RubberBullets

Shitbag deserves every bufu he receives in jail. Just wish he would have tried to resist in camden when they caught him.

Welcome! and Nonsense.. start with the .44 magnum.. its like hugging a puppy when you squeeze the trigger =)

old people.. they do the cutest things sometimes...

Hello... from the not so distant jersey in-land =)

lol Dont forget the everlasting self reloading handguns that fire 30+1 with a standard mag.

Damn.. called and these guys said there was no sale so i thought i missed out. Maybe ill get my hands on a few boxes today before its too late

gud damn hand cannon.. looks great!

lol not really, but its not a SD knife.. It was more to have a straight blade that is accessible. Folders get lost in pockets and with turnout gloves it would be impossible to get to in a pinch. (Like if rope needs to get cut asap)

Making Gunny proud! -not my video- = )

Unknown brand name. Strapped it to my light on duty because there's nowhere else to fit it ; ) A suitable knife until it's time to replace it with a 1259 short k-bar.

Got this spreading like wildfire over my fb friends on reshares..

No weapon = no reason. There better be more to this story or that officer should be in jail.

http://www.ammoland...._medium=twitter Manasquan, NJ --(Ammoland.com)- Philadelphia area resident Mark Fiorino has filed a Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit against the City of Philadelphia and its Police Department over an incident that occurred almost exactly a year ago. Its February 13th 2011 and the Delaware Valley resident is in Philadelphia visiting a relative. While in the area he took advantage of the unseasonably warm weather to walk to a local Auto Parts store to pick something up. It was during this walk that Fiorino was attacked and held at gun point. Not by one of the all to numerous criminal thugs that roam the streets of Philadelphia preying on its residents, but by thugs with badges, representing the City of Brotherly Love. You see, Fiorino openly carries his handgun, a practice that is completely legal inside the City if one holds a License To Carry Firearms, and legal everywhere else in the State of Pennsylvania without the need to have an LTCF if the party is on foot. But there is a problem, the leadership in City Hall and the Police Department don’t like the practice and have a long and well documented history of making every aspect of a Citizen practicing his or her Second Amendment Rights as difficult and onerous as possible. During his trek to the store, a Philadelphia Police Sgt passed by, observed Fiorino’s safely holstered firearm on his hip, and with no indication that any type of criminal activity was actually afoot, immediately stopped his cruiser and confronted Mr Fiorino at gun point. (more on this story and video here) Fiorino stayed remarkably calm and fully compliant with the Sgt, including offering numerous times to show the Officer his License to Carry and even referencing a recently released directive from the Philadelphia Police that advised Officers that the practice Fiorino was engaged in was legal and did not amount to a crime. But Sergeant Dougherty was having none of it. Instead of attempting to de escalate the situation by actually listening to what a compliant Citizen was trying to tell him, Dougherty doubled down, continuing to hold Fiorino at gun point, while radioing for back up Officer’s, who, once on scene forced Fiorino to the ground violently and cuffing his hands behind his back. Sgt Dougherty and the responding Officers discovered during a pat down search Mr Fiorino was carrying a pocket digital recorder and had captured the entire encounter on it, enraging them further. One Officer can even be heard attempting to destroy the device, which would of course destroy any evidence of their behavior. This despite the fact that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has previously ruled that even though Pennsylvania is considered a ” two party ” State as the law pertains to recording people, meaning both parties must be aware of and consent to the recording of their conversation in order to avoid violation of the State’s Wire Tapping Law, Police Officers in the performance of their duties in public have no such expectation of privacy and recording them in such settings is perfectly legally. Sadly, their attempts to destroy evidence of their illegal behavior is not without precedent. Recall the group of undercover Narcotics Officers that were caught in 2009 shaking down and stealing from a local bodega owner. The Officers involved in that incident were caught on tape, by a hidden camera they didn’t find, confiscating the video tapes from the stores security camera’s, which captured evidence of their crimes against those they had sworn an oath to protect. Fiorino sat in the back of a paddy wagon for approximately forty five minutes while Officers made numerous phone calls to supervisors and the District Attorney’s Office, until they confirmed what Fiorino had been telling them all along was correct. Openly carrying a firearm, with no other observed behavior to indicate a crime was in progress or about to take place was no violation of the law. Fiorino was released from the scene, with his sidearm, with not even the threat of potential charges for any act at a later date, and not even so much as an apology from the Officers for their treatment of the him. In March 2011, Fiorino published the audio recording of his encounter to Youtube and a local Firearms Rights website, The Pennsylvania Firearms Owners Association, as a warning of sorts to other Citizens of what they should expect to experience at the hands of Philadelphia Police Officers if they choose to exercise their rights in a lawful manner, but one that the powers that be don’t personally approve of. The recording rapidly went viral, garnering attention and commentary from across the Country. Fast forward to April 2011. After certain Philadelphia Police became aware of the enormous amount of attention Mr Fiorino’s recordings were garnering on the internet and in other media formats, a decision was made to charge Mr Fiorino with several minor criminal charges. Not because there was actual evidence to support said charges, but clearly as a retaliatory move on the part of the Command structure within the Philadelphia Police because of their embarrassment over the recordings and in a deliberate effort to both punish Mr Fiorino for exercising his rights and to discourage any future efforts by Mr Fiorino or any other Citizens from revealing the blatantly abusive and Un Constitutional practices indoctrinated within the ranks of the Philadelphia Police Dept. On October 27th, 2011. Mr Fiorino’s criminal case was heard before the Court of Common Pleas and he was exonerated of all charges by the Judge. Now today, almost a year to the day from when this completely unnecessary incident occurred, Mr Fiorino, with the assistance of the ACLU has filed a Federal Civil Rights Suit against the City of Philadelphia, The Philadelphia Police Dept and the individual Officers involved for their egregious and unwarranted violations of his 1st, and 4th Amendment Rights. After reviewing the complaint, listed here http://tiny.cc/ahrk1, from a legal perspective, the City and Police Dept don’t have a leg to stand on in defending their actions and overt disregard for the rights of Citizens. All indications suggest, Mr Fiorino will not entertain settlement offers, and in fact is not necessarily motivated by any potential monetary settlement, but more out of a desire to compel the City of Philadelphia and The Police Dept and its Officers to do what they should have been doing all along. Respecting the rights of the Citizens they serve, including the right to lawfully carry a firearm for self defense instead of regurgitating the Anti Gun dogma that passes for sound policy decisions. One way or the other, this suit will cost the City and its leaders. In financial terms, and certainly in stature and any modicum of respect, and despite their best efforts at character assassination of Mr Fiorino and other Citizens, they have no one to blame but themselves. Hopefully the voters in the City will wise up and start electing leaders that actually practice what they preach, the respect and protection of all people’s rights, even those they don’t agree with.

Agreed with above, but rather then framing out a room itself.. this may be one of those opportunities to fabricate a little hiding place in plain sight. i.e. incorporated into shelving or a workbench with a quick removable face plate.

Wonder what the difference between S104 and S269 are?

yes PLEASE STOP SIGNING THE CCW PETITION AS LINKED... The bill that it represents this year is for driving while texting. The petition is 2 yrs old now. The new bill numbers are listed above and no Petition has been set up for it. An online petition is great.. and can bolster support, but a phone call to your representative removes anonymity and puts a valid threat towards losing votes in that particular legislators district.

Yes, thats the Bill as proposed. the contact info for your representatives is what the OP is for. Thanks for posting the bill for everyone to read.

*Granted* Please feel free to distribute to any medium that will spread the word of a bill proposed to further our 2A rights. Also, Would a Moderator be able to remove http://njgunforums.c...j-ccw-petition/ as people are just signing it in all probability of not realizing that bill is renumbered. Thanks.

The link in the OP takes you to the NJ State Legislative website. On the left side navigation bar under "Members", the first link is "Find Your Legislator" 3/4 the way down on the extreme right of the page says "Search By" and I chose "Municipality" to narrow my search. from there it brings up your legislators by district.

DEA one never gets old.. on a side note.. I didnt know Mekhi Phiefer was a DEA Agent? http://l.yimg.com/eb/ymv/us/img/hv/photo/movie_pix/universal_pictures/8_mile/mekhi_phifer/8mile.jpg

Id take the unicorn AR over this..

A-1493 for the Assembly and S-104 for the Senate to propose revisions to securing a permit to carry a handgun for the 2012-2013 Session. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bills/bills0001.asp Since the link is FUBAR. Click the link, hit "Bills 2011-2013, then search by keyword... Bill A1493 is the reintroduction of the proposed bill A-1384 and S-69 A1493 Revises procedures for securing a permit to carry a handgun. Law and Public Safety S104 Is the Senate Version of the bill Last Session Bill Number: S69 Carroll, Michael Patrick S69 Carroll, Michael Patrick as Primary Sponsor DiMaio, John as Primary Sponsor McHose, Alison Littell as Primary Sponsor Chiusano, Gary R. as Co-Sponsor Bucco, Anthony M. as Co-Sponsor Rumana, Scott T. as Co-Sponsor It was introduced under a new number this year 1/10/2012 and referred the Law and Public Safety Committee. I am unaware of any petitions going around, but ther should be some type of joint venture to attempt to express our voices to the legislature. As for the bill, it is the same bill as proposed in the previous S.69. And for those that live in District 10 ( you can search your representatives on the sidebar to the left) For those living in: Bay Head, Brick, Island Heights,Lakehurst, Lavallette, Manchester, Mantoloking, Point Pleasant Beach, Seaside Heights,Toms River Republican Senator James W. Holzapfel happens to sit on the Law and Public Safety Committee charged with reviewing this bill. I would at least like to see a valiant effort by those in the area to call his offices and state your stance on S-104 Republican Assemblyman Gregory P. McGuckin is also on the assembly's Law and Public Safety Committee and represents District 10 and shares the same office with the Senator above. .....A-1493 852 Highway 70, Brick, NJ 08724 Phone: (732) 840-9028