is just such a bad opinion I think can easily decide without orals. I'm no attorney but anyone with basic reasoning skills can see the issues and consequences of their ruling if it stands. Will be a tough week of waiting.

  22. Posted

    It's hard to say but I would say it's a good sign. They denied Woollard (MD) and Kachalsky (NY) right off the bat. 

     

    The main reasons why they relist cases:

     

    One or more of the Justices needed more time to consider

    One or more of the Justices wants to write a dissent of a denial or grant

    Wouldn't it be great if they wrote a reversal?  Given how horrible the 3rd circuit decision was it would be so so nice....not holding my breath though...

×
×
  • Create New...