Mr.Stu

If this process was in place, Hillary would be nowhere near the presidency.

You seem to think chilling the dumbass legislators desire to pass more and more dumb laws is a bad thing. I'd say it would be a great thing. Testimony during the hearings prior to passing new bills that tell them that they are going against the constitution should be plenty of proof that they knew before they passed the law. When SCOTUS says it is unconstitutional, that is the proof that they ignored the facts and indeed did act against their oath. If they want to point to other legislators that voted the same way, that makes it a conspiracy charge as well as treason.

I'm sure you're absolutely right. Thanks for setting me straight.

Also, a semi-auto will chop the felt recoil down significantly, especially if it is gas operated.

His permit will only become invalid on Jan 1, 2024 if he has not completed the updated training and qualification. The permit expiration date remains what is printed on it. There are places to get the training done cheaper than $275. If Phillipsburg is a reasonable distance for him to travel, have him contact me. I will get him up to speed for $150.

If you got one of the special order ones without a threaded barrel, I think it would be legal with a pinned magazine. I've shot both a MAC10 and an UZI and they really are not worth the hype. I can't imagine this being any better.

The short version is Angela Cai wants the 3rd Circuit to follow the 2nd Circuit on all the bits she likes because if they didn't it would cause a split, but for the parts she doesn't like she's happy for there to be a Circuit split. She wants her cake and to eat it too.

Since the 2nd Circuit upheld the sensitive places parts of the NY law, the NJ AG's office wrote a letter to the 3rd Circuit Judges saying they should copy NY. The exception is that the 2nd Circuit supported the District Court decision that the default rule for private property that is open to the public does not require express consent from the property owner before a person can carry there. In the letter to the 3rd Circuit they basically said that the 3rd Circuit should follow the 2nd Circuit's decision, except where they got the default rule part wrong.

But he is nearly dead if you believe his constant whining about getting his neck burned by a bit of brass. He'll tell you I did it to him too.

It has a 24" barrel and is currently sporting an extended magazine tube - makes it 9+1 IIRC.

I don't know how old or big your kid is, but I have a Benelli Nova 20g youth model sitting in the back of the safe doing not very much.

No background check is needed for an 80% kit. They are perfectly legal to buy and complete in PA. The only offense is an NJ law which is possession of a "ghost gun". Nobody in PA is beholden to an NJ law. The vendor in PA is not responsible for any individual who chose to break NJ law by transporting the 80% kit into NJ. This overreach by Platkin needs to be stopped.

I suspect the OP is no longer looking for a safe, unless he's now looking to upgrade to a larger model. This topic is 11 years old!

Hanlon’s razor is the adage that you should “never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”. Applied broadly, this principle suggests that when assessing people’s actions, you should not assume that they acted out of a desire to cause harm, as long as there is a reasonable alternative explanation. https://effectiviology.com/hanlons-razor/

Where did I highlight the encourage part? The underlined text defines the AG as the chief law enforcement officer of the State. What he does or does not encourage in that role is irrelevant to his position as head cop.

It probably has more to do with the new CCARE protocol being issued 2.5 months after the deadline in the statute (July 1) so they extended the deadline to comply by 2 months. It is more likely they didn't even consider the holiday season, than do it maliciously. See Hanlon's Razor - "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

Stupid != Ignorant

It has only been the law since May 21, 1970. How much time do you think is needed? https://www.njoag.gov/about/ 52:17B-98. Declarations of policy The Legislature recognizes that the existence of organized crime presents a serious threat to our political, social and economic institutions and helps bring about a loss of popular confidence in the agencies of government. Accordingly, it is hereby declared to be the public policy of this State to encourage cooperation among law enforcement officers and to provide for the general supervision of criminal justice by the Attorney General as chief law enforcement officer of the State, in order to secure the benefits of a uniform and efficient enforcement of the criminal law and the administration of criminal justice throughout the State. All the provisions of this act shall be liberally construed to achieve these ends and administered and enforced with a view to carrying out the above declaration of policy. L.1970, c. 74, s. 2, eff. May 21, 1970.

When you're getting rained or snowed on tomorrow, we'll be thinking of you.

I'm wearing a blue CNJFO t-shirt

I'm thinking I'm going to go today regardless. I'll aim for about 11:30. If anyone wants to join me I'd be happy to see you. I'll have guns that anyone is welcome to use, a thrower, clays, ammo and a hunting license.

I'm available

The AG is the Chief law enforcement officer for the entire state. You won't find him in the organization chart for a PD, but he is the last word in the executive branch when it comes to law enforcement. This is the reason police chiefs are repeatedly dropped from the law suits. The AG being enjoined covers every cop in the state.

They are about the same as the Glock MOS plates. I got the DPP one because Glock didn't supply one for the K footprint.

Are you guys crazy? No wonder ammo is at a premium with you hoarders gobbling it all up!