mag1

Sucks, sorry to hear

All the time on Armslist?

Hard to find like the ammo is

How are the reloading supplies, still scarce? 45/9mm

$452 shipped.

Its been keeping me on my laptop more, and I am getting sick of it..My eyes are killing me. Went to Dicks in Manahawkin yesterday, and they have a sign on the counter saying out of ammo. Couldnt believe it. It definitely has stopped me from shooting weekly though. Are the reloading supplies still scarce for 45 and 9mm?

Thanks! I never really checked mine, but what is the inside of the safe door made of?

What happens when transporting a non NJ registered pistol to the range with a valid NJ FID?

I just got the email saying they processed my order. Figured it was gonna be backordered.

Thanks, ordered some for a friend

What could you use to store pistols on the inside of the door?

I turned down a SASS a month ago, wish I didnt for $2000

I stumbled over this read: http://www.leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/LAW/Documents/SummaryOfStateChildAccessPreventionLaws.pdf

Oh man, didnt see that, sorry guys

NJ Statute: 2C:58-15. Minor’s access to a loaded firearm; penalty, conditions. a. A person who knows or reasonably should know that a minor is likely to gain access to a loaded firearm at a premises under the person’s control commits a disorderly persons offense if a minor gains access to the firearm, unless the person: (1) Stores the firearm in a securely locked box or container; (2) Stores the firearm in a location which a reasonable person would believe to be secure; or (3) Secures the firearm with a trigger lock. b. This section shall not apply: (1) To activities authorized by section 14 of P.L.1979, c.179, (C.2C:58-6.1), concerning the lawful use of a firearm by a minor; or (2) Under circumstances where a minor obtained a firearm as a result of an unlawful entry by any person. c. As used in this act, “minor” means a person under the age of 16.

I am talking about in the In the home and unsupervised. My stuff is locked up and unloaded.

Saw this posted on Jerzeedevil.. Police Officer Survey on Gun Control Over 15,000 Officers took this survey, the response is surprising Government Officials... In March, PoliceOne conducted the most comprehensive survey ever of American law enforcement officers’ opinions on the topic gripping the nation's attention in recent weeks: gun control. More than 15,000 verified law enforcement professionals took part in the survey, which aimed to bring together the thoughts and opinions of the only professional group devoted to limiting and defeating gun violence as part of their sworn responsibility. Related Articles: Are legally-armed citizens the best solution to gun violence?Cops support simple, straightforward solutionsWhy a closed-minded approach won't work Related Resource: PoliceOne's 2013 Gun Policy & Law Enforcement Survey Results: Executive Summary Totaling just shy of 30 questions, the survey allowed officers across the United States to share their perspectives on issues spanning from gun control and gun violence to gun rights. Top Line Takeaways Breaking down the results, it's important to note that 70 percent of respondents are field-level law enforcers — those who are face-to-face in the fight against violent crime on a daily basis — not office-bound, non-sworn administrators or perpetually-campaigning elected officials. 1.) Virtually all respondents (95 percent) say that a federal ban on manufacture and sale of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds would not reduce violent crime. 2.) The majority of respondents — 71 percent — say a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of some semi-automatics would have no effect on reducing violent crime. However, more than 20 percent say any ban would actually have a negative effect on reducing violent crime. Just over 7 percent took the opposite stance, saying they believe a ban would have a moderate to significant effect. 3.) About 85 percent of officers say the passage of the White House’s currently proposed legislation would have a zero or negative effect on their safety, with just over 10 percent saying it would have a moderate or significantly positive effect. 4.) Seventy percent of respondents say they have a favorable or very favorable opinion of some law enforcement leaders’ public statements that they would not enforce more restrictive gun laws in their jurisdictions. Similarly, more than 61 percent said they would refuse to enforce such laws if they themselves were Chief or Sheriff. 5.) More than 28 percent of officers say having more permissive concealed carry policies for civilians would help most in preventing large scale shootings in public, followed by more aggressive institutionalization for mentally ill persons (about 19 percent) and more armed guards/paid security personnel (about 15 percent).See enlarged image 6.) The overwhelming majority (almost 90 percent) of officers believe that casualties would be decreased if armed citizens were present at the onset of an active-shooter incident. 7.) More than 80 percent of respondents support arming school teachers and administrators who willingly volunteer to train with firearms and carry one in the course of the job. 8.) More than four in five respondents (81 percent) say that gun-buyback programs are ineffective in reducing gun violence. 9.) More than half of respondents feel that increased punishment for obviously illegal gun sales could have a positive impact on reducing gun violence. http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/gun-surveyq8-1.gif 10.) When asked whether citizens should be required to complete a safety training class before being allowed to buy a gun, about 43 percent of officers say it should not be required. About 42 percent say it should be required for all weapons, with the remainder favoring training classes for certain weapons. http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/gun-surveyQ9.gif 11.) While some officers say gun violence in the United States stems from violent movies and video games (14 percent), early release and short sentencing for violent offenders (14 percent) and poor identification/treatments of mentally-ill individuals (10 percent), the majority (38 percent) blame a decline in parenting and family values. http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/gun-surveyQ29.gif Bottom Line Conclusions Quite clearly, the majority of officers polled oppose the theories brought forth by gun-control advocates who claim that proposed restrictions on weapon capabilities and production would reduce crime. In fact, many officers responding to this survey seem to feel that those controls will negatively affect their ability to fight violent criminals. Contrary to what the mainstream media and certain politicians would have us believe, police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility. The officers patrolling America’s streets have a deeply-vested interest — and perhaps the most relevant interest — in making sure that decisions related to controlling, monitoring, restricting, as well as supporting and/or prohibiting an armed populace are wise and effective. With this survey, their voice has been heard.

I know the law states that minors can not gain access to a loaded firearm. 1. What if the firearm isn't loaded? I can remember when I was in 7th grade, my friends father had a collectible lever action in an open glass case on the wall. We were told not to touch it, not becuase is was loaded, but because he did not want marks on it. We were able to handle it when he was home. I never touched it when he wasnt home, but I did want to. My friend was deathly scared to touch it also, and didnt as far as I know. We all had access to it, and from what I remember, there was no ammo in the house. The guy never hunted and for all that I know just had this one rifle that was passed down to him. 2. Can you have a locked safe in your house that a minor can not open, but he/she knows where it is and can have access to? Such as in a living room?

No way, but thanks for the heads up

I like the versatility also. I cant take away from my SCAR fund. I think that is taking me away from the 901. Thanks for the clarification before I bought another 5.56 that I dont need

Not into the Colt, so just looking at the MP-10 for now.

Realized that about 30 min ago after a back and forth email. I was trying to get the Colt a couple days ago, and just confused the 2. Gonna check out the 901 now, but dont have access to one and bet its gonna be pricey

Yep they are..They are just new so I can find decent reviews.

I have decided to go the semi .308 route. I have the opportunity to buy either rifle new. The Colt is $200 less. They will be NJ compliant. I want both, but need funds for other toys. Anyone have either one, and opinions? Edit: The colt is 5.56. Got caught up in all the craziness. So just looking at the MP-10 now.