Shooting and Outdoors
Forums
-
- 93,934
- posts
-
- 16,869
- posts
-
- 28,852
- posts
-
- 35,808
- posts
-
- 4,930
- posts
-
- 23,978
- posts
-
- 9,409
- posts
-
- 3,661
- posts
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Topics
-
-
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Posts
-
By Malice4you · Posted
Seeing how they want you to provide proof your gun is yours for a NJ carry permit, there's one. And I just read about one of the other dumbass states, I believe Illinois or Cali, recently tried to pass some BS requiring proof of ownership (prior to enactment of said BS) within 4 days, or they could sieze and/or destroy the gun(s). I don't recall specifics, but found the link somewhere on this forum. -
Plenty of people think the government shouldn't be requiring it. However, you won't find many arguing against having, and maintaining, a high level of proficiency with the weapon you'll be carrying. -
By Frank Thomas · Posted
In the Army, the distance to qualify with a M16 rifle was about 100 meters vs only 25 or 30m for a 9mm weapon. Why? Because the smaller the gun, the harder it is to hit a target. In any event, I'm going to try qualifying with both weapons and will probably only qualify with the Taurus .38 revolver. I also think this requirement is Unconstitutional and will eventually be ruled as such -
By Displaced Texan · Posted
The shape could, but not sure about the material being flexible and resilient enough. -
By Displaced Texan · Posted
That would be a shame if it didn’t.
-
-
