Jump to content
82ndAbnRVN

An Initiative Model for NJ?

Recommended Posts

Recieved the following from a knowledgeable NYPD friend.

 

There is a Federal Law (42 U.S.C. § 1983), commonly referred to as "section 1983".

 

The law provides for penalties for violations of an individuals Civil Rights granted in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution under the cloak of State Government.

 

With this law there are:

  • Criminal penalties
  • Civil penalties
  • Punitive penalties
  • The NYS Senate and Assembly from a layman's view has violated:
    • The 2nd Amendment Right to Keep And Bear Arms
    • The 4th Amendment "Confiscation", turn in magazines and certain weapons, the right to be safe in your home property and papers, no property to be seized without a Warrant based on "Probable Cause"
    • The 5th Amendment forced to tell government you own a firearm made illegal after the fact "An ex post facto law" you are now forced to incriminate yourself, what about the protection to not self incriminate oneself
    • The 14th Amendment the right to "Due Process" the State of New York unilaterally passed a law, in violation of the Bill of Rights could have been put to a public vote or referendum

The Governor, each State Senator and Assembly person voting for or signing should be sued and all remedies sought, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

 

http://www.constitution.org/brief/forsythe_42-1983.htm

 

Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunction relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

 

THE ACTION SHOULD BE FILED IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - HOPEFULLY A FIREARM FRIENDLY VENUE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That 'sounds' well and good...

 

But this is prolly what NY will read from it:

 

"Heller vs. DC says that 'we' the states are "allowed" certain restrictions with accord to firearms. Pls go ahead and sue us you radical right wing gun fanatics. We will win in our respective Fed Circuit Courts, because we already know the law better than you tards. Plus we know all the judges REALLY well. Oh, and by the way your all douchb@ggs......"

 

"P.S. Spin the wheel again MORONS!!!!! Hahahahah...." -From Your Dearest Most Worshipfulness and Progressive Example Setter Governor, CUOMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...