Kachalsky v Cacace

[222 3]

SCOTUS can decide as early as next Monday whether they will include this case in their next year's docket.

 

 

Case concerns NY CCW, which is shall issue, but has 'proper cause' which basically means you need to have survived a violent crime to qualify.

 

Ramifications would, of course, include NJ CCW.

 

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/kachalsky-v-cacace/

[222 3]

SCOTUS denied review.

 

Not really surprising: often SCOTUS will stay out of issues which are actively being debated. They prefer to let the federal and state legislatures settle down before they jump in.

 

www.scotusblog.com/2013/04/court-avoids-gun-rights-dispute/#more-162369

[reloaderguy 30]

Yup. As had been said before. CCW will never happen in NJ!

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-15/new-york-gun-limits-intact-as-high-court-rejects-appeal.html