Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MPA

Armalite a10 ejection prob

Recommended Posts

It seems to shoot hornady otm well. And i tried some hornady tactical application police 155 and 168. It all worked fine. It prob is ammo. Next time im at range l try a little of each alternating and see what happens. Thanks. As far as buffer its a 1 year old factory gun. Omly about 150? Rds through. Mechanical would suprise me. Like a new gun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like the ammo to me but I didnt want to skip over other possibilities. But since other types work fine, it implies it is the ammo and enhances my theory of over gassing. The reaon I ask about the rifle is because sometimes an overgassing condition can be aided by a heavier buffer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So i went to range. Hornady otm runs good. Hornady TAP lo ammo works good. 308 corelokt. Good. 7.62 winchester good.

7.62 magtech. That cdc or whatever in 50 rd box. NOT GOOD.

And lake city m118lr. Not good.

Both magtech and m118 lr stick on ejection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Ignoring the Duty To Inform, this is definately going to be used against us CCW holders during the current court hearings.  Drinking and randomly shooting a gun out the window does not paint a good picture for CCW holders.   
    • Getting a non-threaded barrel is easy.  I'd definitely consider it as having a form of a shroud for #3.  The question is does it actually violate #1?  If so is there another chassis option that does not have mag holder VFG?    
    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
×
×
  • Create New...