Jump to content
lunker

Accurate Bolt Action Rifles in 30 '06?

Recommended Posts

I have been looking around and it seems like neither Remington nor Savage makes a heavy barreled bolt action in 30 '06. I thought that someone would make the equivalent of a 700P or a 10FP in 30-06. Is there a reason why they don't in this caliber? Is it somehow less inherently accurate than 308? I know that the action is longer, but that doesn't seem like a good enough reason.

I was already planning on reloading in 30 '06 for my M1 Garand. Getting a rifle in 308 is not really a problem since 308 and 30 '06 take the same caliber bullets. I just wanted to satisfy my curiosity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pretty much.

 

I'm surprised. You use the same bullet as a 308 and could use the same barrel. Unless I am mistaken, the only thing that has to be different between a 30 '06 rifle and a 308 rifle is the chamber size (and of course bolt action pull length, bolt size, etc). I'm not a ballistician, but I don't get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pretty much.

 

I'm surprised. You use the same bullet as a 308 and could use the same barrel. Unless I am mistaken, the only thing that has to be different between a 30 '06 rifle and a 308 rifle is the chamber size (and of course bolt action pull length, bolt size, etc). I'm not a ballistician, but I don't get it.

Here Chris http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=165663802

 

Unless you are going to shoot over 800 yds, there is not really an advantage to a 30 06. For hunting you will have a different result depending on game and bullet weight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you are going to shoot over 800 yds, there is not really an advantage to a 30 06. For hunting you will have a different result depending on game and bullet weight.

 

Thanks Tim. I was thinking about all the brass I already have in 30 '06 and how it would make sense to use some of it in a bolt gun. The only issue is that I would reload them differently (i.e. neck sizing only for bolt gun brass).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pretty much.

 

I'm surprised. You use the same bullet as a 308 and could use the same barrel. Unless I am mistaken, the only thing that has to be different between a 30 '06 rifle and a 308 rifle is the chamber size (and of course bolt action pull length, bolt size, etc). I'm not a ballistician, but I don't get it.

 

Here ya go.

 

http://www.snipercountry.com/articles/accuracyfacts.asp

 

At 1000 yards, where both the .30-06 and .308 were allowed in Palma matches, the .308 was the clear-cut most accurate of the two. If top shooters felt the .30-06 was a more accurate round, they would have used it - they didn't. In fact by the early 1970s, the scoring ring dimensions on the 800 - 1000 yard target were also cut in about half due to the accuracy of both the .308 Win. over the .30-06 and the .30-.338 over the .300 H&H when used in long range matches.

 

Most top highpower shooters feel the main reason the .308 is much more accurate than the .30-06 is its shorter, fatter case promotes more uniform and gentle push on the bullet due to a higher loading density (less air space) and a more easily uniformly ignitable powder charge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Malsua. That explains a lot. By that logic, those Winchester Super Short Magnums should be tack drivers.

 

From the wiki page on WSSM

 

There are basic advantages inherent to the Short Magnum concept. The idea is that the short, fat powder column gives a more uniform load density and ignition rate and therefore a more consistent burn. This in turn should translate into improved accuracy and potentially moderate recoil due to more efficient use of propellants.

 

I can't vouch for that, it's just what is out there. Shrug. I always shot .308 better but I just figured it because the .308s seemed to be the better rifles that my dad and step dad and friends all had. The 30.06s all tended to be really old so I attributed it to the rifle, not the round but that's just what I was exposed to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • If you’re going to VA, buy 2 radios.  Program one for here and one for there.  If you guys are buying Baofeng radios do yourself a favor and get a tactical antenna for it,it’ll extend your reach.
    • Both our memories are a bit lacking. 3 bystanders were hit by NYPD bullets and 6 were hit by fragments at the Empire State Building shooting. The bullets later were determined to have passed through the bad guy as I said. He was not a big guy. The police fired 16 rds and 7 hit the bad guy.  Spray and pray?  I think not.  These officers fired until the threat was stopped and everyone is moving. Have you ever tried to hit a moving target whilst you're moving.  If you watch the video from where the police encounter him, the BG draws his gun from his bag, NYPD guys shoot, and the BG hit the ground is about 2 or 3 seconds.  The closest officer is maybe 12 feet or less.  The closest cover are those concrete flower pots.  If the officers chose to take cover before drawing the BG would have had a chance to shoot at least one officer. Know your target and beyond?  Agree 100%.  However, this by the Empire State Building at 9 am during the week.  There are bystanders and traffic in every direction.  The officers had a choice of doing what they did or letting the BG shoot them with his 1911 and shoot someone else. I think they made the right choice and the same one I would have made.  The officers exercised the best option in protecting themselves and the public. The first video is the police shooting.  The second is more detailed and gives you a lot of background information on the shooter. One thing this shows is if NYPD had to use fmj undoubtedly more bystanders would have been wounded perhaps killed.  NJ's hollowpoint law. only creates more danger to the public.    
    • Updated Price, Will ship with factory Sig Grip and factory sig Stock, 2 Lancer 10 Rounders (short) 1 Lander 10 Rounder (long Pinned) pictured
×
×
  • Create New...