Jump to content
deadeye74

PA Gun Classification

Recommended Posts

I know this is the NJ gun forum, but found Myself in an interesting conversation with a friend from PA.

 

According to my friend, PA state law considers a gun a "firearm" if it has a 16" or shorter barrel. I asked what they considered something with a barrel longer to be, and he did not know.

 

Anyone here know the answer to this? I scratched my head since I was under the impression the term firearm was used to refer to any gun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http:// http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/13/uniform-firearms-act-oddities/

 

Your friends info seems accurate. I guess anything > 16" is considered a "long gun"

 

We came to the same conclusion but were both under the impression a "firearm" was a term used for any "gun" that fired a projectile by use of a primer and powder. Thanks for the link.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, in the uniform firearms act, there are several definitions of "firearm" in different sections of the law.

In one section it's

"Firearm." Any weapon which is designed to or may readily be converted to expel any projectile by the action of an explosive, or the frame or receiver of any such weapon.

 

Under the main heading of ss6102 it's

"Firearm." Any pistol or revolver with a barrel length less than 15 inches, any shotgun with a barrel length less than 18 inches or any rifle with a barrel length less than 16 inches, or any pistol, revolver, rifle or shotgun with an overall length of less than 26 inches. The barrel length of a firearm shall be determined by measuring from the muzzle of the barrel to the face of the closed action, bolt or cylinder, whichever is applicable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • First to post I’ll take “item” gets first dibs. Located in Lakewood Area, Ocean County for meetups. All firearms must go through an FFL. I just took a few big pictures cause it’s a lot so feel free to message me about specifics: Left to Right: Daniel Defense M4A1 SOCOM FDE 14.5” Barrel w/ Surefire CTN Warcomp, Geissele SSA-E Trigger, Daniel Defense Iron Sights, Magpul Bad Lever. Approx 400-500 rounds. Upper only sale is possible also. Zastava ZPAP M70- QD optic mount, Single point Sling, 5x10/30 Zastava Steel Magazines, 1x10/30 PMAG. Has never been shot since I purchased new. Troy A4 Other- Ballistic Advantage Hanson Profile Barrel 11.3”, Silencerco ASR Muzzlebrake, SDTA ASR Blast Shield, Magpul BUIS. 40 rounds for barrel break in. Modmat Wartime 300 Blackout Other- 100% Stock in original box. Hiperfire Trigger, SNCH Charging Handle, BCM Furniture. Unfortunately hasn’t been shot since I purchased new. Upper only sale possible. Majority of this stuff is either new or like new. Like I said feel free to message me with specifics. I will try to update with a list when I have more time.   To be continued: Will post list and ammo.
    • You’re right.  It’s totally the pedestrians fault for being pedestrians on a pedestrian-only road.  They definitely should have moved to the gravel so that the illegally-driven ATV could safely illegally drive.      The reason there was no time to stop is because of the speed of the illegally driven ATV.     The legally walking pedestrians were in less danger with the mass of the car in between them and the illegally driven ATV.     Sure, he could have set up further back but then the pedestrians would not have been behind him.  Hard to protect pedestrians from the ATV when they’re both in front of you.    And how do you know his emergency lights were off?
    • It's physically a 2 lane road where there was plenty of room to avoid the pedestrians. Including the "parent and child" that were literally on the roads edge. The camera is a fisheye, and the ATV was much closer than it looked coming around the curve and there was no time to stop. The cop caused the crash and injury while further endangering pedestrians. This could have been handled differently, without injury. E.g. He could have set up further back and turned his lights and sirens on and gave the ATV time to stop. Again, illegally riding an ATV is a fineable offense, that's it. Does not justify lethal force by auto.  I hope he sues and wins. 
    • It's not really a road. It's supposed to just be open to pedestrian traffic. "Farnum Drive has been open to just pedestrian traffic since 2020. A large number of people, including families with children, were in the area." Voy beat me to it.
    • Thanks for this.  It wasn’t clear from the video that it is a pedestrian path.  It looked like a dual use back road.   It wasn’t a street.  It is a paved pedestrian path.  There is no expectation by those using it of any vehicles. What would a cop be expected to do if a dirt bike was careening down a busy sidewalk in the city?   Second, the police car had stopped.  Any force in this equation LITERALLY came from the ATV.  
×
×
  • Create New...