• Announcements

    • Maksim

      NJGF's Gun Range & Store Database   05/23/2017

      Excited about launching a new feature, our very own member- driven range and store database.  Read the announcement and watch the video here... www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/86658-njgfs-gun-store-range-database/


Premier Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Feedback


capt14k last won the day on February 26

capt14k had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

360 Excellent

1 Follower

About capt14k

  • Rank
    NJGF Regular
  • Birthday 11/07/1976

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location:
  • Interests
    WWI-Korea MIlitary Rifles
  • Home Range

Recent Profile Visitors

579 profile views
  1. https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&hl=en-us&ei=slJxWaqMEMP1-AH345WYAw&q=disciplinary+actions+against+officer+noor&oq=disciplinary+actions+against+officer+noor&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.3..33i160k1l2.5673.7298.0.7890. Take your pick. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  2. Use Google douchebag. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  3. Since that article claimed to be setting the facts straight why was there no mention of the 3 complaints filed against Noor, 2 from 2017 that are open, or the pending lawsuit he is party to. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  4. @Nickjc your right on both counts. The useless posts have become more and more frequent. Making sifting through the forum unbearable, even when using the block feature. The only real chance NJ has is SCOTUS and that is what the election of 2016 was about. Once Kennedy retires and God willing Ginsburg is gone I believe the right 2A case will be correctly decided. This will then end state infringements on 2A. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  5. Damn Tapatalk I noticed suddenly isn't quoting in replies. Anyone else have this problem and if so is there a workaround. It's only happening on this forum. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  6. Those possible underlying motives are for 1st Amendment Lounge. Look into his background a little closer. Not saying it is the case but the possibility is there. I honestly wasn't looking to debate this shooting when I started the thread I just wanted an answer on newer dashcam technology and how they work. I guess the answer is there are many systems. That work many different ways. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  7. @High Exposure that is the issue, the courts have allowed use of force in far too many cases where we did have the facts, and no it was not justified IMO, but legally it was determined it was. Just because an officer perceives a threat does not necessarily give them the right to use force. I know many older and retired LEO's who agree with me. Especially cases where someone had a knife and multiple cops emptied their magazines into the suspect and the shooting was ruled justified use of force. I have the utmost respect for law enforcement. It is a dangerous job, but is was a chosen profession. I feel there should be a higher standard for police use of deadly force not lower. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  8. Maybe your right@Zeke. I guess this case especially sickens me due to other possible underlying motives. Which may not be the case at all. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  9. Because there has been no statement to the contrary and the shooter is refusing to speak to investigators or make a statement. Because there is no video or audio. Because an innocent woman who made the 911 phone call is dead. Because the police have released a statement that no weapon was found at the scene. Because I fear that somehow someway this will again be determined to be a justified shooting. Hearing a bang and someone running up to the car is not justified. Yes I understand the legal standpoint and strategy in not speaking. However if this was such a just action what is there to hide? Unfortunately the concept of protect and serve is dead. The courts have even ruled that police don't have a duty to protect and serve. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  10. Bodycams not turned on. Policy there is to turn on if safe before using force according to media outlets. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  11. He heard a noise and shot through the vehicle at an unarmed woman who was approaching the vehicle. If this isn't a bad shooting there is no such thing as a bad shooting. If you're too afraid to do your job you shouldn't be doing it. Police can not be allowed to shoot someone because they heard a loud bang and saw someone approaching. This was the woman who called 911. Not a chance I would ever call 911. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  12. Here is the police dispatch recordings. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  13. So the cameras don't necessarily automatically record when vehicle is turned on? If it was recording it would have picked up the audio. Is that correct? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  14. I know we have a few LEOS on the forum. Curious as to their responses. I was told more than once that the Dashcam automatically records once the key is in the ignition and continues recording for a period of time after the key is removed. Is this not normal practice? Keeping in mind Minneapolis just upgraded their dashcams and added bodycams to officers so they would have the latest technology. Yet nothing was recorded of a shooting of an innocent woman who called 911. Who was shot by the passenger while conversing with the partner who was in the driver's seat. So the passenger shot across his partner. Yet no video and no audio. http://pamelageller.com/2017/0...lvr.it&utm_medium=facebook Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
  15. True and the NRA has hung us out to dry but S&W39 said they have little influence in anti states. On a national level they are the only group getting things done when it comes to 2A. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk