nj22

Has your GP refused to write the letter, or are you just assuming he won't? I suspect the prescribing physician will have no problem supplying a letter that states they have no reason to believe you are a threat to yourself or others. If they believed that you were they would be obligated to commit you. They cannot speak to what they do not know, however they can (and should have no problem) stating that they are not treating you for any condition that would make you unfit to own a firearm (assuming that this is true). .

I'm very jealous--would love the SS model, but it was a bit more than I wanted to spend and not ambi like my 85. I had some infrequent FTE's early on with my CZ. About one every 100 rounds. I was annoyed to say the least because CZ's are known for their reliability and I wasn't looking for a "project" gun but something reliable out of the box. CZ-USA ended up polishing the chamber and installing an extra power extractor spring for me free of charge. No problems since (and many different rounds tested). If you want to try to solve the problem yourself there are a few things you can do. First, be sure to mark the mags that are giving you problems. A piece of duct tape on the bottom, for example. If it's only one mag (or only the pinned mags) giving you trouble you found the culprit. Second, if you have the right size punch, you can remove the extractor. CZ's are shipped well lubed, and it's possible there's some crud behind the extractor claw (this is a fairly common problem with these models and can be the result of dirt attaching to too much oil). If this doesn't work you can call CZ and ask them to send you an extra power extractor spring. Unfortunately I believe these need to be cut down to fit, which is kind of a pain. You can also get a heavier recoil spring--CZ's are notoriously undersprung. This may help. CZ-USA was very helpful in my experience, and you may need to send it back. If you do expect a chamber polish and new springs. Made a world of difference.

Again, thanks for all the suggestions. PeteF--I appreciate the concerns, and I would share them with you if I didn't know most of the guys involved. The firearms portion of the evening would be on the early side--before any alcohol--and involves a group of somewhat nerdy late-20s to early 30-somethings who would much rather be home watching netflix than out at a strip club. This will be a rather tame affair. Of course the obligatory bachelor party events will unfold later in the day. But a nice afternoon on the trap range shouldn't pose a safety concern, especially because we plan to have a safety instructor present. In any case, I'll give a call to some of the ranges mentioned. Thunder Mountain tops the list if the weather permits. Otherwise RTSP seems a good bet if we can rent out the space after hours.

Thanks for all the suggestions. Indeed, there's no way we're going to bullet hole. That's just local to me. Gun for Hire does events, and it would be great, but it's very expensive per person. RTSP, alternative, will rent the entire range and provide 1 gun and a box of ammo per guest for less than half the cost. It's indoors, however. Love the outdoor idea. Will check into the shotgun/AC thing.

Does thunder mountain rent shotguns? They're closed today, but will give a call later in the week.

Wow--I didn't even now that was possible. Are any of these ranges close to the border? I'll definitely look into it. I would need some kind of instructor on hand, however, since I'm only familiar with the operation of semi-autos and there are a few first timers.

My buddy is getting married soon and as a member of the wedding party I'm helping to plan the bachelor party. It goes without saying, but I will anyway, that there will be absolutely no drinking and firearms, no bad behavior at the range, and no illegal or unethical behavior of any kind. The plan was to start the day in testosterony fashion--perhaps a steak breakfast then a trip to the range. I have plenty of firearms experience, the groom is limited to a few trips to the range with me, and a few in the party have never handled a firearm. All are supportive and interested in the outing, however. Most of the party lives in NYC. One option is to meet at a local NJ range (IE bullet hole) where I can give the safety instruction on my firearms. But the groom has already been through those paces, and I'd like it to be something new for everyone. Plus I'm not a certified safety instructor. My thought was a trip up to RSTP and a private lesson on a platform none of us have tried--AR15 and maybe a magnum revolver. Perhaps calling Gun for Hire to do a one-off lesson on safety and marksmanship? This way we have no firearms in the car when we leave and can head right back to Manhattan. My only concerns are 1) I don't think RSTP allows reservations, and I don't want us all waiting to get two lanes next to each other. 2) the groom is more of a clay target guy. Unfortunately I don't know any trap ranges that rent firearms. Any thoughts on a more interesting outing? Thanks for the help!

CZ Custom shop. The site says they're cocobolo, and my hope is that they are natural--ie the color change is the point where the hardwood (dark) meets the sapwood (light). But I have no idea. The site also says they are sold out, but I've found that half of the "sold out" items are actually in stock if you call and ask.

I have fairly large hands, so I'm perhaps not the best person to ask. They're "thin" grips in name, however I'd say they are as thick as the CZ rubber grips and perhaps a hair thicker than the factory plastic.

No fans of the bi-color, huh?

It's funny, when I bought mine a little over a year ago I asked around local shops and was told they just don't move. These places stopped ordering cz's because they would sit on the shelf for months without getting a second glance.

Looking mighty handsome in the new wood. Can't wait to see how these grips handle on the range, but that great CZ feel is definitely improved with wood. Also received a nice flashlight for the holiday. Thought I'd photograph them together since that seems to be the thing to do.

Overthinking it! Planning a new purchase is half the fun, isn't it? I would indeed probably go with the 1911. Just wanted to hear other opinions. I have heard that the 10 round mags can be less reliable, although not always. My fear is that the 1911 platform occasionally requires TLC--ramp polishing, some fitting etc. I did that with my CZ and didn't love the experience. That said, it's a dream now and it feeds everything without hiccup. It's even cycled dud rounds where the primer went off the the powder didn't. As far as 8 rounds being enough, it definitely is. For me the firearm is a range toy first and foremost. I only load 5 rounds at a time. It's more the math of the thing. If I only get 8 rounds with a 1911 and maybe 7 with a revolver, why not go revolver? I can shoot cheap 38s for the range and have 357 at home. Then again, I really love the 1911 history. Plus it makes a bigger hole. Anyway, I'm a big fan of the CZ, and would prefer to keep it. If limited to 10 rounds I think I would still trust the CZ. If limited to 10 rounds of FMJ I'm not so sure.

Mcbethr--valid points. I have no plans to run out and change platforms right now. In fact, a just put a pair of new grips on the cz75. So I'm in no rush. Just thinking ahead. Would you feel "under-gunned" with 10 rounds of 9mm FMJ? FreeJersey--the 97 was definitely my first thought. Only concern is that it apparently doesn't like HPs. Now obviously in the scenerio I set up the HPs aren't a possibility, and if they are I'm sticking with my current 9mm. But the fact that it is picky at all gives me pause. I also hear it's heavy. But I'd have to shoot one. A 1911 would be the most appealing. I love the look, the history, etc. It's just that they tend not to hold 10 rounds, feel a little small in the grip for my large hands, and have that reliability reputation.

I enjoy my 9mm. It's really the only non-.22 pistol caliber I've fired. I never bothered with the others because I worried that ammunition cost would negatively impact my range enjoyment. And I have no plans to start reloading. I've got enough hobbies. I don't really consider a firearm as part of my home protection plan. A big dog, alarm system, and telephone are enough to help me sleep at night. However... If new gun control measures were to restrict mags to 10 rounds, and in addition, should expanding bullet bans become law, does the 9mm still make sense as a home defense tool? And if not, what might replace my cz? I would want something that holds 10 rounds, is steel, is comparable to a full size 9mm in terms of recoil (if that's possible, never shot a .45), accepts nice wood grips, and is known for reliability. Obviously there are lemons in every model line. However, I get the sense that the 1911 platform is a bit more finicky than other modern designs. That's debatable I'm sure, but within reason it seems to be the rule. I'd be open to 357 revolver as a choice. Great grip options, steel, etc, and the ability to go between 38 and 357 for cost/power. But I like the ease of loading with a semi.

I was a little afraid I would get these responses. Hunting ethically is priority #1. But a few discussions with hunters recently led me to believe that the new copper plated buckshot in 3" shells was a better choice for sub 40yard hunting situations. Better meaning more likely to stop the deer in its tracks. So now I have $100 worth of different buckshot on the way to pattern the gun. Not that I mind spending the money for the right reasons, just don't want to waste money in the processes of landing on the best gear for the job. RE the hastings barrel, if I go slug I'm going to want a cantilevered barrel for a scope. But thanks!

Hey guys, I asked some hunters this question on another forum, but was hoping to get a range of opinions. This will be my first year out hunting (deer). Shotgun this time around. I was originally planning to get a cantilevered slug barrel because I was under the impression that slugs are more likely to yield a quick, ethical kill. I have since been told, however, that at close range in wooded NJ WMAs 3" copper plated buckshot is the better choice, esp since the deer will be moving during 6 day. Any thoughts on this? I bought some 3" 00 shells and plan to pattern various rounds and chokes at around 30 yards (my shoulder is not thrilled about the idea). Mistake?

Thanks guys! Technically they hunt deer at the camp. That said, I've never actually seen them bring home a deer. And I don't think I'll do any hunting this time around--just hang out and enjoy the company most of the time, maybe do some fishing. But I need state license. Later this season I'd like to hit a pheasant farm to see how I like it. So if I bring my own shotgun it would stay in the car most of the time?

I've been invited on a deer camp trip with the wife's family and need to get my first hunting license. It turns out there's an opening in two days for the education course/test, so I signed up. Doesn't give me a whole lot of time to study. So my questions: 1) Any reason to bring my own shotgun? I hear they provide them, and my case just tore and I don't really want to arrive with broken gear. 2) Any idea how they grade the test? Looking at the practice test, for example, should I be aiming for 100% correct? What does the rest of the day entail? Anything else I need to know or should be aware of? Thanks

That's probably the right kind of question to ask. From what I understand, the raw number was highest during the first 3 years of his presidency, not necessarily the ratio. However, that reflected increased border security--meaning that many people were "deported" after being caught crossing the border. There might have been a decrease in the number of resident immigrants deported during that time. However, the total number of people crossing the border has gone down substantially since 2008--which speaks directly to your question. But like most general trends (economy, immigration, crime), this is probably only tangentially related to actual federal policy.

I don't understand the point of this article. The Obama presidency has overseen more deportations than any other administration of the last 50 years. This is largely due to Bush era plans like Secure Communities (yes, a Bush policy), which the president has upheld. In fact, if anything he has increased pressure on the worst offenders in order to get them out of the country faster. If the point is to disapprove of presidents who don't deport enough, then this article should consider Obama the best president ever. If the point is to highlight failures of an already aggressive deportation policy, then it should at least mention the fact that, compared to every other presidency, Obama's has been the most deport-y.

I found the same thing up in North Jersey. Everyone said they're great guns, but they sit on the shelf. Gave me pause because I don't want a gun that depreciates because no one wants it. However, I bought one anyway and love it.

I voted Remington, but I know very little about the actual 1911 other than that it looks pretty terrific. I'm always a fan of US made when possible.

In Jersey City they had me sign a form to the effect that I wave my HIPPA rights. I checked "yes" to the therapy question--I saw a therapist a while back (wife had a health scare). I included a note explaining why, and a letter from the doctor stating that I have no mental health issues and nothing should prevent me from owning/operating firearms, along with his phone number. Gave it to the PD and they basically said all that info was probably unnecessary, but helpful. They never called the doctor.

As tempting as all this is, I think it would be cost prohibitive. Not only would I have to buy the tools, but also like 3 barrels to screw up while I practice.