Jump to content

marlintag

Premier Member
  • Content Count

    124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    50%

Community Reputation

92 Excellent

About marlintag

  • Rank
    NJGF Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yes, the goal of the today's Democrats is to eliminate private firearms ownership in it's entirety. On another note, I feel stupider after listening to a Biden speech.
  2. I have decided to end this sale, items will no longer be for sale. Moderators can message me for any additional information. Please remove listing.
  3. Sold to bossnagy pending funds and meeting agreement.
  4. This will be sold as a lot. Federal 150 grain soft point 100 rounds Winchester 170 grain 33 rounds Lever Evolution 30 rounds Hornady Sub-Sonic 7 rounds 170 rounds total for 160$
  5. I stand corrected... though in my town they would put me handcuffs or worse....
  6. For sale some hard to find 30-30 ammo for your lever guns. 170 rounds of 30-30 total. Asking 160$, I am in Middlesex County. First person to say "I'll take it wins". Please PM me if you have additional questions.
  7. Yes...... I was aware of the origin of the article when i posted it......The fact it comes from an anti-gun source makes it even better.
  8. I would read this: NYSRPA v. Corlett: The Supreme Court’s Next Big Gun Case, Explained (thetrace.org) I remain very optimistic on this case as it is the first of it's kind. According to the article, there are a number of potential outcomes. The worst case scenario is that NY, NJ, CA simply ignore the ruling forcing us common folk to file individual lawsuits against the "issuing authority" which would then result in the "issuing authority" losing in court on an individual basis and being forced to issue a CCW permit. Though, based on what happened in Illinois and Washington DC, the states/city threw up their hands in defeat and accepted "shall issue". The best case scenarios is either a broad "originalist" ruling or a ruling to the lower courts to review 2a cases entirely different resulting in "shall issue". I feel good about this one, it's the first real gun case the supremes have taken in a decade, Are "crumbs" the only thing we have to look forward to? I think not! 22 States are "Shall issue" 21 States are "constitutional carry" there are only 7 states left that are "holdouts", they must and will be brought to heel by SCOTUS eventually.
  9. Yup! You can appendix carry with 17+ round mags all day every day, buy PCC's, all the suppressors you can afford, SBR's, binary triggers the list goes on an on... Enjoy! I pray I could do the same.
  10. umm no, they took NYRP v Corlett that's of the biggest consequence!
  11. Didn't this AG do the same thing in Rogers V Grewal? Disgusting! Every gun case from NJ in the SCOTUS pipeline is treated with disrespect and ignorance by the AG. I hope SCOTUS takes ours instead of CA and humiliates NJ.
×
×
  • Create New...