Lautenburg: We must restrict ammo

[Shawnmoore81 623]

Come on November

[NJScott 15]

Come on November

 

And we will have the status quo re: our U.S. Senate tandem.

 

 

[Rifleman1 32]

2000 rounds isn't even close to a trunk full

 

Ahhh, 55 gr FMJ X-TAC. 3,270 fps, 1,306 ft lbs and TKOF of 5.76 Nice!

[Cemeterys Gun Blob 165]

Come on November

 

Everybody will be voted back in. Nobody will be voted. New critters on the scene will be due to retirement.

[Spartiati 63]

Remarkable.

 

So we start with the idea that we want to prevent what happened in CO from happening again. Tell me how what these two retards have proposed will prevent it from happening again? A person could still go to a local store and buy 300 rounds of ammo unfettered and do exactly what this guy did in CO. It is irrelevant that this guy bought 6000 rounds. He didn't and couldn't carry all that ammo anyway.

 

I propose a new bill, how about the "Must have atleast average intelligence in order to run for public office bill.". It would require anyone who runs for office to have an IQ of atleast 110. There is no way these people have an IQ greater than 100.

[Shawnmoore81 623]

All the gun grabbers care about is tightening the grip on guns. It doesn't have to make sense, it just has to make one more restriction. It's just one less hurdle to jump later.

[vladtepes 1,060]

The irony being he fired nowhere near one thousand rounds.... If he only had 500 there would be just as many dead people... Unfortunately logic is in short supply...

[Old Glock guy 1,127]

The irony being he fired nowhere near one thousand rounds.... If he only had 500 there would be just as many dead people... Unfortunately logic is in short supply...

 

I couldn't agree more. I said the same thing on another thread. A few hundred rounds are plenty for someone bent on mayhem and destruction. Banning larger quantities is a needless restriction on law-abiding enthisiasts like us.

[silverado427 10,730]

Its time for TERM LIMITS. TWO AND YOUR DONE.

[vladtepes 1,060]

I couldn't agree more. I said the same thing on another thread. A few hundred rounds are plenty for someone bent on mayhem and destruction. Banning larger quantities is a needless restriction on law-abiding enthisiasts like us.

 

maybe we should just make murder illegal.... oh wait..

[Anselmo 87]

Its time for TERM LIMITS. TWO AND YOUR DONE.

 

How is that democracy?

[woodentoe 14]

How is that democracy?

 

Democracy in the manner with which representatives are chosen. However, we do not live in a democracy. We live in a Constitutional Republic. Let's not pretend that Term Limits are tyranny. Majority simply doesn't RULE.

 

I'm sure it is quite unpopular here, but I would favor term limits and limits on the affect that private capital has on elections. As stands now, each candidate is bought and paid for before they are sworn in, and the longer they "serve" the more cemented their loyalty to the moneyed interests that keep them fat and in office.

[Kaiser7 33]

Democracy in the manner with which representatives are chosen. However, we do not live in a democracy. We live in a Constitutional Republic. Let's not pretend that Term Limits are tyranny. Majority simply doesn't RULE.

 

I'm sure it is quite unpopular here, but I would favor term limits and limits on the affect that private capital has on elections. As stands now, each candidate is bought and paid for before they are sworn in, and the longer they "serve" the more cemented their loyalty to the moneyed interests that keep them fat and in office.

 

+1

 

I'm pretty sure that our founding fathers had strong opinions against career politicians. I would support the contribution limits too.

 

Too bad there's a 0% chance of any of this ever getting passed.