NJGF Shopping Partners
Please visit our supporting sponsors. NJGF receives a small percentage of each sale any time you shop through the banners/links in the posts.
14 topics in this forum
-
- 35 replies
- 74,923 views
-
- 1 reply
- 9,759 views
-
- 28 replies
- 10,746 views
-
- 11 replies
- 3,804 views
-
- 29 replies
- 5,026 views
-
- 1 reply
- 3,085 views
-
- 0 replies
- 6,126 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2,206 views
-
- 3 replies
- 2,801 views
-
- 2 replies
- 3,288 views
-
- 3 replies
- 3,088 views
-
- 5 replies
- 2,035 views
-
- 1 reply
- 3,009 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2,285 views
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Topics
-
-
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Posts
-
FPC has already filed a lawsuit. https://www.firearmspolicy.org/mock -
Yes I understand that & will obviously abide by it. I am not stupid. I mentioned with the lawsuits going around there was a stipulation that as long as your qualified to carry you shouldn’t be restricted to 1 gun. I will let everything play out & see what happens down the road. It seems each county is making up their own rules which is unconstitutional as per 2nd amendment. im not even going to ask about qualifying with another gun and having it put on my permit yet. They have an attitude when you speak with them. They act like they’re doing you a favor. I have a Glock 26 which is great. It’s just the point I brought up about the restriction placed on my permit when an adjoining county gives no restrictions. It’s all good!!! -
By Cheflife15 · Posted
Unfortunately, Lots of things are unconstitutional. With that said, respectfully, I'm happier knowing a guy who can't hit a target more than a couple feet away isn't blasting away next to my wife and kid. Part of being a responsible gun owner is knowing how to handle the gun you carry. There is nothing keeping you from shooting the current gun you have with better profiency. Dry fire, take a class, practice. That should be your focus. -
By Frank Thomas · Posted
Under Bruen, the US Supreme Court ruled any gun law has to be ". . . consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation." Being an expert shooter with a tiny handgun or requiring liability insurance or banning carry in your car or at the public park, all may have some benefit, but all have no "historical tradition." So unless the Supreme Court reads " high level of proficiency," in the 2nd Amendment, it's really unconstitutional to require such a test, imho. It's a good idea to shoot accurately. But it's not Constitutional and will be rejected by the US Supreme Court at some point, imho -
By Malice4you · Posted
Seeing how they want you to provide proof your gun is yours for a NJ carry permit, there's one. And I just read about one of the other dumbass states, I believe Illinois or Cali, recently tried to pass some BS requiring proof of ownership (prior to enactment of said BS) within 4 days, or they could sieze and/or destroy the gun(s). I don't recall specifics, but found the link somewhere on this forum.
-
-
