Jump to content
hd2000fxdl

Occupy Atlanta

Recommended Posts

they do not KNOW you can or can not afford it.. they do not KNOW what you may or may not have in the works.. they do not KNOW that you are not about to start a very profitable business..

 

the point is if the deceive you and tell you the terms are NOT what they are.. then sure.. they sure liable.. but if they TELL YOU exactly what the terms are.. and you buy it anyway.. how the hell is it the banks fault? they said.. it will cost x y and z.. and you say OK sign me up..

 

and if you READ what I right.. you would understand that I think NO ONE deserves a bail out..

 

The bank doesn't know if someone can afford the loan? You sure about that? I had TWO mortgage lenders tell me flat-out to rewrite my application and increase my monthly income so I could qualify for a larger loan. Was I the only one this happened to? I walked out on both. Oddly enough, I had already qualified for more than I wanted to spend on a house at other banks with my legitimate income. That is how desperate some bankers/banks were to get people to spend more. A home buyer who followed this suggestion and lied about their income is an irresponsible idiot who deserves his/her consequence. What about the banker?

 

Banks used to verify income and assets. You had to furnish pay stubs or tax returns and your assets were subject to verification. Then many in the industry switched over to "stated-income" loans often called liars loans by the very banks who offered them.

 

The part in bold in particular is what confuses me about your position. The bank doesn't know you're not about to start a very profitable business? Perhaps, but maybe the home buyer didn't know he was about to lose his high-paying job or suffer a catastrophic illness and end up in default on his mortgage.

 

Banks knew exactly what they were doing here. They sold people mortgages that they knew they couldn't afford and then bundled them up and sold them off. The dirty not-so-secret in the industry was that sub-prime loans could be tolerated because they were a) profitable since sub-prime borrowers could be charged higher interest and b) low risk for the bank of origin since these loans could be sold off to Fannie Mae once the fees were collected

 

I'm really not trying to tick you off here so I apologize if it has that effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank doesn't know if someone can afford the loan? You sure about that? I had TWO mortgage lenders tell me flat-out to rewrite my application and increase my monthly income so I could qualify for a larger loan. Was I the only one this happened to? I walked out on both. Oddly enough, I had already qualified for more than I wanted to spend on a house at other banks with my legitimate income. That is how desperate some bankers/banks were to get people to spend more. A home buyer who followed this suggestion and lied about their income is an irresponsible idiot who deserves his/her consequence. What about the banker?

 

Banks used to verify income and assets. You had to furnish pay stubs or tax returns and your assets were subject to verification. Then many in the industry switched over to "stated-income" loans often called liars loans by the very banks who offered them.

 

The part in bold in particular is what confuses me about your position. The bank doesn't know you're not about to start a very profitable business? Perhaps, but maybe the home buyer didn't know he was about to lose his high-paying job or suffer a catastrophic illness and end up in default on his mortgage.

 

Banks knew exactly what they were doing here. They sold people mortgages that they knew they couldn't afford and then bundled them up and sold them off. The dirty not-so-secret in the industry was that sub-prime loans could be tolerated because they were a) profitable since sub-prime borrowers could be charged higher interest and b) low risk for the bank of origin since these loans could be sold off to Fannie Mae once the fees were collected

 

I'm really not trying to tick you off here so I apologize if it has that effect.

I had a no doc loan so I know all about it.. it someone encourages you to cheat on your taxes.. and you do.. it is their fault.. or yours.. if a coworker encourages you to take a 20 from the drawer.. whos fault is it... if there is someone in school who tells you to cheat on the exam.. and you do.. who is ultimately at fault..

 

you control your own destiny.. you are not a puppet.. you made the right choices.. others did not.. it is not the entire banking industries fault that there are a bunch of D bag mortgage lenders.. just like not all cops are bad.. just like not all used car salesman are snakes.. again.. one last time.. at the end of the day.. it is YOUR call..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had TWO mortgage lenders tell me flat-out to rewrite my application and increase my monthly income so I could qualify for a larger loan.

 

If they did that, how would the person who did that think they could pay that off????

 

I hope non of these bankers asked anyone to jump off a bridge..:facepalm:

 

Harry

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking to pick up a Kriss vector  in 9mm.  Let me know what you got.   Thanks Chris  
    • If you’re going to VA, buy 2 radios.  Program one for here and one for there.  If you guys are buying Baofeng radios do yourself a favor and get a tactical antenna for it,it’ll extend your reach.
    • Both our memories are a bit lacking. 3 bystanders were hit by NYPD bullets and 6 were hit by fragments at the Empire State Building shooting. The bullets later were determined to have passed through the bad guy as I said. He was not a big guy. The police fired 16 rds and 7 hit the bad guy.  Spray and pray?  I think not.  These officers fired until the threat was stopped and everyone is moving. Have you ever tried to hit a moving target whilst you're moving.  If you watch the video from where the police encounter him, the BG draws his gun from his bag, NYPD guys shoot, and the BG hit the ground is about 2 or 3 seconds.  The closest officer is maybe 12 feet or less.  The closest cover are those concrete flower pots.  If the officers chose to take cover before drawing the BG would have had a chance to shoot at least one officer. Know your target and beyond?  Agree 100%.  However, this by the Empire State Building at 9 am during the week.  There are bystanders and traffic in every direction.  The officers had a choice of doing what they did or letting the BG shoot them with his 1911 and shoot someone else. I think they made the right choice and the same one I would have made.  The officers exercised the best option in protecting themselves and the public. The first video is the police shooting.  The second is more detailed and gives you a lot of background information on the shooter. One thing this shows is if NYPD had to use fmj undoubtedly more bystanders would have been wounded perhaps killed.  NJ's hollowpoint law. only creates more danger to the public.    
×
×
  • Create New...