JackDaWack

The buck mark is also about $100 cheaper. It's not that i'm worried about saving money, just getting as much i can for what i spend. However, it does come with only one mag and if i wanted to throw a sight/scope on it i would have to buy the rail for it. The ruger comes with 2 mags and the weaver style rail if you want to mount it. I'll probably never mount a scope or it, this is more for practicing quick target acquisition( getting on target quick, getting off the rounds and moving to the next one)at short range. Honestly i'll probably end up owning both of these by the end of next year lol. If it weren't for those silver grips on the ruger i would buy the buck mark. Also the price request is still down, i'd like to see what shops in the area could do.

I've been reading a lot about the breakdown and re-assembly being a pain, thats not really a concern because like any firearm, u have to learn its in and outs, once u know how to do it like u said it becomes easy. Im very patient with building stuff, and i enjoy a challenge anyway. The rugers look sleeker too in my opinion, very sharp!

Im torn up right now between getting a ruger and buck mark, but ill be a little more specific. I really like the buck mark practical URX, but i really like the ruger MKIII(specifically one of the dealer exclusives. What do u guys think? OR Believe it or not but i have absolutely narrowed down my decision to these two pistols, i will be buying/ordering one of them on monday since my permits run out at the end of january.

Unfortunately, it is written where a judge may apply restrictions to the permit. This could potentially be any restriction he feels is necessary, in order to get rid of that it may be necessary to implement standard restrictions, it would be nice not to have any of course.

You need to take that course for hunting i believe, they offer them online too. FID just requires paperwork. I think a course is a good idea too, not totally for it, but u can def. reason if you plan on having a gun to defend yourself, you should at least know how to actually defend yourself.

It's all good man, the laws are confusing enough. I agree with what your saying about the Justifiable need, i just think we need more protection from the law for those who dont have a permit to carry, or where the permit may fall short like with long guns.

I dont know where you pulled all this from...I'm kinda at a lost for words where u ended up getting this statement.

people inherit guns all the time and legally bring them to a range with out ever obtaining a FID. Front of my card says "....is hereby granted permission to purchase rifles and shotguns pursuant to provisions....with amendments and supplements. I believe this is the up to date card too considering i just got it a couple months ago.

FID= Purchaser card... i dont know where people get the idea it gives you any right to carry a rifle. Through exemptions of the law your allowed to transport them accordingly Also you need to list the pistols on your CCW, which means if you buy after that, you need to reapply for the permit. Not to mention the fact there is still restrictions that can be put in place. -trust me, no ones holding there breath around here, i was asked what needs to be changed, and i gave my opinion.

Doesnt quite work like that. A CCW in NJ i believe is for pistols. We need an overhaul on all the laws, get rid of anything that makes guns owners criminals(exemptions don't count since you have to prove your exempt), and your inherently a criminal until you prove otherwise(not exactly innocent until proven guilty). Secondly, i don't see how NJ can deny people the right to carry, this is either a carry state or it isn't, i would rather no one carries a gun in this state, then have the crooked politicians be the only ones to protect themselves. In theory 'justifiable need" isnt that bad, but apparently the state doesn't view self defense as a justifiable need. Honestly, i dont have time right now, but i could just copy and paste florida laws, and 40 of the other ones, but i think most people get the point...why can't we find some middle ground with this state..

What are they trying to hide? I mean really... I was always under the mind set if your doing the right thing u have nothing to hide...i guess they feel different.

OMG...haaha!! i told my mom ammo makes a great stocking stuffer!

+1 this is a tricky question to answer, some towns may see the appeal and see it as a means to disregard your denial, some towns may deny you becuase u lied on it and they don't recognize the appeal. The question is did the appeal overthrow the original decision of denial.

I don't have direct link to the shirts with the lay off dates, but i defiantly herd it floating around a couple months ago.

Honestly, not a whole lot of them are/were over staffed. Maybe over staffed by a handful, but they've been cutting by the hundred. The problem is, these cities there cutting are already on the verge of well, collapsing. Newark just dumped a SH8t load of money into there downtown district, including the new devils stadium. I'd like to see how they plan on keeping that place safe and clean with less police street presence. You also have high ranking schools like NJIT and UMDNJ in the middle of newarks ghetto, which means there going to have to step up security...the campuses are not gated, and anyone can walk onto them. Newarks shooting/death rate is already on the rise this year.

Its a catch 22 really. FID's P2P's and COE's only give you the right to obtain a firearms. However, LE ask for them becuase it's one of the only way they can check if the firearm is legal(on the spot), what makes it legal is the way you obtain it, not the way you own. SO, a good way to show the firearm is legal, is to be able to provide the info in which it was purchased. SO while an FID doesnt mean diddly squat, an P2P or COE, can be used to show a gun is legal.

What about discharging a firearm in the event of protecting yourself during a break in? Would you face charges based on the fact you were defending your life?

+1 i would rather cover up the threads and pin that on then have them completely removed, one day we may be able to throw a flash hider on.

I believe he is considered a felon, no pardon, time served, he no longer has a right to own a firearm. I can only wonder if they based this action on the premise that they dis-involved the pro-gun lobbies. Either way it is in my opinion no one did this out of the goodness of there hearts.

like the title says, maybe maks is aware, just a heads up.

Depends what your comparing.. the M9A1 vs 92a1 sights are identical, but the 92A1 has removable front sight. The only advantage i see is if you were set on getting night sights. I would take a beveled mag well and standard trigger guard over the removable sight, but that because i have no intention of changing the sight to begin with.

DP.

I put my snows on last friday, i saw the forecast for monday and saw snow so i jumped on the opportunity since i had a lot going on this week. I can definitely say i make it around better in the snow with fwd + snowies, then most people do with all season 4x4. I have summer wheels so its a must they come off, they dont provide the better traction in the cold weather any way, and total death sled with any kind of snow covering. I go from 18" summer performance to 16" Dunlop M3 snows- i change all four, i had a rear end slide out a couple years ago which prompted me to get snows in the first place. It wasnt bad by anymeans but that was the issue, i took a slow turn and the rear kept going, Your actually supposed to change all 4, i mean your talking about insane traction on the front end and barely any at the rear. Me and a friend do ours at the same time every year, he has a nice garage that keeps us warm.

Maybe you should just go home and hang yourself with your game controller.... I can't it's wireless. Whahah!!