Jump to content
jto966

? Winchester 30-30

Recommended Posts

I can't see your attachments. 

 

I have seen mint condition Win94's from the mid 1960's go for $1,000 and higher. 

Are you looking for a collector's piece or a shooter?  If you are looking for a shooter, there is no reason to pay more than $600 for an excellent condition Win94 with a couple of love marks on it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both sellers are looking for about $450 - $500.  Just not sure if anything changed from the 60's to the 80's.

Not sure why the attachments are not working.  I'm going to look at the one made in the mid 80's tomorrow.

 

Edit:  I believe they were shooters but not very often.. definitely not show pieces 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not expect to see a huge difference in function.  As a rule, the newer the mfg date the lower the material quality, but both rifles were made before the Winchester quality collapse in the 1990s. 

 

Those prices sound very fair for excellent-to-mint condition.  If it were not for the fact that I am still on probation with my wife from my buying binge last winter, I would be seriously tempted to add another Model 1894 to my collection. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are pre-64 forged & milled parts Winchester's, post-64 Winchester's, 70-'s era Winchester's, cross-bolt safety Winchester's, AngleEject (AE) Winchester's and Japanese Winchester's. Hence the reason for why prices are all over the place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tks junkmanted

 

Parker, if the mfg year was what I said above 66/67 or 89 (just confirmed) is one more desirable than the other?

I'm trying to research but a lot of info to consume

How does one choose?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pick the one YOU like the best. They both look like good shooters. Winchester purists frowned on the early post-64 guns, some said metal was poorly done, wouldn't hold a good blue, stamped parts, poor fit and finish, "blah" wood, etc. Winchester "got it" after that and the 80's guns were a little better received.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are buying them to shoot, you will not see much of a functional difference.  They both appear to be 90-to-95%.  Everything else being equal, I would go with '89. 

 

I'll second what Parker said about holding the blue.  I bought and refinished a '73 about 3 years ago.  The bluing is already starting to fade.  But it is not worth the cost to have it stripped and hot blued.  It's a shooter, so I just shoot it.  The kids love it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went to look at the Winchester today. You would almost think it was brand new. The "only" pitting it you would even call it that was on the lever. The stock and rest of the rifle was like new "mirror finish.

$400 oh and the serial number began with 34 which means 1966 right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went to look at the Winchester today. You would almost think it was brand new. The "only" pitting it you would even call it that was on the lever. The stock and rest of the rifle was like new "mirror finish.

$400 oh and the serial number began with 34 which means 1966 right?

 

There is a website that will tell you the month and year it was manufactured.  Google it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Parker I ended up finding the same site the only problem is I only recall the first two numbers of the serial. My understanding is you need the full number to get the accurate model year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Parker I ended up finding the same site the only problem is I only recall the first two numbers of the serial. My understanding is you need the full number to get the accurate model year.

 

Anything that starts with "44" is a 1976 or 1977 build. It's not a "1966" as the seller claims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking to pick up a Kriss vector  in 9mm.  Let me know what you got.   Thanks Chris  
    • If you’re going to VA, buy 2 radios.  Program one for here and one for there.  If you guys are buying Baofeng radios do yourself a favor and get a tactical antenna for it,it’ll extend your reach.
    • Both our memories are a bit lacking. 3 bystanders were hit by NYPD bullets and 6 were hit by fragments at the Empire State Building shooting. The bullets later were determined to have passed through the bad guy as I said. He was not a big guy. The police fired 16 rds and 7 hit the bad guy.  Spray and pray?  I think not.  These officers fired until the threat was stopped and everyone is moving. Have you ever tried to hit a moving target whilst you're moving.  If you watch the video from where the police encounter him, the BG draws his gun from his bag, NYPD guys shoot, and the BG hit the ground is about 2 or 3 seconds.  The closest officer is maybe 12 feet or less.  The closest cover are those concrete flower pots.  If the officers chose to take cover before drawing the BG would have had a chance to shoot at least one officer. Know your target and beyond?  Agree 100%.  However, this by the Empire State Building at 9 am during the week.  There are bystanders and traffic in every direction.  The officers had a choice of doing what they did or letting the BG shoot them with his 1911 and shoot someone else. I think they made the right choice and the same one I would have made.  The officers exercised the best option in protecting themselves and the public. The first video is the police shooting.  The second is more detailed and gives you a lot of background information on the shooter. One thing this shows is if NYPD had to use fmj undoubtedly more bystanders would have been wounded perhaps killed.  NJ's hollowpoint law. only creates more danger to the public.    
×
×
  • Create New...