Turbotezza 1 Posted April 30, 2011 Would it be illigal to have a forearm (say a carbon fiber tube on an AR) longer than barrel? From the side it would look like a internally supressed firearm. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vjf915 456 Posted April 30, 2011 It would essentially act as a handguard, one that is longer than normal. I don't see why there should be any problem with it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Turbotezza 1 Posted April 30, 2011 Knowing how anal some 'people' here are, I was thinking that with the muzzle recessed, the forearm could be seen to act like a flash suppressor/hider and perhaps even a 'silencer'. It would essentially act as a handguard, one that is longer than normal. I don't see why there should be any problem with it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vlad G 345 Posted April 30, 2011 Who the hell knows, but the better question is why the hell would you want such a thing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Turbotezza 1 Posted April 30, 2011 I like the SD look and besides I'm bored! Who the hell knows, but the better question is why the hell would you want such a thing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vlad G 345 Posted April 30, 2011 Fair enough. You will probably destroy the tube sooner or later, but its your money Actually, I'd be concerned about the pressure wave cracking a CF tube, I'm not sure they are built to take internal pressure and CF can be unpredictable when it lets go unless it was designed with that in mind. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Turbotezza 1 Posted April 30, 2011 Or I coule use alum tube. Certainly cheaper option. Fair enough. You will probably destroy the tube sooner or later, but its your money Actually, I'd be concerned about the pressure wave cracking a CF tube, I'm not sure they are built to take internal pressure and CF can be unpredictable when it lets go unless it was designed with that in mind. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,878 Posted April 30, 2011 Isn't there laws about barrel shrouds? That might constitute one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vlad G 345 Posted April 30, 2011 Isn't there laws about barrel shrouds? That might constitute one. I believe that is about pistols not rifles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,878 Posted April 30, 2011 Ahh ok. Wasn't sure. I've seen "shrouds" on GSG-5's which made them look like MP5-SD's. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Turbotezza 1 Posted April 30, 2011 Thats only for pistols with mags that attach outside the grip. Isn't there laws about barrel shrouds? That might constitute one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vjf915 456 Posted April 30, 2011 Thats only for pistols with mags that attach outside the grip. Well....to be more specific...... ii. A semi-automatic pistol that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has atleast two of the following: (1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip; (2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer; (3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned; (4) Manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded; and/or (5) A semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm So it's not JUST semi-automatic pistols with mags that attach outside of the pistol grip. It's also if the pistol has a threaded barrel, weighs 50 ounces or more unloaded, or is a semi-automatic version of an automatic pistol. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites