Peter Goldwing

Well.... If true what he did, he does not have the right to have, carry a gun. A guy that steals is not an honorable citizen

Here we go again. Another free state https://www.foxnews.com/us/permitless-gun-carry-oklahoma

Apparently you can have any ethnic organization as long as is not white or FBI will pay you a visit

It sounds racist, right? The media has double standards for a long time. And of course they had to drag Trumps name in there. For video google CBS NAAGA https://www.npr.org/2019/07/10/738493491/with-a-growing-membership-since-trump-black-gun-group-considers-getting-politica

Apparently not so. Although making less restrictive gun-laws in other state might have different results. The conclusion is that Its not the guns, its the people the determining factor in crime rate http://maineexaminer.com/maine-tops-safest-states-rankings-four-years-after-relaxing-key-gun-law/

As I said it many times is warmer in NJ than here in Edgewater FL. We had 89 F today Tomorrow the same. Never had a problem with the electricity since the grid was designed to run at 100% A/C load

Some more https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/new-jersey-residents-flee-millionaires-tax

I like many others feels so https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/california-new-york-and-new-jersey-are-now-socialist-states-piscopo

HR38 passed the house and went nowhere. Trump will veto it or will try to work a deal for national carry

why would you kill an animal that you really cannot use for any goods. My neighbor got mad cow disease from eating one long ago. Same goes for pigeon shoot.

South Dakota has passed the Constitutional Cary into law https://www.nraila.org/articles/20190131/governor-noem-signs-nra-backed-constitutional-carry-bill

Darn it, time flies by quickly. Seems like it just happened last year

So I guess a judge will drop a shooters charge of "attempted murder" of a cop if his lawyer states that he didn't want to kill the cop, just wanted to prevent the cop from apprehending him. We didnt want to kill the Germans, just tried to stop them taking over the world. See the idiocy? Whats more idiotic about this is the High Exposure will aim at head and chest as I do. But I want to kill while he wants to stop the threat. BS describes it.Same very action different wording. And if the guy still moves he deems the threat wasn't stopped and puts another bullet in the guys head. Nuff said.

As I said before, just word play. Putting an animal "to sleep" or "euthanizing" it is just another word for killing it. But it sounds nicer. Stoping the threat is nicer but you aim to kill. Maybe after the guy being shot in the leg or arm decides to put his hands up and THEN you stop shooting. But things happen very fast in close shooting quarters and you dont have the luxury to analyze the situation during the incident. Yep we shoot to stop the threat by aiming at chest, head and put sufficient lead out till the guy drops. Happy now? And that was my last comment on the subject. It getting boring.

It is political now. Dont use the word "kill "but "stop"instead and you'll be fine. Ill be happy to admit to my being wrong if I was, but as you could see by other posters Im not. Cops dont aim for legs unless that all thats visible. Its fine with me :be the "good guy with a gun"